Indianapolis Tennis Center future in limbo

November 19, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Tennis Center will not be demolished next spring. I repeat, the Indianapolis Tennis Center will not be demolished next spring. According to Roger Schmenner, chief of staff to IUPUI’s chancellor, the tennis facility will not be touched “for the next few years.”

So, if the ATP Tour stop there can continue to maintain itself financially, the event appears to have a home through 2012. Local tennis sources still remained skeptical about the tennis center’s near-term future despite Schmenner’s claims.

A furor erupted earlier this week when higher-ups inside the local tennis community began contacting media members and tennis followers far and wide asking them to petition IUPUI Chancellor Charles Bantz to stop the demolition.

One well-placed source inside the tennis community said the NCAA is planning to expand its headquarters on the site where the tennis center—including the 10,000-seat stadium court—now stands.

“That is absolutely untrue,” Schmenner said.
 
One thing is certain. The NCAA is planning a ground breaking next spring for a $35 million, 130,000-square-foot expansion. NCAA officials and Schmenner said it would be on White River State Park land directly west of the current NCAA headquarters, not on the tennis center site, which is about a half-mile to the northwest.

“The Indianapolis Tennis Center is not a part of what the NCAA is doing,” Schmenner said. “The future use of that site is still undetermined.”

IUPUI has determined that by 2028, the tennis center will come down, but Schmenner said IUPUI will likely find a better use for the valuable land and not farm it out or sell it off.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT