I guess some transgressions are forgivable and others are not. At least when it comes to the world of big-time athletes
and endorsement deals.
Tiger Woods’ biggest endorsers—including Gatorade, Nike, Gillette and
Chevron—are sticking with him. We all know what Woods did and is accused of doing, so I won’t go into all that
here.
But I hearken back to 1997, when Indiana native Fuzzy Zoeller had an indiscretion at The Master’s.
He uttered some very unfortunate racial jokes about Woods to other golfers. Those words were caught on tape and for a while
made headlines.
I think most of us can agree, there’s no place for racial jokes in sports or anywhere.
Kmart and the rest of Zoeller’s sponsors dropped him like a hot potato.
But I can’t help wonder if
the 180-degree different treatment each man received following their faux pas is more about the type of indiscretion or the
relative return on investment each man promised his corporate partners.
In any event, Woods, so far, has
come out unscathed in the commercial sense. His corporate partners don’t appear to have any more discretion than he
does.
Swiss watch company Tag Heuer has run ads—including a big cover ad in USA Today—this week,
featuring Tiger Woods that read “What are you made of?”
Accenture, a global management consulting,
technology services and outsourcing company, ran an ad in the Wall Street Journal featuring Woods walking through the tall
fescue of a golf course with the line “The road to high performance isn’t always paved.”
I think
I speak for crisis communication experts everywhere when I say to that ad, “Yikes!”
On the cover of
Accenture’s Web site today, the company has a picture of Woods in the rough with the line, “Opportunity isn’t
always obvious.”
To quote ESPN’s Tom Jackson, “C’mon, man!”
Maybe
Woods’ won’t lose a penny in sponsorships. Maybe, as local sports marketing guru Larry DeGaris suggested on WIBC
earlier this week, some men may actually find Woods’ more admirable after recent revelations about his personal life.
But then there’s this. Jesper Parnevik’s public apology to Woods’ wife, Elin Nordegren. Parnevik
introduced Woods and Nordegren, who worked for Parnevik and his wife as a nanny.
Parnevik had some sharp
words and advice for Woods yesterday after finishing first-round play at the PGA Tour's final-stage of qualifying being held
at Bear Lakes Country Club in Florida.
“It’s a private thing, of course, but when you are the guy he
is, the world’s best athlete, you should think more before you do stuff,” Parnevik said.
Then he unleashed
the line that had to make every Nike executive from Oregon to New York cringe.
“Maybe not just do it, like
Nike says,” Parnevik said.
Unscathed? Time will tell. And that’s not a line from a Tag Heuer ad.








IBJ Conversations
39 Comments
Add Comment
Parnevik needs to keep his mouth shut and let Tiger and Elin work out their differences.
Everyone forgets the Tiger/Nike commercial in which he states "There are still golf courses I can't play today because of my color" What was THAT?? Today, this has all changed with my friends agreeing with me at last. Fuzzy's remarks WERE wrong, but he was and still is regarded as a jokester and plays to the people both verbally and physically.
The first sad truth is that we have lost the ability to laugh at ourselves. Not every joke told about African Americans is racist. The same goes for any minority. One must look at the big picture because once someone is branded as a "Racist", they have no defense. Lest we forget the more recent Don Imus situation. No one took the time to consider his past joking and ALL of the charital work he and his family does. The Imus ranch for kids with cancer, the Fallen Heroes Fund for returning vets with war wounds. Their work combatting against Autism. If a person is a jokester, take that into consideration before you smash his very livelihood.
Well Fuzzy, out of respect for you, I won't shop at K-Mart, have yet to buy anything with a Dunlop logo on it and have a Fuzzy Duck headcover for my driver. Out of sheer disgust for the horribly racist commercial by Tiger and Nike, I won't buy Nike products.
Maybe Fuzzy should wait until the fourth day to step forward and tell Tiger "What Goes Around, Comes Around".
Our country has demonstrated that it is willing to forgive transgressions of a sexual nature. Remember President Bill Clinton and a young intern named Monica? As a society, we forgave him. However, our society is not so quick to forgive transgressions which insult people based on race. Nor should we. Zoeller's racial jokes are unforgivable.
Tiger's sponsors have aligned with our society as a whole. We are ready to forgive a wandering eye and a breach of marriage vows, so long as the transgressor is genuinely sorry. We should not forgive the ugliness of racism. Zoeller's and Tiger's transgressions are not the same and they should not be treated as if they are the same.
Perhaps you should look up the word racist. Making a joke does not necessarily qualify one as being racist, since he or she may have directed that to an indivdual and was not dismissing an entire group of people. And to say that making a racial joke is unforgiveable? Huh?
In case you haven't noticed, people make bad decisions on the spur of the moment. Most people at one point or another have told jokes that were inappropriate. Does that imply that they are not to be forgiven? Perhaps you have said one of some type of joke you are or were sorry for. Are you not to be forgiven?
But for an individual to carry on multiple affairs over a period of time and tell continuous lies to cover it up? That's not a mistake, that is planned and is an indication of poor character and is not deserving of the plaudits, excuses, and dismissal that Woods will continue to get.
As for me, I'm sticking with Fuzzy. If he were a comedian, nothing would have been said; does that make it right? No, just a double standard practiced by minorities all of the time.
Tiger - me eye, I'm no fan!
Perhaps you should simply learn how to read. You completely missed the point. The two acts are different and, thus, should be treated differently. You seem to be very quick to defend the telling of inappropriate jokes. Apparently you condone such conduct, and based on your comments engage in the same.
Is your moral outrage about Tiger equally applied to Elliot Spitzer or Mark Sanford? How about Bill Clinton?
Your blanket condemnation of minorities speaks volumes about your mindset. For you, intolerance is perfectly acceptable, but cheating on your spouse shows a lack of character. According to your bizarre logic, sponsors should drop Tiger but by contrast they should say "Aw shucks, Zoeller is just being one of the guys." Neither of these men showed good judgment. But the impact of their conduct is not the same.
I look forward to Tiger's eventual return to the golf course.
The impact of their conduct (zoeller and woods) certainly is not the same. One made stupid comments off the cuff in a locker room. The other has purposefully maintained an illicit relationship for 31 months and even in the throes of capture, sought to manipulate his lover to cover his deceit. Look forward to Tiger playing golf? I'd rather buy tickets to a Fuzzy Zoeller comedy night.
cintzo - out
And I am rather certain that a worldly and privileged 21 year-old, at this particular point-in-time, COULD with relative ease, have "survived" a few bigoted and off-color (no pun intended) references, even to the "tenderest" and most unfavorably put-upon fraction of his complex genealogy.
But there was a failure to consider that this fraction within Tiger...was of the CONSUMMATE...of EARL! Earl didn't grow up thinking the world was his oyster. Earl shucked oysters. Earl didn't create applause, fanfare, or fluttering hearts just by flashing a perfect smile or sinking a 30-foot eagle. Earl was a dedicated husband, father, and patriot, heroically serving his country...silently in the Armed Forces. Earl heard "Fuzzy's joke" before Fuzzy was telling them. Earl learned to "smile"...in order to offset the internal pain. Earl could travel the world as an American hero, protecting her international interests...and Earl...could STILL...somehow come "home" and be a stranger in his own land, a "boy"...in the body of A Man!
The first Master's trophy was Tigers' reward for everything...and he gave it to Earl.
This was truly EARL's gift to Tiger from...on high! and through the Ages...Tiger is A MAN!!!!
And NOW, that which was "of Earl"...was being humiliated just LIKE Earl...even as Tiger was proving his fitness of fatherhood to HIS son, his detractors kept at it saying in essence, "choke, Tiger..before you win The Masters"...And Earl said...OH..HELL...NO! Not while I still have a breath.
'At this particular point in time' = now
As for the rest of that drivel, there is no help available. Just let us know which one is God. is it EARL? Or is it HIS son TIGER?
You point out my supposed failure to read and take your high road of your so-called point that I missed. You talk about the hurt people feel and then you call me a name? Some consistency! Typical for a liberal. Nice......
The fact Fuzzy felt comfortable enough to make such a statement in a very public way shows a very cavalier attitude on racism. Friend or not, as a black man, I was insult by the comments (as were millions like me), including Tiger. I am aware of Fuzzyâ??s reputation as a jokester. Well, a joke is only a joke if people laugh. No one (of consequence) was laughing.
Now, that being said, I don't condone what Tiger did. As a husband, and the father of two girls myself, I would never do anything to jeopardize their opinion on me in such a way. He made an error in judgment that like all domestic matters should be handled by the family in a private way. The fact that it came out in such a way is the only reason we are talking about this.
So, in short both men made mistakes in judgment. Both men paid a price for their mistake. Fuzzy had his money impacted, because he took his jokes a bit too far in a very public way. The endorsements left because they realized that a statement like that at that time would negatively impact their bottom-line. Tiger was effectively opening up a fresh market of consumers (minorities) to the game and they did not want to be left stating on the sideline. Tiger is having his money impacted via payouts to the wife. The difference is that Tiger will win again, so some endorsements may leave, but I am not worried about Tiger's ability to put food on the table or his place in golf history. If Fuzzy was a better golfer....
Truly sad, with no thanks to the Progressives.
Both men screwed up royally. Fuzzy Zoeller flapped his jaw for 10 seconds. It killed his career and made him an embarrassment to Hoosierhood.
Woods, a far better player, is a letch comparable to Bill Clinton, and if this explodes to show he was a habitual adulterer, may very well bite him where it hurts. And he'd deserve it.
The fact remains that Zoeller's stupid comments alienated at least 13% of the American population without question. His sponsors were jumping off a ship the man himself torpedoed. Woods' transgressions have devastated his family but only questionably offended others; the results are not as immediate as a racist remark. We haven't heard the last of the Woods debacle, and I'm confident there will be significant fallout.
But for anyone to defend Zoeller and Imus under internet anonymity smacks of both cowardice and a complete lack of empathy of what it has taken for blacks to be taken seriously in ANY white-dominated institution. Mere jokesters? Hardly. Would you be willing to defend Imus and Zoeller in front of your African American friends? What, you meant you don't have any? Imagine that...
Racism defined:
1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
I don't believe Fuzzy's joke fits any of those descriptions. Granted it was inappropriate, but it just shows that there are a lot of people looking for reasons to be offended and perhaps they need to develop some thicker skin and just move on.
While fried chicken and collard greens may imply a stereotype, it doesn't even come close to being racist.
Oh, and by the way, Tiger seems to be quite white when it comes to women. So I guess the offense only applies when he decides he wants to be black.
Sigh.........
You are correct. I only meant to imply that Fuzzy's joke was inappropriate because of the timing.
And by the way, the stereotype of fried chicken and collard greens would be more aptly directed toward southerners than any other group.
Heaven forbid had Fuzzy said anything about watermelon!
Look past your anger, see the big picture and understand that some jokes are cruel, some are stupid, and some are funny. If a person who is generally a good and decent man, a man who gives to people and charities and works to make the world better, a man who takes things in stride and tells jokes to make people laugh, but on occasion, makes a gaff (God forbid) why is he branded evil and trashed? Fuzzy and Imus are these guys and you know what? They aren't the Anti Christ.
Since this article was written, a whole lot more popped up about Tiger-who knows how many affairs, steroids, human growth hormones and only Tiger and God know what else. Does anyone still think these are a few isolated events?
My AA friends let it go years ago, maybe because they understand that not all jokes with racial tendency are cruel and intended to harm, just ask Tiger about the White Castle jokes he used on Fuzzy beforehand. You can't have both. Hope your assumptions have been answered.