CBS, Super Bowl advertisers may be rooting against Colts

January 22, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

There’s a lot of uncertainty heading into Sunday’s NFC and AFC championship games.

But one thing is certain. Officials for CBS and TV advertisers during this year’s Super Bowl will be rooting heartily for the Minnesota Vikings. Or at least they should be.

Whether those same TV executives and advertisers are rooting for the Indianapolis Colts is less clear.
 
There’s a strong contingent of TV experts who think the best Super Bowl match-up—purely from a ratings standpoint—this year would be Minnesota vs. New York Jets.

“With the Jets, you’d have the entire New York market, the largest media market in the world, covered, and no one draws national attention like Brett Favre,” a CBS official told me this morning.

Well, you can’t argue the Favre factor. In a season where the NFL has earned its highest season-long TV ratings since 1990, the purple-clad man from Mississippi has led the way.

The average NFL regular season game, according to New York-based Nielsen Media Research, was watched by 16.6 million people, 2 million more than last year. Favre played in two of the top four most watched games this year. Yes, both were against his old team, Green Bay, but still, you can’t deny his allure.

The Vikings-Packers game Nov. 1 drew 29.8 million viewers, tops this year. That game drew more viewers than any other fall broadcast. The Vikes-Pack game Nov. 30 on ESPN, drew 21.8 million viewers, the most watched cable broadcast ever.

The Favre factor is nothing new. The 1997 and 1998 Super Bowls—the two Favre played in—had TV ratings of 43.3 and 44.5 respectively. Each rating point equals 1.1 million TV households.

For comparison’s sake, last year’s Super Bowl earned a 42.0 rating, and the year before, featuring two huge media markets in New York and New England, notched a 43.1 rating.

So you can see, Favre rocks ratings. And given his many retirements and team changes, he probably would draw even more this year than in previous years.

But what about Peyton Manning? After all, the 2007 Super Bowl featuring the Colts and Bears earned a 42.6 TV rating.
 
“You can’t discount his star power,” my source at CBS said. He added that the game was bolstered by the size of the Chicago market and the Bears' following nationwide.

“Indianapolis is the 30th largest media market. And for sheer numbers, it just doesn’t hold a candle to New York,” my network source said. "I’m just saying it’s difficult to beat, from a ratings perspective, the drawing power of Favre, and the sheer size of New York.”

Of course, not everyone agrees.

“A match between Peyton Manning and Favre would feature two of the highest-profile quarterbacks ever,” Neal Pilson, former CBS Sports president told the Chicago Sun-Times. “So, if I were rooting for the highest-rated game, my vote goes to Indianapolis-Minnesota.”

With the average price of a 30-second spot this year sitting at $3 million, there’s plenty at stake for CBS and its advertisers. High ratings sometimes trigger escalator clauses in ad deals. It’s hard to believe that in 1990, a 30-second Super Bowl spot cost $700,000.

Those high ratings certainly help the NFL when negotiating its next TV deal. And high historical ratings also helps the network pushing those pricey ad spots.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Two scenarios to consider
    There are two dramas that could be written on Sunday. Peyton Manning playing in the Super Bowl against his dad's former team; and Brett Favre playing against his own former team. A Jets-Saints matchup just isn't that sexy, is it? Colts by 13; Vikings by 9.
  • SB ratings
    Since 70% of the population wacthes the Superbowl, I do not think a bias would exist based on ratings. Now if this were the NBA, you might have a valid point. If a bias is against the Colts it is because the media is based on the east coast and they hate fly over country.
  • Manning VS Favre
    Hard to believe a Manning VS Favre Super Bowl would not be a ratings bonanza. Most non-football fans are familiar with the two and you know the game would be exciting.
  • What about Brees?
    What about Peyton Manning against his dad's old team, the Saints, led by Drew Brees and their high-powered offense. I really don't think CBS can go wrong.
  • re:SB ratings
    The super bowl attracts about 70% of the sets-in-use at the time, which usually comes out to be about 30% of the total population.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT