Workouts weaken NFL, NBA players' negotiating position

July 5, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Being a self-motivated self starter is a wonderful trait.

But there is a faction who wonders if NFL and NBA players’ willingness to organize their own team workouts during their respective lockouts makes them appear a little too eager—or even desperate—to get back on their field or court.

Player-organized workouts, some agents and player union bosses are warning, could compromise the players’ negotiating position with owners.

While workouts are designed to put players in a position of strength on the field, self-organized post-lockout drills could put players in a position of weakness at the bargaining table.

Maybe that’s why the Indianapolis Colts players have been so stealth in organizing their workouts. No one is more calculating than Colts quarterback Peyton Manning. Others, including New Orleans’ Drew Brees, have been open about workouts, allowing in the media and occasionally the public to get a glimpse of the drills.

Early on, the NFL players launched a “we want to play” publicity campaign, but labor experts now wonder if that strategy—including the high-profile players-run workouts—is backfiring.

There’s already much discussion about which player is going to step forward to organize the Pacers’ off-season workouts during the NBA lockout, which began July 1. There’s no shortage of media members who think it would be wonderful if Danny Granger or Roy Hibbert stepped up into the organizational void created by the lockout to keep the players in shape and ready if and when a season tips off.

But as the NFL lockout drags on, some NBA and NFL agents are telling their players to stay away. The theory is, if you’re not on the payroll, you shouldn’t be risking your health, jeopardizing your future or burning your own personal time for a team owner that is trying to slash your pay and other benefits. Besides, some have argued, it’s the team owners’ and managers’ responsibility, not the players’, to organize off-season workouts.

Agents and union representatives for Major League Baseball players warned their players against self-organized practices and workouts during the 1994-95 lockout. And many stayed away. Not that MLB has necessarily been a model for how to handle labor disputes.

For most NFL and NBA players, operating under lockout conditions is new terrain. There’s nothing in their years of playing the game—from rec league to college—that has prepared them to diagram a play for this sticky situation.

And there’s no workout that will make this dilemma go away.

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT