Butler becomes cradle of coaching

April 4, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For a team from the Horizon League to lose arguably the best player in school history and still make consecutive NCAA men’s basketball championship game appearances is beyond astounding.

And rightfully, that storyline is getting a lot of attention as the Butler Bulldogs prepare to play the University of Connecticut for the men’s NCAA title tonight in Houston.

But Butler has an equally impressive accomplishment notched in its belt. The fact that Butler has found, hired and nurtured four successful coaches in a 15-plus-year span is almost unparalleled.

In the time that Indiana University has struggled to find a suitable replacement for Bob Knight, Butler has had strong seasons under Barry Collier (now the school’s athletics director), Thad Matta, Todd Lickliter and now Brad Stevens. And I’m not just picking on IU. Lots of NCAA Div. I schools in football and basketball have struggled to find the right coach for their system. Some of them have struggled repeatedly.

The fact that Lickliter struggled at Iowa and Collier to a lesser degree at Nebraska only serves to reinforce the point. Butler somehow, some way, gives its coaches what they need to succeed.

Of course, no Butler coach has succeeded the way Stevens has, and that has put more pressure on the small school nestled near Broad Ripple. Last year, Butler granted Stevens a 12-year contract extension that sources close to the deal said pays him between $750,000 and $1 million annually.

Lots of credit goes to Butler President Bobby Fong and Athletics Director Barry Collier for finding the right talent and providing an atmosphere for the school’s coaches to succeed. But it’s also important to remember former Butler President Geoffrey Bannister, who in the late 1980s hatched the idea of turning the men’s basketball program into a power that could be used as a marketing tool for the larger school. Significant credit also goes to John Parry, who served as Butler’s athletics director during from 1990-2006, a time of significant growth.

After this year’s run, the school may be forced to consider another pay raise for Stevens. Bigger schools will certainly continue to knock on Stevens’ door.

But maybe Butler officials have less to worry about than it appears. After all, Butler has a record of finding hidden gems to replace hired-away coaches. And an even more impressive record of providing an environment where those coaches can succeed.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Respect
    As an alumn I am very proud of this school and the RESPECT that they teach and expect from their students.I hope that we can keep our fine COACH and we will certainly miss the leadership of President Fong in the future.
    • Forgot?
      Let's not overlook the impact of Butler basketball by Paul D. (Tony) Hinkle.
    • Butler talent
      Seriously, does anyone not think that IU has more talent than Butler, but there is a huge gap in coaching. While one coach pleads that things will be different once he has all of his Parade All Americans, while the other coach just coaches what he has just a bunch of 3 and 2 star recruits to back to back national championship games?

      Coach'em up Brad!
    • Go Butler!
      I said it before, but I do very much respect Coach Stevens and the Butler team.

      go Butler!
    • Stevens
      If Coach Stevens is to look for role models, let's suggest he turn back to Coach Hinkle. Tony spent a career and a lifetime at BU. The fieldhouse that has become a basketball icon bears his name. There is a legacy worth more than a higher salary at a bigger school.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

    2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

    3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

    4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

    5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.

    ADVERTISEMENT