Irsay could pose roadblock to NFL's L.A. move

October 21, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It’s ironic that the last man rumored to be moving an NFL franchise to Los Angeles might now be one of the obstacles for a new NFL owner cropping up in the City of Angels.

No, Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay doesn’t want to keep L.A. vacant so he can move his team there at a later date. Even when he was negotiating with Indianapolis officials for a new post-RCA Dome home, Irsay denied that he was taking a serious look at relocating the team to L.A. Now that Lucas Oil Stadium is built, all the talk about the Colts moving to L.A. is ancient history.

But this month, Irsay again made big news in L.A. At the NFL owners’ meetings in Houston, Irsay came out against a proposal that would allow an ownership group to get a sizable slice of a team, say the Oakland Raiders, for a cut-rate price in exchange for helping finance an NFL-worthy stadium in Los Angeles.

The way Irsay sees this, it would be like your neighbor selling his $300,000 house for $150,000. A move like that devalues the entire neighborhood. And since NFL teams are valued not only on cash flow, but also on recent sale prices of other NFL teams, Irsay is dead set against AEG’s Philip Anschutz—or any other entity—acquiring a piece of an NFL team for anything less than market value.

Irsay isn’t thinking of selling his team. He just wants to protect its value.

And Irsay isn’t buying the notion that the NFL must be in L.A., one of the nation’s top two media markets.

“There’s been a feeling like we’re going to steal a deal because we’re L.A. and we’re such a big market, and you have to come here,” Irsay told the Los Angeles Times.

“The bottom line is, if an owner’s going to go in there, and if he’s going to sell 10 percent or 20 percent, he’s not going to sell it for $5 million a point,” Irsay added. “I think it could be a tremendous deal. I’ve always said that if it’s done the right way it’s going to be a great deal. But I think things have fallen apart there in the past because, quite frankly … no one’s going to steal a minority interest for an outrageous price.”

Anschutz is asking for a 30-percent to 50-percent interest in an NFL franchise at a discount in exchange for paying $1.3 billion to build a new stadium.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Bad Math
    Irsay's short sighted here - or more likely he's being presented that way. Let's take the most likely candidate for moving, the Jaguars. In 2010, the Jags were valued at $725m. Let's assume that value holds. Using the $5m a point, Jags owner Wayne Weaver (assuming 100% ownership, which isn't true), could get $250m for a 50% stake. That value would skyrocket with a movie to LA, well over the break-even point and would have some tax advantages for Weaver as well.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT