Will the truth, and a touch of sincerity, free Tiger Woods?

February 19, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Professional sports enterprises are full of people trying to forget the past.

Golfer Tiger Woods—now known by legions as “The Cheetah”—will be the latest to join that club today.

Maybe Woods consulted with Bill “what’s past is prologue” Polian for advice in advance of his 11 a.m. press conference.

Or perhaps he discussed strategy with Bill Belichick, who has forgotten more about secretly video taping opponents than most people ever know. Belichick is the only guy I know who uses the line of “it’s in the past” to dodge an issue that happened two minutes ago.

Of course Mark McGwire is a solid case study for Tiger. Remember, he’s not here to discuss the past.

Even if he doesn’t want to remember and/or discuss it, certainly Woods will have to address the past—at least on some level. While it appears from today's press conference Woods is addressing the past internally, there's no indication how he'll deal with it when the spotlight is on. Early indications are that he'll deal with it delicately.

The truth is, all people have one foot in the past and one in the present. And maybe a toe in the future. Remembering and learning from the past, turning that into a present day payoff is what allows us to pave a brighter future.

Pro athletes, coaches and historians all know this.

There’s a common saying in sports; “You’re only as good as now.” That’s true, but you don’t think Polian, Colts Coach Jim Caldwell and his staff and quarterback Peyton Manning aren’t dissecting every aspect of last season so they can better script the next Colts chapter.

Besides, pro sports is built on remembering the past.

We have Hall of Fames built to memorialize past accomplishments, we name all-pros in every sport at the end of every year based on the season in the rearview mirror, college athletics have all-America honors and teams retire numbers based on great past accomplishments. In fact, no one remembers—and profits from—the past quite like professional sports properties.

Good grief, throwback uniforms have become a cottage industry. The good old days are fine when they sell.

Truth is, when it’s about greatness, sports types are all too eager to not only remember the past, but etch it in cast iron and erect it for all to see. That’s why there’s a statue of Michael Jordon in front of the United Center and that’s why there will someday be a statue of Peyton Manning in front of Lucas Oil Stadium.

When the past is sullied, when it’s painful—and that pain outstrips the profit—or when they plain don’t feel like explaining mistakes, the ringleaders of pro sports trot out the tired lines about the past. And there's as much mis-remembering as there is remembering. That gem was brought to you by Roger Clemens, who threw away his Hall of Fame career in lieu of telling the truth.

But there’s always value in remembering the past. He may not want to talk about it publicly, but even Bill Polian knows that.

Living in the now is a great concept. When it comes to dealing with past transgressions, it’s also one of the world’s greatest dodges. As an absolute, we know it doesn’t work.

That’s why it’s time we cast aside the likes Ari Fleischer, who carefully scripted McGwire’s baseball re-entry. It’s time to stop the surly responses when fans come looking for explanations that quite frankly they’re owed.

The past is the past. And it’s no more easily forgotten rather its glorious, disastrous or just plain disgraceful.

Smart guys like Polian, Belichick and Woods know that.

And it’s time the puppet masters of pro sports start acting like the fans know that too. And trot out the truth. No spinning or script necessary. Indignation need not be applied.

Under this strategy, fan contempt will stagger and be slain.

And only then will the prologue lead to a truly happy ending.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Tiger
    Anthony:

    Add one item. It really gets old hearing the transgressors say "I made a terrible mistake" as Tiger said.

    By definition, a mistake is an unintentional action. There is no way that Tiger made that many indistretions without intention. I submit that he committed all of those acts intentionally. That, my friend, is not a mistake.

    I often wonder why someone in the media doesn't call him out for it.

    Someone should........
  • Too much
    They don't call you out when you're the kind of cash cow Tiger is. When you're not worth much to anyone and your career is more or less over (Fuzzy Zoeller) the press, fellow athletes and sponsors have no problem throwing you to the wolves. Well, athletes and coaches hardly ever turn on their own kind, but you won't see the level of support Tiger is getting that's for sure.
  • Come back culture
    American culture loves a come back. Tiger, and his handlers, like many before them, have carefully crafted today's press moment, and the public moments which will follow. Athletes and celebrities, who have the ability to draw in large amounts of cash, will always be able to fall from grace and rebuild their image. The golfing world sees dollar signs and they want him back on a golf course so they can sell tickets, hats, shirts and most of all, television broadcast rights. This is why Kobe Bryant is still popular, Fuzzy Zoeller sells out his golf tournament, Hugh Grant still makes movies, and Bill Clinton is treated like a combination rock star and senior diplomat.
    The definition of "mistake" is completely irrelevant. Americans love a come back, and Tiger has started his.
  • Pathetic
    Our country is pathetic. We care way too much about pop culture figures and entertainers. They mean nothing to our everyday lives. Yet the things that do affect our everyday lives (govt policy, economic policy, etc), we find boring and care very little for. It's sad. Our constant desire for all things "Tiger" right now is a great example of why we should blame ourselves partly for our country's poor economic situation. We've let ourselves get distracted too easily by things that don't matter in place of things that do.
  • Who are you to say?
    IU Hoosiers, who are you to say what does and doesn't matter. It must be nice to be able to set the agenda for all walks of life. The truth is, sports provides jobs to a lot of people, and I'm guessing their economic impact covers a broad spectrum of people in Indiana and the U.S. And even if watching or playing golf is just a pasttime that takes me away from the 40-hour a week grind. Who are you to say I'm wasting my time. One man's waste of time is another man's passion.
  • Tiger
    It was a beautiful, but unnecessary apology. His sin was private, not public, and he did not owe the public an apology.namaste
  • namaste and Titus
    namaste - you are ridiculous. He's in the public eye and subject to public scrutiny. That's the way it is. What cave do you live in? His apology was not "BEAUTIFUL". It cannot be when you LIE.

    And titus, lying is not irrelevant. He should have said the truth. He's living a cursed life, full of addictions. WHAT HE DID WAS NOT A MISTAKE. It was INTENTIONAL.

    You guys take the cake.........
  • go with it
    I gotta go with BWG. It was not a beautiful apology. It wasn't even beautifully scripted. I would be a little more sympathetic if I didn't think the end game was more about restoring Tiger's golf career and marketing ability than it is about truly making contrition and retribution for the errors of his ways.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT