I’m not sure who was in the room when the Big Ten honchos decided on calling the two divisions of the soon-to-be 12-school
conference, Leaders and Legends. I’m sure that after those names were widely panned after Monday’s announcement,
that few are standing up to have their attendance in that meeting or participation in that decision counted.
Thank goodness, the conference didn’t decide to change its name in the wake of luring Nebraska from the Big 12. Who
knows what kind of moniker they would have landed on?
“All I can tell you is that we thought long and hard about what not to do,” Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany told
reporters during a conference call Monday.
Then apparently after the Big Ten brain trust thought long and hard about what not to do, they went ahead and did it anyway.
I’m no sports marketing expert, but it seems some type of directional reference might have made more sense (though
I understand the divisions were not chosen along directional lines), or at least some type of regional reference (i.e., Great
Lakes Division).
Surely, naming the divisions after iconic coaches (or even players) would have been embraced to a larger degree, though picking
which coaches might have caused a furor among Big Ten athletics directors.
How about a choice of colors? Black and Blue. OK, maybe Blue and White to refect the new conference logo. Heck, Lemon Lime
Green and Tangerine Orange would make almost as much sense as Leaders and Legends.
But then again, I didn't finish at the top of my journalism school class. In fact, I don't even have a journalism
degree. So maybe I'm missing something. Let's go to the tape.
“What we’ve tried to do here is not get stuck in the past but build off the past, to pivot off the past and recognize
the past but also to think in new ways, in innovative ways and to move forward,” Delany said.
Translation please.
“We've tried to blend a recognition of where we’ve come from with the possibilities of continuing to aspire
to build great lives for future leaders,” Delany added.
OK. Got it. Clear as mud.








IBJ Conversations
15 Comments
Add Comment
I suppose it's better than the Dirty Dozen?
Tony Kornheiser summed it up best: Should have called them "SEC Victims" and "Future SEC Victims"
http://www.bigten.org/
making
"Ten Plus Three" when another school is picked up.
http://philiptortora.blogspot.com/2010/12/new-big-ten-divisions-are-joke.html
Who in their right mind thought of this and then didn't at least do some sort of market survey to see what the public thought. haha
Heads and Tails, Stars and Stripes, White and Whole Grain, anything is better than what was picked.
How much did they spend on the marketing company who came up with this? One question...with all the negative feedback and public humiliation, is there any chance they will rethink this and choose different names? Put up a contest on the BigTen website and choose the best answer. guarantee that would be a lot cheaper and you would get better ideas than what they came up with.