College football playoff may be closer than people think

December 6, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

I woke up this morning wondering if I attended the same meeting with NCAA President Mark Emmert on Monday at the Hall of Champions as other local media outlets.

At least two reported that Emmert said an NCAA football playoff is deader than Oklahoma State’s national championship hopes.

That’s not what I heard. Still, I turned on my tape recorder to re-acquaint myself with Emmert’s take from Monday’s meet-and-greet with Indianapolis media.

“The fact that LSU and Alabama are playing again just adds fuel to a fire that has been smoldering a long time,” Emmert said. “The debate will be fast and furious between now and the BCS [championship] game.”

Emmert pointed out that the Bowl Championship Series current TV contract expires in 2013.

“I think it’s perfectly conceivable there will be interest in changing that model in some way, whether they move to the so-called plus one model or other things that have been out there and under discussion,” Emmert said.

“After this season will be the beginning of a great debate about what that model should look like. [The model] has changed a couple of times already in its short history, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it changed again. What that looks like is premature to speculate. I suspect there will changes in the format. If for no other reason because we’ve seen a lot of conference realignment and that’s caused the whole question of automatic qualifiers to be questioned and that will lead to some good debate as well,” Emmert added.

Well, that doesn’t sound like dismissing the idea. But Emmert went on.

“I expect lots of debate and discussion and probably some modification to the current format, but does that move to a playoff per se, we’ll have to wait and see,” Emmert concluded.

To be fair, Emmert brought up some of what he considers serious challenges to moving to a college football playoff, including increasing the length of the season and what impact that could have to players’ physical health and their academic pursuits.

“Total number of games is a huge issue and the impact on calendar is a great big issue as well,” Emmert said.

The final call on format changes will likely be made by the schools and conferences which created the BCS. But I would expect Emmert, as the NCAA's boss and a former university president, will have some input.

Does Emmert have concerns about the idea of a playoff? Yes.

Did he outright or even remotely dismiss the idea? Not hardly.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Playoff a burden?
    I find it amazing that a playoff in Division One college football is a burden to the athletes but not a burden to the athletes that play college football in Divsion 1-AA, 2 or 3. I guess that big time college football players are just dumber.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT