IndyCar, NASCAR drivers face off in Fieldhouse kart race

November 1, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

NASCAR and IndyCar drivers are set to square off Dec. 11 in a go-kart racing challenge inside Conseco Fieldhouse.

The first Bridgestone Karting Classic is being run in conjunction with the third annual International Motorsports Industry Show held at the Indiana Convention Center Dec. 8-10.

NASCAR drivers Tony Stewart, Austin Dillon and A.J. Allmendinger along with IndyCar racers Scott Dixon, Alex Tagliani and Jay Howard will headline the field, said IMIS co-founder Chris Paulsen. IMIS officials expect about six drivers from NASCAR and six from IndyCar to line up for the indoor go-kart race billed as a duel between the two series.

Former IndyCar driver Scott Goodyear, who is now an ABC/ESPN motorsports broadcaster, is one of the organizers of the karting event.

The event is being promoted as a day-long karting extravaganza. More than five different karting classes will be competing throughout the day culminating with the NASCAR vs. IndyCar race. In addition to the racing, Conseco Fieldhouse’s concourse will be filled with karting industry displays and representatives from karting tracks, karting manufacturers and other suppliers.

“Competitive karting remains one of the most pure forms of motorsports, so I’m looking forward to getting in a kart and racing some of the IndyCar guys,” said Stewart, who has World Karting Association and International Karting Association titles on his resume. “The Indy Karting classic is shaping up to be a cool day for karting enthusiasts. It should be a fun spectator event as well.”

Stewart, who previously raced in IndyCar before jumping to NASCAR, is a minority owner in the IMIS trade show.

Spectator tickets for the racing program are $15 for single admission or $30 for a Family Four-Pack. Tickets can be purchased through Ticketmaster or at the Conseco Fieldhouse box office the day of the race. More information can be found at or

  • Hello??
    I can't believe Chef didn't use this as a
    as a rant forum. Com'on, there aren't any
    F1 drivers here???

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.