Irsay could pose roadblock to NFL's L.A. move

October 21, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It’s ironic that the last man rumored to be moving an NFL franchise to Los Angeles might now be one of the obstacles for a new NFL owner cropping up in the City of Angels.

No, Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay doesn’t want to keep L.A. vacant so he can move his team there at a later date. Even when he was negotiating with Indianapolis officials for a new post-RCA Dome home, Irsay denied that he was taking a serious look at relocating the team to L.A. Now that Lucas Oil Stadium is built, all the talk about the Colts moving to L.A. is ancient history.

But this month, Irsay again made big news in L.A. At the NFL owners’ meetings in Houston, Irsay came out against a proposal that would allow an ownership group to get a sizable slice of a team, say the Oakland Raiders, for a cut-rate price in exchange for helping finance an NFL-worthy stadium in Los Angeles.

The way Irsay sees this, it would be like your neighbor selling his $300,000 house for $150,000. A move like that devalues the entire neighborhood. And since NFL teams are valued not only on cash flow, but also on recent sale prices of other NFL teams, Irsay is dead set against AEG’s Philip Anschutz—or any other entity—acquiring a piece of an NFL team for anything less than market value.

Irsay isn’t thinking of selling his team. He just wants to protect its value.

And Irsay isn’t buying the notion that the NFL must be in L.A., one of the nation’s top two media markets.

“There’s been a feeling like we’re going to steal a deal because we’re L.A. and we’re such a big market, and you have to come here,” Irsay told the Los Angeles Times.

“The bottom line is, if an owner’s going to go in there, and if he’s going to sell 10 percent or 20 percent, he’s not going to sell it for $5 million a point,” Irsay added. “I think it could be a tremendous deal. I’ve always said that if it’s done the right way it’s going to be a great deal. But I think things have fallen apart there in the past because, quite frankly … no one’s going to steal a minority interest for an outrageous price.”

Anschutz is asking for a 30-percent to 50-percent interest in an NFL franchise at a discount in exchange for paying $1.3 billion to build a new stadium.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Bad Math
    Irsay's short sighted here - or more likely he's being presented that way. Let's take the most likely candidate for moving, the Jaguars. In 2010, the Jags were valued at $725m. Let's assume that value holds. Using the $5m a point, Jags owner Wayne Weaver (assuming 100% ownership, which isn't true), could get $250m for a 50% stake. That value would skyrocket with a movie to LA, well over the break-even point and would have some tax advantages for Weaver as well.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. This is still my favorite Mexican restaurant in town. What I do love about the new version is it is much quieter than the most recent version. TV's were off, the music wasn't too loud, and the wait staff were not hyperactive like they had been the past few times I had been there. I just wish they would bring back the MOLE for the enchiladas!

  2. Not a bad paper. There is a need for local community news and city government issues. Don't really need the owner's constant national political rants. We all know where they stand by now.

  3. What nice people. Menard should've known better than to team up with the guy who robbed and drove Conseco to ashes. I'm surprised Timothy Durham isn't involved in this.

  4. Hello, I am Maris Peters, currently living in Texas city, USA. I am a widow at the moment with three kids and i was stuck in a financial situation in August 2014 and i needed to refinance and pay my bills. I tried seeking loans from various loan Companies both private and corporate but never with success, and most banks declined my credit. But as God would have it, I was introduced to a Man of God a private loan lender who gave me a loan of $65,000USD and today am a business owner and my kids are doing well at the moment, if you must contact any firm or company with reference to securing a loan without collateral , no credit check, no co signer with just 2% interest rate and better repayment plans and schedule, please contact Mr William David. He doesn’t know that am doing this but am so happy now and i decided to let people know more about him and also i want God to bless him more.You can contact him through his email: Davidloanfirm@yahoo.com

  5. It is beyond me how anyone can think this was a "bad deal" for the state! If they could take the money back then, yes, but they can't! Protections were built in the agreement. Now, if they roll the roads up and take them away, I will agree that it was a bad deal. Otherwise, the only way to have paid for the infrastructure that was badly needed was for the state to issue bonds....that is a four letter synonym for debt folks!!

ADVERTISEMENT