Fight for Colts training camp could erupt into Civil War

June 3, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Anderson has been desperately trying to lure the Indianapolis Colts back to town for its three-week training camp since the NFL team vacated for Terre Haute in 1999.

Colts President Bill Polian cited Anderson fans’ “passion for the Colts” when detailing the reasons why the Colts are heading back to Anderson.

Really? The fans of Anderson love the Colts more than those in Terre Haute?

I doubt it.

Anderson’s desire to coral the Colts training camp has little to do with city officials’ and residents’ affinity for football.

And no, the 24,000 or so fans that venture to training camp for an early gander at the team aren’t going to offer a huge economic impact to the city.

Anderson officials are desperate to become more of a northern extension of Indianapolis and they want badly to gain the attention of the Indianapolis media any way they can.

For three weeks this August (and presumably in future Augusts), Anderson will get its chance.

And it won't just be the Indianapolis media. With the way the Colts are playing these days, expect ESPN, ABC, CBS and NBC to descend on Anderson. Already Terre Haute officials are lamenting the loss of national media exposure.

“The national coverage was something you could never begin to pay for,” David Patterson, executive director of the Terre Haute Convention and Visitors Bureau told the Terre Haute Star Tribune.

No central Indiana city needs positive local and national media coverage in a worse way than Anderson.

Let’s not forget, Anderson is still trying to re-make itself in the post-General Motors era. You see, everything’s not about football, although it appears that way some times in the Horseshoe Kingdom.

Anderson is a city that has seen its population plummet from 72,000 to less than 60,000 in the last 25 years. In the same time, the city has seen $10 billion in annual wages evaporate along with $156 million in annual tax revenue and $430 billion in industrial output.

Even in this economy, those numbers are a little difficult to comprehend. So you can see how a few million dollars in improvements at Anderson University would seem like small potatoes if this is the means to the end that Anderson officials think it will be.

This is all about getting businesses and venture capitalists with ties to Indianapolis (and perhaps beyond) to see Anderson for more than a rust belt poster child.

You have to credit Anderson’s efforts in what can only be described as difficult, some would say desperate, circumstances.

Anderson officials in recent years have hired marketers to try to promote the city, built the state’s largest business incubator off Interstate 69’s Exit 22 and drilled water wells in an attempt to lure food manufacturers and replacement jobs for those long-gone high-paying GM union gigs.

What better way to get Circle City’s attention than by partnering with their beloved Colts.

Anderson was so eager to get the Colts back, an Anderson City Councilman told me in February 2009 that he was “99 percent” certain the team was coming that year. That turned out not to be the case.

In 2005, when I visited Anderson to do a story on the city’s economic re-development, the then mayor and an economic developer pulled me aside and told me the city was positioning itself to lure the Colts’ training camp back.

I have been a little confused by Anderson officials’ obsession with trying to get the training camp back.

No doubt they’ll try to spin every media type that ventures their way to their economic development landmarks and blueprints.

I hope it has the intended effect.

At the same time, I doubt this civil war is over.

I have no doubt Terre Haute is already scheming ways to get the Colts training camp back.

And now I’m hearing Franklin is mounting its own strategy to get in on the game.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • No different then any other piece of economic development. if this were a museum or a factory, the cities would be fighting over it as well. if you have a product two cities want, then let them fight it out. That is capitalism at its finest.
  • Issue
    The problem is this is not two businesses seeking work (capitalism) but rather two municipals spending taxpayer dollars for benefits that are likely inflated.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT