I’m not here to proclaim that hosting a Super Bowl or even having a National Football League team is going to cure
all of a city’s economic woes. Obviously, it won’t.
But for those who doubt the big-time economic benefit of hosting a Super Bowl, I recommend spending a few days on the phone
with operators of local hotels, restaurants and meeting space.
I spent the last two weeks calling and visiting people on the tourism industry’s front line, those who feel the economic
benefit of such events first. Most of you who read this blog regularly know I can be somewhat cynical and skeptical of the
various spin doctors that inevitably come my way.
And after covering the convention and tourism beat for more than seven years for IBJ, I have discovered that hoteliers and
restaurateurs are the last people to pull punches. They generally tell it like it is.
If the economic impact figures thrown around for the Super Bowl—$250 million to $450 million—are a sham, I knew
these people who often work long hours and are used to relatively thin margins would tell me so.
I was amazed at what I heard. Without exception, of the 17 people I called for the story that appeared in this week’s
IBJ print edition, everyone said they expect the week of the Super Bowl, which is to be played Feb. 5, will be the largest
on record for Indianapolis from a financial standpoint. And they expect it to be so by a wide margin.
It’s important to differentiate economic impact from direct visitor spending. Direct visitor spending is the amount
of money the event directly generates. Economic impact uses a multiplier effect where, for instance, a waitress makes 50 percent
more in wages and tips during the Super Bowl and goes down to the corner store and buys some clothes or other goods. The owner
of that store in turn spends the money somewhere else in town.
After reporting my story, I have no problem saying the economic impact for the Super Bowl in Indianapolis will easily surpass
$250 million. And I’d say that direct visitor spending might actually approach that number.
If there’s anywhere near $250 million in direct visitor spending, there’s little doubt the total economic impact
is at least $450 million. After all, all that money earned isn’t getting buried in backyards.
It’s true that some of that money goes to conglomerate hotel owners and out-of-state restaurant chains, and some of
that profit is funneled out of Indiana.
Still, there are plenty of local restaurant owners like Jeff Dunaway who operates a spot on the east edge of downtown who
expect to bring in a mid six-figure sum for the week. Locally owned Jillian’s restaurant, on Meridian Street in the
heart of downtown, expects to bring in $1 million.
Kahn’s Catering expects to keep 208 employees as busy as they’ve ever been during the Super Bowl week.
I was told by various sources—and my four-function calculator—that the average catering bill for the 130 or so
parties surrounding the Super Bowl will be $35,000. Some catering tabs will be six-figures. Some parties will run up $300,000-plus
tabs for food and beverage, party space, music and other niceties.
Dunaway said the groups looking for party space for the Super Bowl aren’t even asking about price. He expects to get
a 20-percent plus premium for his space, which seats 190 indoors, for the week of Feb. 5.
A conservative revenue number for hotels during the Super Bowl week is $50 million. Very conservative.
Another $15 million to $20 million will be spent on the NFL-sanctioned and unsanctioned parties and events in the week leading
up to the Super Bowl.
According to my sources and calculations, another $15 million will be spent at area restaurants. Actually, more than that,
but there’s some overlap with parties, so I scaled it down. If you don’t believe my numbers, ask St. Elmo Steakhouse
owner Craig Huse. He said he got his first call for a reservation for the 2012 Super Bowl in 2008. He expects walk-up waits
of three hours for a table at his restaurant during Super Bowl week.
Not surprisingly, Dunaway and Huse are planning extended hours that week.
That’s a thumb nail sketch of the impact. And the vast majority of this money comes from people outside of Indiana,
new dollars this region never would have seen otherwise.
I haven’t talked about revenue from airlines, limousines, taxis, car and tour bus rental, retail shopping or myriad
other factors. Still, very quickly, the direct visitor spending from the three things I picked is $85 million. Using a conservative
multiplier ratio, the economic impact of those few things I picked would be $212.5 million. Again, a conservative estimate.
And that’s before the game even starts.








IBJ Conversations
8 Comments
Add Comment
The only thing missing is the recently uncovered information by local bloggers that taxpayers will have significant unexpected "direct costs" and that our Superbowl committee didn't actually secure the $25 million in private contributions to throw this party.
Remember real profit or loss for the city is determined by direct cash revenue minus direct cash expenses.
We do know that the CIB will spend at least $8 million in Superbowl direct costs for police overtime among other things, then subtract the rent free convention center/football stadium/party venue space covered by taxpayers, then subtract the sales/hospitality tax exemptions given to the NFL/Colts, then subtract the state/city parking revenue given to the NFL/Colts.
No doubt other extra costs such as police/fire and many other things are being quietly funneled the city/county budgets of various agencies and other potential revenue for the city is quietly given away or forgone to the NFL/Colts.
Taxpayers just want a fair accounting of Superbowl direct spending/costs to see if we are really making a profit or loss.
Remember hosting this event was intended as a reward to taxpayers for building the Colts a new $750 million retractable roof football stadium of which all revenue goes to Jim Irsay and all expenses go to taxpayers.
Guess the CIB president Ann Lathrop forgot that when she stated, "Right now we are looking at a net loss of roughly $800,000. Lathrop said the goal of the CIB wasn't to make money off the Super Bowl but to help the city facilitate an event expected to generate millions in economic impact."
Let's stop guessing and start looking at solid independant analyses.
The blogs "had enough indy" and "advance Indiana" have looked at the tax returns of the non-profit SB2012, CIB, and city budget trying to figure out the truth. They uncovered several interesting facts.
The truth is no one is really trying to manage overall direct costs by taxpayers for this event and certainly they are not making an effort to fully disclose the finances to the public.
The SB2012 group is claiming they are a private organization exempting them from public disclosure, while the cities quasi-public corporations like the Sports Corp, Indianapolis Downtown, & CIB costs are not being totaled up by the City County Council or Mayors office.
Honestly I think they just have blind faith that the taxpayers will have a positive return on investment, yet no one is making sure those projections come true.
Don't expect accountability without serious research by our local media.
Don't expect the Star to take this on.
Don't expect any local TV or Radio station to look into it since it would take more than 30 seconds to explain.
Our only hope is the IBJ will step up and explain this to us after doing interviews and looking over financials.
Most major events have different levels of sponsorships with clearly disclosed participants in each level associated with a specific dollar amount.
I suspect that some of these "donors" are actually "fully compensated vendors and subcontractors".
Did they really raise $25 million in cash?
How are they spending the $25 million?