Workouts weaken NFL, NBA players' negotiating position

July 5, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Being a self-motivated self starter is a wonderful trait.

But there is a faction who wonders if NFL and NBA players’ willingness to organize their own team workouts during their respective lockouts makes them appear a little too eager—or even desperate—to get back on their field or court.

Player-organized workouts, some agents and player union bosses are warning, could compromise the players’ negotiating position with owners.

While workouts are designed to put players in a position of strength on the field, self-organized post-lockout drills could put players in a position of weakness at the bargaining table.

Maybe that’s why the Indianapolis Colts players have been so stealth in organizing their workouts. No one is more calculating than Colts quarterback Peyton Manning. Others, including New Orleans’ Drew Brees, have been open about workouts, allowing in the media and occasionally the public to get a glimpse of the drills.

Early on, the NFL players launched a “we want to play” publicity campaign, but labor experts now wonder if that strategy—including the high-profile players-run workouts—is backfiring.

There’s already much discussion about which player is going to step forward to organize the Pacers’ off-season workouts during the NBA lockout, which began July 1. There’s no shortage of media members who think it would be wonderful if Danny Granger or Roy Hibbert stepped up into the organizational void created by the lockout to keep the players in shape and ready if and when a season tips off.

But as the NFL lockout drags on, some NBA and NFL agents are telling their players to stay away. The theory is, if you’re not on the payroll, you shouldn’t be risking your health, jeopardizing your future or burning your own personal time for a team owner that is trying to slash your pay and other benefits. Besides, some have argued, it’s the team owners’ and managers’ responsibility, not the players’, to organize off-season workouts.

Agents and union representatives for Major League Baseball players warned their players against self-organized practices and workouts during the 1994-95 lockout. And many stayed away. Not that MLB has necessarily been a model for how to handle labor disputes.

For most NFL and NBA players, operating under lockout conditions is new terrain. There’s nothing in their years of playing the game—from rec league to college—that has prepared them to diagram a play for this sticky situation.

And there’s no workout that will make this dilemma go away.

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT