It's time for Colts' Chris Polian to step forward

February 15, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For all the credit Indianapolis Colts President Bill Polian gets for putting together a mean NFL roster and an unparallel on-field record over the last decade, that may be the easiest part of his job.

Polian over the last 12 years has largely been the face of the Colts franchise, answering difficult—and sometimes dumb—questions from the media and dealing with a fan base that vacillates between content and less than thrilled.

Through his weekly radio show, TV appearances and regular press conferences, Polian has developed a skill for knowing which questions to answer, which to end-run and which to just plain take a pass on.

Polian is often put in a position of having to defend Colts’ coaches and owner Jim Irsay on everything from game-time calls to draft decisions, player salaries and the team’s stance on not joining the Capital Improvement Board bailout.

No one would argue that Polian has the best bed-side manner. That’s not part of his brand. But as long as he’s fielding Super Bowl contenders, the Horseshoe Kingdom is willing to weather whatever he’s shoveling.

Whether you think he’s right or wrong, you have to credit Polian—not Irsay—as the one who most often faces the firing squad when times are toughest. That’s the exception rather than the rule in the NFL, where owners like Jerry Jones and Daniel Snyder often can’t get out of their own way.
Part of Polian’s legacy will center on his willingness and ability to keep Irsay’s image relatively clean, while having no compunction about sullying his own when necessary.

It takes a unique person and personality to be able to serve as that kind of president.

So that leads to my next question. If Chris Polian is going to be the Colts’ next great leader, when is he going to be trotted out as the face of the franchise? And does he have the skill set needed for that end of the job?

The answer is, no one knows. But it’s probably time for the Colts to usher Chris out from behind the blue curtain to find out.

Chris Polian, the son of Bill Polian, is by all accounts his dad’s equal when it comes to eyeing talent and putting together a roster. But we have no idea what kind of leader he will be. I can tell you from my sit down interview with Chris in 2008, he has a very, very different personality than his dad’s.

Chris has been with the Colts since 1998, serving in just about every role in the team’s scouting department. Now, along with his dad and the team’s coach, he is one of three guys whose opinion matters on draft day.
Certainly, Irsay has designs on replacing Bill Polian with Chris Polian at some point. Several teams have come calling in the past two years—interested in hiring Chris Polian, 38, as their president. Irsay has chased them all away, giving Chris Polian a promotion and a hefty pay raise.

Expect Bill Polian to be the team’s president at least the next two seasons. His contract runs through 2011. But he’s a lot closer to 70 than 60. And while Howard Mudd and Tom Moore have redefined what can be done in pro football after the age of 65, they don’t face near the day-in-day-out pressure Bill Polian does.

Since Bill Polian’s act has worn a little thin (for various reasons) on the local fan base this year, maybe it’s the right time for Chris to start sharing center stage. It’s time Chris Polian finds out that being an effective team president is about more than making the right personnel decisions. Like it or not, it’s also part sales, part marketing and part fan-relationship building.

Maybe Chris Polian isn’t ready for his own radio show—or to answer questions about the team’s take from Lucas Oil Stadium revenue, but it’s time he starts fielding some of those tricky press inquiries. It’s time he start pondering how to address a sometimes hostile fan base. It’s time he step out from the shadows and into the limelight.

Because his future—and the Colts’ future in this town—depends on it.

In the end, there’s no end run around that.

  • Bill Polian
    The Colts GM showed a total lack of class when he blamed the offensive line for the loss (an its was not true). How many sacks did they allow compared to Minnesota's offensice line: 0 vs. about 5? Further the Colts running game was quite good. In truth it was really a total team loss. The offensive line did allow some pressure but that was partly because the receivers did not often get open. The Saints' defensive backs gave very tight coverage when it counted. The Colts could not score from the 7 yd line and 1st down. In contrast the Colts defenive backs had very loose coverage especially on key downs. This allowed NO to play ball control. The Colts special teams obviously did not practice smothering onside kicks in non-obvious situations. And they did not have a long range field goal kicker--where were you Polian? For a lot of this you have to also blame the coaches. They were clearly outcoached in every way. Do we need more younger, smarter coaches?
  • on third base
    I think Bill Polian woke up on third base and thought he hit a triple. Peyton Manning sure is making him look good. It's No. 18 that makes the Colts go, not Polian's drafting. BP is on a slippery slope. He should be taking these great times to reach out and plant deeper roots with the local fan base, but hacking those relatioships to bits.
  • 1-6
    BP has a great 'bargain basement' eye. He's the Bobby cox of football. He's been the top dog on 6 SB trips and has won one of them. His assessment of the NO loss made no sense, at least from an analytical point. Like everything else he does, I suppose it was 'measured and coded' to reflect something going on in the organization not designed for public consumption.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............