Butler becomes cradle of coaching

April 4, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

For a team from the Horizon League to lose arguably the best player in school history and still make consecutive NCAA men’s basketball championship game appearances is beyond astounding.

And rightfully, that storyline is getting a lot of attention as the Butler Bulldogs prepare to play the University of Connecticut for the men’s NCAA title tonight in Houston.

But Butler has an equally impressive accomplishment notched in its belt. The fact that Butler has found, hired and nurtured four successful coaches in a 15-plus-year span is almost unparalleled.

In the time that Indiana University has struggled to find a suitable replacement for Bob Knight, Butler has had strong seasons under Barry Collier (now the school’s athletics director), Thad Matta, Todd Lickliter and now Brad Stevens. And I’m not just picking on IU. Lots of NCAA Div. I schools in football and basketball have struggled to find the right coach for their system. Some of them have struggled repeatedly.

The fact that Lickliter struggled at Iowa and Collier to a lesser degree at Nebraska only serves to reinforce the point. Butler somehow, some way, gives its coaches what they need to succeed.

Of course, no Butler coach has succeeded the way Stevens has, and that has put more pressure on the small school nestled near Broad Ripple. Last year, Butler granted Stevens a 12-year contract extension that sources close to the deal said pays him between $750,000 and $1 million annually.

Lots of credit goes to Butler President Bobby Fong and Athletics Director Barry Collier for finding the right talent and providing an atmosphere for the school’s coaches to succeed. But it’s also important to remember former Butler President Geoffrey Bannister, who in the late 1980s hatched the idea of turning the men’s basketball program into a power that could be used as a marketing tool for the larger school. Significant credit also goes to John Parry, who served as Butler’s athletics director during from 1990-2006, a time of significant growth.

After this year’s run, the school may be forced to consider another pay raise for Stevens. Bigger schools will certainly continue to knock on Stevens’ door.

But maybe Butler officials have less to worry about than it appears. After all, Butler has a record of finding hidden gems to replace hired-away coaches. And an even more impressive record of providing an environment where those coaches can succeed.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Respect
    As an alumn I am very proud of this school and the RESPECT that they teach and expect from their students.I hope that we can keep our fine COACH and we will certainly miss the leadership of President Fong in the future.
    • Forgot?
      Let's not overlook the impact of Butler basketball by Paul D. (Tony) Hinkle.
    • Butler talent
      Seriously, does anyone not think that IU has more talent than Butler, but there is a huge gap in coaching. While one coach pleads that things will be different once he has all of his Parade All Americans, while the other coach just coaches what he has just a bunch of 3 and 2 star recruits to back to back national championship games?

      Coach'em up Brad!
    • Go Butler!
      I said it before, but I do very much respect Coach Stevens and the Butler team.

      go Butler!
    • Stevens
      If Coach Stevens is to look for role models, let's suggest he turn back to Coach Hinkle. Tony spent a career and a lifetime at BU. The fieldhouse that has become a basketball icon bears his name. There is a legacy worth more than a higher salary at a bigger school.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

    2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

    3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

    4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

    5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

    ADVERTISEMENT