NCAA goes public with hoops tournament selection criteria

January 6, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

NCAA officials are raising the curtain on the wizards making the selections and seedings for its men’s and women’s basketball tournaments.

The reasons behind the selections have long been questioned, and in recent years the NCAA selection committee has been more forthcoming about the selection criteria.

But this week NCAA executives said they are opting for complete season-long transparency, making all the information used in the selection process available to the public.

The information to be released will include the Rating Percentage Index data and in-depth team information known within college basketball circles as the “nitty gritty reports.” The nitty gritty reports include data on strength of schedule, performance against top 50 teams, conference and non-conference performance, and road and home records.

The selection data will be posted on the association’s website, NCAA.org, under the Rating Percentage Index tab. There, NCAA officials said, it can be tracked by media and fans on a weekly basis throughout the season.

“The bottom line is that the more we can do to enhance and further inform that discussion and debate through transparency, the more you can have thorough discussion,” said Jeff Hathaway, NCAA Div. I men’s basketball chairman. “When the field is announced, everybody will have had the opportunity throughout the regular season to go back and look at the information, just as if they were sitting on the committee.”

It has become an annual rite of passage each March for the media and fans to criticize the NCAA selection committee for at least some of its selections.

While transparency is always a good idea, in this case it will likely serve not to end the debate, but to shift it. There is bound to be as much discussion now about the criteria used in the selections as the teams that are selected. The BCS football bowl criteria have long been transparent. That hasn’t stopped the howling about inequities in the selection of participants in the bowl games.

And there will still surely be much debate about which basketball teams are sent where to play in the opening and regional rounds of the tournaments. Certain teams, especially those highly seeded teams and known for drawing good crowds in their backyards, have often been sent to play their games closer to home.

So let the games begin. And let the debate begin.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. "This was a very localized, Indiana issue," he said. As in, Indiana failed to expand Medicaid to cover its poor citizens resulting in the loss of essential medical services, including this EMS company. Well done, Indiana GOP. Here are the real death panels: GOP state governments who refuse to expand Medicaid for political reasons.

  2. In the "one for all, all for none" socialist doctrine the sick die...this plus obama"care" equates to caucasian genocide plus pushed flight to cities thus further eroding the conservative base and the continualed spiral toward complete liberal/progressive/marxist America.

  3. There is a simple reason why WISH is not reporting on this story. LIN has others stations in different markets that are affiliated with CBS. Reporting about CBS blindsiding WISH/LIN due to CBS's greed and bullying tatics would risk any future negoations LIN will have with CBS in other markets.

  4. My best always! Dave Wilson

  5. How did Columbus, Ohio pull off a car share service without a single dollar of public subsidies? They must not have a mayor who is on the take like Indianapolis. Daimler Benz offers Columbus residents their Smart Cars on a market-driven basis: "This has some neat features. Cars don’t have to be picked up and dropped off at fixed points. You find one with your smart phone based on GPS, and drop it off anywhere in the service area you can find a spot – even at a meter. These cars aren’t required to feed the meter so you get free on street parking while using them. I was told this system was put in place on a market basis without subsidies – and that the vendor actually pays the city for the use of the meters." http://www.urbanophile.com/2014/05/26/checking-in-on-columbus/

ADVERTISEMENT