Isiah Thomas hire could mean end of road for Walsh in N.Y.

August 9, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Former Indiana Pacers President Donnie Walsh must feel like he’s jumped out of the frying pan and into the fire.

The Pacers have faced some challenges over the years, but at least it’s not like living through an unending episode of "As The World Turns."

Listening to sources throughout the National Basketball Association, only one conclusion can be reached. Walsh’s days as president of the New York Knicks are numbered.

Somehow, incredibly, Isiah Thomas, has worked his way into the good graces of Madison Square Garden Chairman James Dolan, who is Walsh’s boss.

Dolan last week hired Thomas to the ambiguous position of consultant, and sources close to the team say the former IU star is already angling for Walsh’s job.

Walsh was so upset by the hire, according to reports, that he almost quit. Walsh’s contract with the Knicks runs through 2012, and he has said recently he’d like to stay to try to turn around the storied franchise. That was all before Thomas entered the scene with his million-dollar smile and his assurances—that most NBA insiders agree aren’t worth 2 cents—that he can help recruit the likes of Carmello Anthony and Chris Paul to New York.

Yes, this is the same Thomas who ruined the Continental Basketball Association, got on Larry Bird’s bad side while coach of the Pacers and was run out of Indiana, then was an absolute disaster on so many levels while serving as boss of the Knicks. Walsh replaced Thomas as chief of basketball operations in 2008, then shortly after fired Thomas as Knicks coach.

We won’t even go into the sexual harassment lawsuit involving Thomas in New York. All that’s on the Internet.

What’s less well known is that Thomas has been working Dolan since the day he was replaced by Walsh, and somehow managed to gain Dolan’s trust. Thomas was glued to Dolan’s side at Dolan’s July 4 party in Long Island last month.

“Isiah is just so charming,” said one NBA insider.

Thomas is still the head men’s basketball coach at Florida International University, but that won’t keep him from swooping back into New York full-time if the opportunity arises.

Walsh meanwhile is struggling with his own set of challenges. He whiffed on the big three free agents this off-season, and the addition of Amar’e Stoudemire isn’t likely to lift the Knicks too far out of the cellar.

Walsh pleaded with Dolan to let him hire former Pacers (and Golden State) player Chris Mullin as Knicks general manager and Dolan vetoed the move. If Walsh doesn’t have any other health concerns, he’s certainly developing an ulcer over all of this. And who said the L.A. Clippers had the wackiest management in the NBA.

Dolan certainly seems like he’s making more than his share of missteps, but you have to wonder what Walsh was thinking when he went to work for this guy. Dolan’s style is in stark contrast to the steady-as-she-goes Mel and Herb Simon duo that Walsh worked for here.

So what’s going on inside Walsh’s head these days? It’s difficult to say. He isn’t talking to reporters much.

But one thing is certain. It seems like an awfully long time ago since Walsh drafted Reggie Miller over IU grad Steve Alford, and his genius emerged here in Indianapolis.

And even longer yet since the day Walsh hired Thomas to follow Bird as Pacers head coach.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Someone knows more than you do
    What NY does isn't as much of an issue here as the dude that wrote this. Thomas and Bird never got along even in the playing days, so what's up with the dumb comments that Thomas got on Bird's bad side. So far as I can see both Bird and Walsh didn't get much done, and haven't done much for the Pacers lately. Walsh's star dimmed years ago; Bird? how about the Artest stuff? How about the directio the Pacers have gone since Bird landed here? So what if Thomas gores back to NY and Walsh falls into the sunset?
  • Someone knows more than you do
    David ShirmeyerAugust 9, 2010 2:20 PM
    What NY does isn't as much of an issue here as the dude that wrote this. Thomas and Bird never got along even in the playing days, so what's up with the dumb comments that Thomas got on Bird's bad side. So far as I can see both Bird and Walsh didn't get much done, and haven't done much for the Pacers lately. Walsh's star dimmed years ago; Bird? how about the Artest stuff? How about the directio the Pacers have gone since Bird landed here? So what if Thomas gores back to NY and Walsh falls into the sunset?
  • Good for Thomas
    What NY does isn't as much of an issue here as the dude that wrote this. Thomas and Bird never got along even in the playing days, so what's up with the dumb comments that Thomas got on Bird's bad side. So far as I can see both Bird and Walsh didn't get much done, and haven't done much for the Pacers lately. Walsh's star dimmed years ago; Bird? how about the Artest stuff? How about the directio the Pacers have gone since Bird landed here? So what if Thomas gores back to NY and Walsh falls into the sunset?
  • Thomas Must Have Photos
    I do not understand how 'Zeke' could be hired by the Knicks in any capacity. He destroyed the franchise. Walsh is rebuilding it. He must have incriminating photos of James Dolan. Personally, Both 'Zeke' and Larry should retire in every way from the NBA and let people who know what they are doing off the floor actually do it. Both were legendary players but are awful front office guys. The only reason Zeke's hire won't be fatal to the Knick franchise is because they are in New York. The Pacers could well end up dead or moved.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

ADVERTISEMENT