Larry Bird will build Pacers around his head coach

April 29, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

There’s a simple reason why Indiana Pacers basketball boss Larry Bird didn’t fire Coach Jim O’Brien. And it has nothing to do with Bird’s belief that O’Brien can turn around the Pacers’ flagging fortunes.

The reason sits on the Dallas Mavericks’ bench.

You see, Bird has never gotten over the firing of his friend, Rick Carlisle. Deep down, Bird thinks he betrayed his long-time friend, and in the process himself.

For once, Bird let the tail wag the dog, and now he’s determined to never let that happen again.

This whole scenario should tell Pacers fans a lot about Bird’s mindset—which by the way, he never intentionally sheds much light on.

While Bird was a players’ coach during his three-year stint on the Pacers bench, he’s become distrustful of at least some and probably most of the 12 men who play in between the lines and whistle blows in the blue and gold. He sees them as movable parts in his basketball machine.

He has become a coach’s GM. He has come to see the coach as the pillar with which all things must be built around and on. You can see this in his recent public statements about players needing to get used to the coach because the coach isn’t going anywhere.

Bird knows well that O’Brien might not be his man. But he is reminded by watching Carlisle pilot the Mavericks to the second best record this year in the Western Conference this year what siding with the players has cost him.

The Mavs may drop their first-round series to the San Antonio Spurs (they trail 3-2), but that won’t change Bird’s mind about Carlisle being the one that got away.

So you’ll see O’Brien play out his contract next year. After that you’ll see Bird go after someone in his own mold, a premiere no-nonsense coach who will stay put and build the team.

If the players cry about the coach or tune him out, you’ll see them moving on long before Bird parts prematurely with another coach. Expect to see Bird honor his coaches' contracts. Expect him to bring in and keep the players' his chosen coach wants, never the other way around.

And best yet for the Pacers, I think Bird’s approach is one in the end, that blue and gold faithful will find very appealing.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Lots of Assumptions
    Wow - you give lots of credit to Bird for actually having a thought or plan - let alone being able to execute it. I have seen no evidence of either of these in recent years.
  • Carlisle no better than O'Brien
    Carlisle didn't build the Mavs team. He's coaching a better bunch of players than Bird brought here. If he were still here, the Pacers wouldn't have done any better than they did with O'Brien - maybe worse. The Pacers need re-tooling, from top to the bottom. People who know how to build and a coach a team.
  • FALLOUT
    The Pacers are still reeling from the fight in Auburn Hills. Artest, Jackson, Tinsley, et. al. are responsible for this meltdown. Sure, Walsh brought them in, but they are responsible for their own actions. Whether its Bird, Carlisle or O'Brien, I agree w/ Scoop, they need to be rebuilt, from the bottom up. They need a top 5 draft pick to build around, not necessarily a specific coach. The coach is an important piece of the puzzle, but only a piece. Keep your fingers and toes crossed for good results in this years lottery!
  • Re: FALLOUT
    TOTALLY agree with you BK. Couldn't have said it better.
  • The CBA is the key
    Assuming you are accurate the next Collective Bargaining Agreement could be exactly what makes your assessment realistic. I see no way the players don't lose something in the next CBA. The current arrangement makes it too difficult to replace players so it is much easier to replace the coach. Assuming their salaries are reduced and other things happen to reduce the players control then yes building around your coach may work - under the current NBA structure this makes no sense unless you want to miss the playoffs every year as you will have zero chance of getting the talent needed to win a division much less a championship. The Pacers have to be one of the worst teams in the NBA when you look at their salaries versus their number of wins. You would be better off with a team at the minimum salary expense under the CBA requirement - you certainly wouldn't have a worse record than this bunch has produced - you might break even as an owner and you might get a shot at a top 5 draft pick. This team is the worst of all worlds - over paid - under performing and no chance to get a top free agent or a top draft pick. I would hate to see them leave but wouldn't lose any sleep if they did.
  • Re: FALLOUT
    TOTALLY agree with you BK. Couldn't have said it better.
  • Agree with Scoop
    Furthermore, if Bird is thinking this, he is jeopardizing another year to sub-par performance by sticking with O'Brien. This is a business. Bird needs to go, so does Morway and Oâ??Brien. And if Herb isnâ??t commented to winning, he needs to sell the team. Heck, with 6.1 millions Hoosiers, tax everyone $50 and weâ??ll buy the team. Then I wonâ??t feel so bad about paying the $15 million through the CIB annually.
    • Tuned Out!
      The players totally tuned O'Brien out this past year. How can anyone be optimistic about next year with him as the leader. So, we can look forward to another year of lower ticket sales and the same lousy record.
    • WRONG!!!
      WHO WROTE THIS ARTICLE???? It talks about the playerâ??s need to get along with the coach or he will â??moveâ?? them?? Thatâ??s continuity for you!!! The only way you win in this league is to have players that know each other and can work together. When you keep bringing in 6 or more new players EVERY year, you are NOT going to win. KICK THEM BOTH TO THE CURB!!!!
      I also like how it says, he became â??distrustfulâ?? of the players on the court? PLEASE!!! We went to the NBA Finals in his last year as coach. And as far as Carlisle- the players- good players- had tuned him out. He is only winning in Dallas because he was handed a team with a bunch of talent and his owner cares and is willing to spend whatever money it takes to win!!!
      CRAZY sportswriters!!!
    • Don't Shoot the Messenger
      AS is just trying to rationalize some of this crap seeping from CFH.
    • Larry Bird
      So we are DOOMED to another losing season because Larry won't fire the coach, and he knows this going in? Great. I hope the next CBA does away with guaranteed contracts, because this is what has killed the Pacers.
    • Don't Blame the CBA
      The Lakers, Celtics, Magic, Mavericks have all flourished under the current CBA. Blame Donnie Wlash for the crazy Bender and Tinsly contracts. Donnie did one thing right - Reggie Miller - and that carried him and the Pacers for a long time.
    • Let's all be owners
      That's a great idea. Let's become the Green Bay Packers of basketball and let people buy the team!
    • amazing turn for Bird's image
      It really is amazing how quickly Larry Bird's legacy in this town has turned. He was beloved as a player and a coach, but as a basketball operations executive, he is constantly being roasted. I'm not saying that is right or wrong, I've just never seen the public (especially not here in Indiana) turn on one of its favorite sons so quickly. I'm not a Larry Bird defender, but in all fairness, the guy has only had the reigns of the team for two years. Pacers fans, further enlighten me as to your thoughts on Bird.
    • Bird
      In my opinion and I went to nearly every game during the Bird coaching years, I am not sure he said 10 words a game. With Miller, Jackson and Rose, did you need a coach? I think back to him rooted for the Celtics in the 2008 finals - he's not a Hoosier - he is a Celtic.
    • Let Bird run it his way
      If the media and everyone else would let Bird do things that need to be done the Pacers will be better off. Larry understands the the players on the court need to look a lot more like the vast majority of fans in the stands. When he mentioned this about three years ago the media attacked him as being racist. Just watch most NBA teams and when the majority of players on the floor are black they will almost never get the ball to the white guy when he is open for a good safe shot and some times just plain keeps the ball away from him. one of the reasons the recently completed NCAA final tournament game was such a great success and competitive was the players from both teams played together and looked a lot more like the majority of fans in the stands.
    • Yikes!
      Yikes Jerry, take it easy with that talk! Did you realize that Larry Bird recently credited the black servers, waiters and other workers at the French Lick hotels for teaching him how to play the game. You might check out the recently released documentary about Larry Bird and Magic Johnson. It might enlighten you about the man and what he stands for. As for the Pacers not needing a coach back in Reggie Miller's days. Nonsense. It wasn't until Larry Brown came along, and then later with Larry Bird until this group of players achieved their potential. Reggie will tell you that much. Same goes for Carlisle. He's helping Mavs achieve their potential. That's what any good coach does. Phil Jackson isn't winning with scrub players, but very few would dispute his prowess as a coach.
    • Legend
      Anthony, I am one that will never roast Larry Legend. Yes, he has made some mistakes, but Donnie Walsh made quite a few as well, but they were usually masked because of his selection of #31. Has anyone noticed the number of autographs Larry Legend has given to fans during every timeout at a Pacers home game? What other GM does that? His pick of Shawne Williams was a bust, but let's give him some time. Like previous entries have stated, it all started with the jerk Ron Artest and the malice in the palace. A devastating blow to a franchise and the beginning of the downward spiral. You can't blame LB for that, can you? Give the Legend some time, he has earned it.
    • Carlisle
      Carlisle's first round exit is another example of the Bird coaching staff falling short of expections. I still believe that during the Bird coaching years of 1997-2000, the players should be given more credit than the coaches - just my opinion.
    • Pacers need a star
      The Pacers need a star, not a bunch of guys who play well together. Look at the Cavs, Lakers and Magic -- they have at least one big star. Big stars put butts in the seats. The Pacers started to slide when Reggie left; and then the Pistons brawl.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT