NBA owners need right to put franchise tag on players

December 9, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

If the new NBA collective bargaining agreement was all about competitive balance, by all appearances it’s been an abject failure.

The owners could have taken one simple step to significantly level the playing field all 30 NBA teams play on. But once again, players’ rights won out over what’s best for the whole of the league and more importantly for NBA fans nationwide.

Just days after a new agreement between NBA players and owners was announced, Chris Paul is holding the New Orleans Hornets hostage and Dwight Howard is doing likewise in Orlando.

It’s gotten so ridiculous that Paul and Howard are not only demanding trades, but have submitted a list of which select few teams they’ll play for.

This is how the game works: A player with one year left on his contract says he will not re-sign with his team and demands to be traded. Teams are apt to comply because if they trade the player a year before his contract expires they might get something in return. If they let his contract expire, the way Cleveland did with LeBron James, they get nothing and suffer an unsightly implosion when the player bolts for seemingly greener pastures.

The whole orchestration of the Miami Heat trio smelled bad to NBA fans. The deal that sent Carmelo Anthony to New York last year stank even worse, and the stench is rising once again.

Of course, the NBA has long been a league ruled by star players. Who doesn’t remember Magic Johnson getting Paul Westhead fired as the L.A. Lakers head coach in the 1980s? Penny Hardaway got Brian Hill booted out of Orlando 1997. Those aren’t isolated incidents.

It’s easy to say it’s a free market and it’s all about the money for these players. The new collective bargaining agreement—at least to some degree—addressed that. New Orleans could pay Paul about $40 million more over the long-term than any other team in the league.

Still, Paul wants to play with his friends in a big market, and with the current system he has all the power to do that.

Thursday night, NBA Commissioner David Stern stepped in and stopped a trade that would have sent Paul—one of the league’s best point guards—to the Los Angeles Lakers. Stern had the right to do that because the Hornets are currently owned by the league. He only did so after hearing a plea from several owners who said it reinforced the big-market bias.

But many today are asking what the end game is. What does Stern hope to accomplish long term? Eventually, whether it’s this year or next year, under the current system Paul will move to L.A. or New York. New Orleans may or may not get anything in return. Either way, the Hornets will be worse off.

All of these gyrations certainly don’t bode well for efforts by the Indiana Pacers—or any other small- or mid-market teams—to significantly improve through the free agent market. Instead of pursuing the types of players who can win championships and push fans through the turnstiles, the Pacers are forced to pursue players like George Hill and Nene. Solid players for sure, but not the kinds of guys who fill seats night in and night out.

The NBA could solve the problem by adopting the franchise tag system used by the NFL.

The franchise tag is a designation a team may apply to a player scheduled to become an unrestricted free agent. The tag binds the player to the team for one year if certain conditions are met. Each team may only designate one player each year as a franchise player.

An exclusive franchise player in the NFL must be offered a one-year contract for an amount no less than the average of the top five salaries at the player’s position, or 120 percent of the player’s salary in the previous year, whichever is greater. Exclusive franchise players cannot negotiate with other teams.

NBA players need to reign in their wanderlust and stop scheming to play where the lights are brightest and where their posse is gathering.

Instead they need to put down roots and play for the team that drafted them and in front of the fans who love them.

  • NBA Players
    Or the star players could all move out of small markets and cause half the teams in the league to go bye bye. It wouldn't be a very Merry Christmas if 200 NBA players couldn't get work in the 15-team league.
  • Say What?
    I am confused. How does putting a NFL franchise tag make things any different? It only gives the team one more year before they get nothing in return! And why are you suggesting players should not be allowed to determine where they work? Doesn't make sense. Bottom line is (specifically regarding the Chris Paul situation), New Orleans would actually be a better team accepting this trade but because of the idiotic rants of Gilbert, they will keep CP for one more year, he will leave and they will get NOTHING. How in the world is that in the best interest of the league?
  • Genius
    This is so simple, it's genius. Yes, the NBA definitely needs a franchise tag. Therefore I know NBA owners will never adopt it. Way too logical. And Blan Account, if you want to understand the franchise tag, go to Wikipedia and read how it works. It would do wonders to assure competitive balance in the NBA. That would benefit all teams in the long run.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.