Danica Patrick grabs steering wheel of her own career

December 1, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Danica Patrick, who joined the Indy Racing League five years ago as a 22-year-old racing prodigy, is growing up and gripping tightly the steering wheel of her own career.
 
Sources close to the race car driver told IBJ that Patrick is taking command over her burgeoning business enterprises, leaving her dad, T.J., as more of a fan than a business manager.

So we can assume it was Danica’s decision to stay with Andretti Autosport, and if she joins a NASCAR endeavor, that will be her call as well.
 
But that’s not all. Danica too has become much more involved in commercial deals, decisions over licensing agreements and distribution of Danica products, speaking engagements and other off-track matters.

Companies used to hearing from T.J. and other intermediaries are now dealing more directly with Danica, racing business sources said.

Danica, 27, is making clear her goals, and they extend far beyond being a Go Daddy Girl or even winning the Indianapolis 500. She seeks a celebrity status as big as all outdoors, and she’s smart enough to know she’ll need the right corporate partners to take her where no race car driver has gone before.

This week, Patrick told AdWeek that she’d like to be a spokeswoman for Pepsi, which is pretty telling about her commercial aspirations. Look what Pepsi did for Britney Spears. No, I’m not saying Patrick wants to become the queen of pop.

“You look at the famous ads in the past, like being a Pepsi girl or something, being in those advertisements,” Patrick told AdWeek. “There are some very, very well-known brands, so many. But I think Pepsi would be cool.”

Someone might want to tell Danica that Coke is the official soft drink of the Izod IndyCar Series and Dr. Pepper (owned by Dr. Pepper Snapple Group Inc.) is a sponsor of Andretti Autosport.
 
But then again, I’m sure she knows that. She’s just blazing her own trail.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Ooops
    Someone who wants to take control of their own business relationships should be a little more careful with casual references to sponsors and potential sponsors. PR 101.
  • on the fence
    She obviously wasn't going to say "Coke" as they dropped her after the 2007 IndyCar Series season. As a PR professional, I'm hard pressed to decide if it's all that negative for her to mention Pepsi. After all, Alex of Alex's Lemonade Stand mentioned Country Time on Oprah in 2004 and it landed her an endorsement contract with them that still finds her picture and story on their packaging across the country today.
  • The Usual
    I don't see how 12 more customers is worth PepsiCo's time or money
  • A win on occasion
    A win would help.
  • skeptic, but still
    I'm an IRL skeptic, but even I have to say that Danica has more than 12 fans. She has at least 20. Seriously, any marketing expert would tell you that Danica draws attention wherever she goes. Her merchandise sales numbers back that up. And sadly, in some ways, it has little to do with her ability to drive. Though, Paul, you are right, a few more wins would send her into another stratosphere.
  • Who?
    I still think she belongs in the kitchen with the rest of the appliances!
  • Trouble is...
    Her racing skills are modest. Her "it" quotient is modest. She has curiosity wave to ride yet, but the truth is, she is an average looking, average race car driver, with modest personality abilities. Nah. Not gonna happen. Danica will make good pop trivia in five years, however. Nope. Not the pop superstar she aspires to. Not by a long shot-ee.
  • The Usual
    How many people around here ever bought an RCA product because they were on the Hoosier Dome? I think most sponsorships are specious at best. Especially with average talented spokespeople. Can anyone remember any product Anna Kournikova ever promoted?
  • sold on sponsorships
    I did. I drove past the RCA Dome, the light bulb went on in my head, and I drove right down to hh gregg and bought the biggest wide-screen RCA TV I could find. Then my 13-year-old son accidently flung a broom stick through the darn thing. But most times, those sponsorships work subconsciously on roobs like you who don't think they work at all.
  • The Usual
    Only you weak people allow advertising to take control of what's left of your mind.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT