There’s a feature on Sesame Street called “What doesn’t belong?” At least there was when I was a
kid.
You know the game. Big Bird shows four objects and one is unlike all the others. This feature always amused me, even as a
six-year-old, because it was so painfully obvious.
There on our living room TV screen would be three milk jugs and a rooster. And the sing-along jingle … “which
object doesn’t belong …” would blaze away in the background. It always made me smile.
I can’t help but envision that feature down on Sesame Street when I think of Butler University and the Horizon League.
Butler Athletics Director Barry Collier isn’t about to say the idea of jumping out of the 10-team Horizon League has
crossed his mind. But listening to him talk in the days following Butler’s march to the NCAA Championship game, I can’t
help but wonder if Butler is outgrowing its little league brethren.
No offense against the Horizon League, which is based in Indianapolis and has been instrumental as one of the hosts of the
Final Fours here, but Butler is no longer finding adequate competition there, certainly not in basketball. Butler went 18-0
in the conference this year and won the conference tournament.
The Horizon League is the perfect collegiate league for teams that want to compete in NCAA Div. I athletics, but don’t
want to break the bank. In many ways, it’s a healthier way to exist than the BCS conferences’ big-spending way
of life.
I should note here that Butler President Bobby Fong has told me several times that the school has no intention of spending
like the nation's biggest schools. Of course, that was before Butler threw its men's basketball coach a very big bone
to sit and stay.
Amazingly, a quick review of Horizon League team finances shows that Butler has become the N.Y. Yankees of the league without
outspending the competition like George Steinbrenner.
The Bulldogs are just barely above the league average in basketball spending, shelling out $1.7 million annually, less than
$100,000 over its league counterparts.
Butler’s overall athletics budget is in the $11.2 million range compared to the Horizon League average of about $9.98
million. Since Butler is only one of three Horizon League schools to have a football team, it would appear Butler is getting
quite a bang for its buck. Football teams aren’t cheap to operate.
But if you know Barry Collier, you know he’s a long way from satisfied with one run to the Final Four and a mid-pack
athletics program. That’s evident in the fact that he probably doubled Coach Brad Stevens salary last week. Now a $1
million-a-year coach in the Big Ten might not mean anything, but it’s three to four times what the average Horizon League
coach makes.
And when you’re paying a single coach 10 percent of your entire athletics department budget, you expect a return on
your investment. Collier might have left the coaches box, but he still thinks like a coach. Strategically, and most importantly
with a competitor’s spirit.
That spirit won’t let him rest. He wants to grow the Butler athletic department to new heights. That’s good for
the school, because it will bring it publicity in circles Bulldog alums and trustees never before imagined.
Collier’s no fool. He knows sustaining his vision of long-term ascension in college athletics takes money. And he’ll
only have Butler trustees' backing so long as the athletics department is self-sustaining. A school like Butler isn’t
about to let money be sucked away from academics into an athletics black hole.
Butler has lost their last three men’s basketball coaches to Nebraska (Collier), Xavier (Matta) and Iowa (Lickliter).
If Butler is to become the powerhouse Collier wants, he can’t afford to be losing any more of his top-flite coaches
to the likes of those schools.
If IU, Notre Dame or Duke come calling, that’s another kettle of fish entirely. But unless we’re talking about
football or wrestling, an aspiring sports power can’t lose their coaches to two niche sports programs and a private,
Catholic school that has never sniffed a Final Four.
So Collier and Butler stand precariously at a crossroads. Next year, his school is likely to own the Horizon League’s
biggest basketball and athletics department budget. He is already looking to leverage relationships with Duke and Purdue,
not only as a way to bolster publicity for the team and school, but as a way to generate some cash.
Butler is in a tricky situation, because it may not yet be in a place to command home-and-home deals with those schools,
but you have to believe Butler is now beyond making deals to play away games at places like UAB as it did this year.
Pre-conference tournament offers are likely to come-in, especially as long as Stevens is on Butler’s sidelines, but
that can only bring in so much cash.
A bigger conference, though, say the Atlantic 10, Big East or Mid-American Conference would bring a much bigger revenue-sharing
check.
And if Collier is able to continue to grow Butler athletics, is the Big Ten completely out of the question? At this point,
that scenario is difficult to imagine, but who knows?
It’s no secret the Big Ten wants a 12th school, but can’t find a suitable match. The Bulldogs could certainly
compete in basketball, but even the Big Ten’s smallest school, Northwestern, has a $48.6 million athletics budget. It
would take an incredible leap by a school still as much puppies athletically as Dawgs.
But coaches and athletes—and that is Collier’s background—are conditioned to think they can take on anyone
anywhere.
And after the Bulldogs’ narrow loss to the powerhouse Blue Devils, who can argue with that mindset?








IBJ Conversations
26 Comments
Add Comment
One glaring omission for me was the possibility
of joining the Missouri Valley Conference.
Home of Northern Iowa, Illinois State, Southern Illinois,
Bradley,Crieghton,Drake and of course natural rival and guaranteed sellout game
Indiana State.
It is 1-AA in football which would give Butler a better transition
for their program.
The facilities are top notch across the leauge and attendance exceeds Butler's
current numbers.
If not a natural choice at least one that makes some sense.
Your Thoughts? Your readers?
It will be a Top 6 basketball league every year.
"a private, Catholic school that has never sniffed a Final Four.". Hmmm, let's see, in the last 5 years, X has gone to two Elite Eights, losing one game by 3 to Duke and the other by 6 to Pitt. I'd call that "sniffing a Final Four". That was farther than Butler had ever gone before this season. So, while we all applaud the Bulldogs great year, you're factually incorrect (and snidely so) in your comment re Xavier. Oh, and nice time clock you've got there at Hinkle. Great way to steal a game.
Butler to A-10 ... drives up travel costs and lost class time significantly.
Butler to Big East ... get real, and it drives up travel costs and lost class time significantly.
Butler to Mid-American ... football. End of discussion.
Butler to Mo Val ... again, greater travel and lost class time.
Butler isn't leaving the Horizon League.
I dont know what your definition of "sniff" is but Xavier has been to the Sweet 16 twice and the Elite 8 twice in the last seven years. I think they may have caught a whiff...
Butler lost Matta to XU because it has a better program, in a better conference that spends more on basketball because they are smart enought to realize that is where they will make their money. Or they could waste money on a Division I FCS football team that is a cost center for the university. Perhaps that is why he left?
It doesn't seem like you really have a firm grasp of the facts so maybe I shouldn't expect you to be tethered to the truth either.
As Butler alum, I must ask why the need to make comments that would distance some of those very people (some XU fans I know personally were Dawgs backers last week) that routed on our Bulldogs.
You are likely going to reply that you were stating facts, but the way you used niche and sniff were opinionated and carried negative tone. If you print in the IBJ this weekend, consider omitting paragraph 16. Others may not be quite as for giving of the negative inuendo wrapped around "private, Catholic school". Futhermore, a more accurate and informed description of Xavier would be "a private Jesuit university".
Butler in the Big Ten is absolutely laughable. They would have to spend tremendously higher amounts of money to even field teams in all the Big Ten sports and they would get killed in almost every sport.
Plus, academically Butler is a poor fit as all of the Big Ten schools are large research dollar institutions which Butler is not and Northwestern is the only school that isn't huge and even they dwarf Butler.
Something like the Atlantic 10, Missouri Valley, MAC, etc. would be a much better fit and the more likely option.
Why would the Big Ten want Butler? I can't think of a single reason why they would be a good candidate. They don't expand the footprint of the Big Ten Network as something like Rutgers or Missouri would so they add nothing from a tv revenue standpoint. They draw very poorly in basketball and football vs. Big Ten schools so they add nothing from a revenue standpoint there either. Where is the win for the Big Ten in this? I just don't see it. If the Big Ten adds another school it will likely be one that adds a substantial new tv market, and draws at least close to Big Ten levels for basketball and football attendance. They are better off to just stay pat and wait for the right opportunity than to add a very poor fit like Butler.
Oh, I almost forgot, Xavier is awesome! (Quite possibly the greatest basketball program known to man) And Butler stinks!
I know that I stuck with the singular first name only moniker, but did I change my writing style enough to fool you?
He's talking about Notre Dame never sniffing the Final Four, at least not since 1978. IU and Duke are certainly the niche programs reference above, since they are known exclusively as basketball schools.
Put down the pitchforks, people.
If the B10 expands to 16 (via 2 8-team divisions) as they are currently discussing, they will pull from B12 and B-East --Rutgers, Missou, BC & others. This will force a chain reaction -- either Texas/Oklahoma to SEC or Bama/LSU to B12, then SEC will grab from ACC, ACC will grab from B-East and so on.
The result will be programs like Providence and Depaul becoming "free agent" programs. With the amount of free agent programs this could produce, it's anyone's guess as to how it could shake out. Of course, the B10 will need to expand to 16 first, which is either a 100% guarantee or a 0% fat chance depending on which blog you're reading at the time.