NCAA signs new TV deal despite financial losses

April 22, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The NCAA has a problem.

The golden goose laid an egg—and it wasn’t golden.

This year—despite Butler University's wonderful story—the NCAA’s broadcast partner, CBS, didn’t turn a profit on the three-week NCAA men’s basketball tournament.

What that means essentially is that CBS didn’t make enough in ad revenue to cover the huge rights fee paid to the NCAA and cover production costs.

The NCAA is eight years into its 11-year, $6 billion deal with CBS, which has broadcast the tournament since 1982. The NCAA has an opt-out clause that kicked in after this year’s Final Four, and is exploring expanding the tournament from 65 to 96 teams next year and bidding the package out for bigger bucks.

Jim Isch, NCAA interim president, was supposed to reveal the decision at an executive committee meeting April 29.

The problem apparently wasn't as big as once supposed, because this morning word leaked out that CBS and Turner have agreed to a 14-year, $10.8 billion deal to broadcast the tournament. NCAA officials are holding a 12:30 p.m. press conference reportedly to discuss the deal.

This development is most interesting. And this is why: Sources close to the network said CBS intended to ask for financial relief from the NCAA because the current/previous deal is/was heavily backloaded. If the NCAA does not opt out, CBS will owe $2.13 billion over the last three years of the deal.

That put the NCAA in a very tricky position. Either the Association sticks with a bird in the hand, albeit a bird that is likely to be squawking for more grub, or they re-bid March Madness on the heels of CBS’ revenue-loss revelation in the teeth of a still uncertain economy.

Apparently NCAA found a way to make this work for all concerned. The total package may be bigger, but I don't think it's likely the NCAA will be getting the $710 million annually over the next three years it would have under CBS' earlier deal.

Either way, cable cash is needed to prop up this deal. Cable stations benefit from two revenue streams—advertising and cash from cable company subscriptions.

ESPN was also eager to jump in the fray, but was shut out by the CBS-Turner alliance.

But Turner isn’t about to jump in for nothing. They want the Final Four on alternating years.

I can’t believe that people deride the Indy Racing League’s decision to move to the Versus cable channel, but there’s been hardly a peep about the NCAA moving its tournament games—including the Final Four—to Turner.

At least Versus has a mission statement centered on sports. Sure, Turner has done a solid job with the National Basketball Association, but they’re just as well known for airing cartoons and classic movies.

When the notion of tournament expansion was first reported in IBJ in December, the NCAA was looking for a more productive goose.

You can't blame the NCAA for grabbing at a bigger deal. After all, the cash from the men's tournament accounts for 98 percent of all the NCAA's revenue.

Still, you have to wonder about the wiseness of the NCAA's decision that essentially reduces the reach of its prized possession, and all the while praying those futuristic eggs don't turn out hollow for its broadcast partners.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Just the beginning
    Welcome to the new economy. Spectator sports are going to have a tough way to go for the foreseeable future.
  • Tru who?
    What the heck is Tru-TV? Seems unlikely CBS/Turner will be able to drive more ad revenue out of this. Won't the ratings of the games be cannibalized since CBS/Turner will be airing 4 games simultaneously. Still lots of unanswered questions here, and I believe some serious miscalculations by CBS/Turner.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Saw the Indy Men's Chorus "Music of Gilbert & Sullivan" at the Indiana Historical Society on Sunday evening.

  2. Temporary workers are not "tools" they are people and companies that keep large amounts of temp staff are cheating.

  3. I miss having them around. I hope one of their stores is in the general Meridian/86th Street area. I will make good use of it.

  4. The Fringe! Plus, the simple fact that there are so many local faves in such close proximity to each other.

  5. I remenber, watching the toll road, being built, through South Bend, when I was 10 years old. I believe, back then that it was estimated, that the toll road, would be paid for in 20 years and then it would be free. I am now 71, what happened? Since the power is in the people, by that, I mean that, we the people are in total control of everything. I, suggest that no one ever use the toll road again, let it go broke. We the people can control the price of everything, from groceries to gas, if we would just do it. If we don't pay the asking price, the sellers will lower the price and if we wait awhile, they will lower the price to what we accept as reasonable. I would like to know why a highway like interstate 94, is so well maintained, a much better highway, than the toll road, but has no tolls. I would also like to know why, a sitting governor, with a term limit, maximum of eight years, can lease, public property, for 75 years. Even though I have transponders in both of my trucks and will not be affected by the increase, I have been and will contine to avoid using the toll road. I make many trips from northern Indiana to Chicago, every year, and I prefer the better highway, I94!

ADVERTISEMENT