Indians' all-star sales staff makes million-dollar gain

April 7, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Early last month, Indianapolis Indians General Manager Cal Burleson told me sponsorship sales for this season were running 10 percent above last season, and could spike even higher with two major sponsorship deals expected to be announced this month.

As a journalist, I’m paid to be skeptical. And I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been told about pending, even imminent, sponsorship deals that never come to fruition.

And in this economy, it’s always best to take a wait-and-see approach with such proclamations. But the Indians have made a living out of beating the odds, and since it’s a publicly traded company, I don’t have to take their word for it. I get to see the financial results each November.

So when Burleson called me early this week to tell me he wanted to talk about the two new deals and specific sponsorship revenue numbers for 2011, I knew he wasn’t just blowing smoke.

Burleson sat me down in his office inside Victory Field and explained that sponsorship revenue for 2010 was $1.6 million, and that the “stretch goal” for this season was $1.8 million. So when he plunked down a piece of paper showing me sponsorship revenue has hit $2 million, I could see this season is going to be a winner even before the first batter comes to the plate in tonight’s home opener.

And true to his word, Burleson unveiled two new sponsors; PNC Bank and Indiana Farm Bureau. Burleson called both deals among the biggest the AAA minor league baseball team has on the books. And they’re multi-year deals.

The five-year deal with PNC includes sponsorship of PNC Plaza inside the main entrance to Victory Field at the corner of West and Maryland Streets. It also includes sponsorship of four interactive games within the plaza, signage throughout the centerfield concourse, on picnic tables and on directional signage inside the venue.

Indiana Farm Bureau signed a multi-year deal that makes the insurance company the “Official Insurance Provider of the Indianapolis Indians.” The partnership is part of the rollout of Indiana Farm Bureau’s new advertising campaign, and will aim to teach people more about the types of insurance coverage the company offers, said Farm Bureau Senior Vice President Thomas J. Faulconer.

The Indians organization has doubled its sponsorship revenue since 2007, Burleson said. A $1 million revenue gain is not insignificant for a franchise with operating revenue between $8 million and $9.5 million in recent years.

During the same four-year period, which included the worst economy this nation had seen in decades, many professional sports teams struggled to maintain sponsorships.

“We’ve succeeded by listening to the client, determining their needs and constructing a sponsorship package that meets those needs,” Burleson said. “With each success, it seems the door opens wider with other potential clients.”

It takes players to make big plays. And Burleson and Indians Chairman Max Schumacher have put together an all-star sales cast.

During our conversation, Burleson mentioned a few staffers who have helped fuel the revenue run-up.

Joel Zawacki, Indians director of corporate partnerships, not so coincidentally joined the Indians’ staff in 2007, just as the run began. Zawacki, a 2006 University of Indianapolis graduate, cut his teeth working internships for the Indiana Pacers and Brevard County Manatees, a single A farm club in Melbourne, Fla.

Zawacki downplays his role. “This has been a total team effort,” he said.

The numbers seem to bear that out. Long-time Indians staffer Howard Kellman, Burleson said, has achieved his best year ever in sponsorship sales. Indians fans probably know Kellman better as the team’s play-by-play broadcaster, but he devotes a fair amount of his workday to sales. Burleson said Kellman has been selling sponsorships for the Indians for more than 30 years.

In recent months, Randy Lewandowski has taken over the Indians’ corporate partnership department, and Burleson said he’s “provided excellent direction and focus.”

Burleson also credits Keri Oberting, the corporate sponsorship service coordinator, and said the department has been energized by newcomers Amanda Murray and Christina Toler.

  • Play ball!
    Congratulations to the Indians. It's hard to believe Victory Field opened 15 years ago. In that time the Indians have provided good value for fans and continued to put money back into the place.

    And while I'm sorry to see my favorite seats in the left field corner disappear, I can't wait to enjoy a cold Sun King in the new Captain Morgan's Cove and root, root, root for the home team.
  • Minor League Ball in a Major League City
    While I'm happy that the Indians are flourishing by providing fun and affordable entertainment, I don't believe the task they've achieved is anything extraordinary.

    Indianapolis has a minor league team in a city that should be supporting major league ball. There are at least 19 MAJOR LEAGUE teams who play in less populous areas than the Indians.

    A nice stadium in a great downtown location that has a huge fan base for doesn't take a genius to make that succeed.
  • Wow
    The Pacers just made their first playoff berth in 5 seasons & this is more news worthy? Granted this pertains to business more, but seriously give notice where it's due. Thank you & GO PACERS!
  • huh?
    Can you even name 1 player on the Indians. Sorry, but I follow sports because of the players. I know people go to the games because of the atmosphere, but you could put in high school teams and no one would notice the difference. Minor league is minor league. Not for me.
  • Indy's Size
    While Eric makes a point that Indianapolis could possibly support a major league franchise, I don't know where he gets his data. According to a list of mean statistical areas (MSA) by size, Indianapolis is only larger than the Milwaukee area in population when you look at cities that have major league teams.

    I fully support the expansion into Indy, but let's keep in mind that we would be not just a small market team, but a micro-market as far as MLB markets are concerned.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

  2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

  3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

  4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

  5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.