Colts spurn conventional wisdom to win over fans

August 10, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Colts continue to move the yard markers on their march to making themselves a model NFL franchise.

And I’m not talking about on the field. As a business, more than a few NFL executives will tell you that few teams—small market or large—do it like the Colts.

Of course, having a championship caliber team to sell doesn’t hurt. Nevertheless, 240 team sponsors and a 17,000-long season-ticket waiting list are nothing to sneeze at.

The Colts have added 20 new sponsors this year and grown their season-ticket waiting list by 6,000 in the last year. Merchandise sales were up “a strong double-digit” percentage last year, and are up a more modest double-digit percentage this season, according to officials for MainGate, the company that handles Colts merchandising.

Those things didn’t happen all by themselves. The 240 sponsors is well above the league average of 190. Granted, because the Colts are in a smaller market than many of their NFL brethren, some of those sponsorships are smaller than your typical NFL team sponsor.

Still, a solid feat, and that’s not the only category the Colts exceed the league’s average.

Colts officials said the 844 state-wide appearances made by the team owner, mascot, cheerleaders and players is nearly double what most of the other 31 NFL teams made in the last 12 months.

That’s an average of 2.3 appearance by team personnel every day, 365 days a year. Those visits range from youth football and cheerleader camps to “just say no to drugs” speeches, fitness clinics and hospital visits.

With Lucas Oil Stadium already sold out, it would be easy to let fan outreach slide. But the Colts haven’t let the “build and they will come” mentality slip in.

“Marketing and branding the team never stops,” said Tom Zupancic, Colts senior vice president of sales and marketing.

It’d be easy to be a cynic here, and say the Colts sell because they win, simple as that. And I think that’s partly true.

But the Colts, first under Ray Compton, then later under Zupancic, smartly wandered to the path less traveled.

In 2000, the team abandoned its traditional television, print and radio marketing campaign to invest more in personal community visits from team representatives.

The Colts didn’t do it because it’s cheaper. The team still has a healthy multi-million dollar marketing budget, Zupancic said. They changed direction because they thought the new path would be more effective. So far, Colts officials have been proven right. Naturally, the real test will be when the team isn’t as competitive.

“I know we’re atypical,” Zupancic said. “It requires a lot of manpower. A lot of my marketing people are on the road all summer.”

Atypical, yes. For example, Colts owner Jim Irsay hired Greenfield native Josh Bleill, an Iraq war vet who had both legs blown off by a roadside bomb, as a team ambassador.

Was that a nice gesture by Irsay to give a disabled war vet a job? Perhaps. It also turned out to be a smart marketing and public relations move.

Bleill has become a fan favorite at games, even leading the performance of the national anthem. He also made more than 110 community visits on behalf the team in the last year. Bleill just completed a book about his journey that will be released in conjunction with the Colts opener this year.

Is Indianapolis a football town? I’m still not sure about that.

Does Indianapolis love a winner? Doesn’t everyone?

Will Lucas Oil Stadium be full when Peyton Manning is sitting on a beach and the Colts are fighting just to get into the playoffs—or worse?

There are no guarantees. And true fan loyalty isn’t easy to score.

But that answer might be found somewhere on the path less traveled. Zupancic and Irsay certainly hope so.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • LOL
    Indy a football town?! Please don't make me laugh so hard!! You will see Indy's true colors when Peyton retires. They will be just like the Pacers are now.
  • Proud
    Hmmmm. Me thinks Maria cheers for another team. I believe the Colts organization is second to none. They are nothing short of amazing. Indianapolis must be proud!!
  • I disagree w/ Maria
    While life will be different after Manning, unless the Colts jump into the stands and knock the crap out of a few fans, get some players suspended and throw away a season I doubt they will sink to the depths the Pacers have. While a winner always has a full bandwagon, the Colts are doing all the right things now to establish generations of fans that will pay dividends for a long time. As long as the Colts have the leadership of Jim Irsay and Bill Polian, Indianapolis will have a team to be proud of for many years. The Pacers should get a clue and take notice.
  • football town
    One thing you need to look at in determining fan following for a sport within a region is youth participation. Youth football participation in Indiana is up about 70 percent over the last decade. The same can be said for soccer, lacrosse and rugby, and I'm not sure anyone would call Indianapolis a soccer, lacrosse or rugby town. But football is a decades old sport with much larger participation numbers than those three other sports. So the increase in youth participation cannot be overlooked. I think the Colts have had a lot to do with that increase in youth football, and that could translate into winning those kids over long-term as Colts fans. Indiana as a football state? More likely than some might think.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT