Indy should cheer for Giants, Broncos, Pats or Packers

January 9, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In September, I wrote about the best Super Bowl match-up for Indianapolis in terms of economic impact.

Sports economists believe that certain NFL teams’ fans travel better to and spend more at a big event like the Super Bowl. Teams’ proximity to the Super Bowl host city and how long it’s been since a team has made a championship run also play a role in determining which teams bring the biggest payoff.

The ideal match-up can mean $10 million to $15 million in additional cash flowing into the host city.

Unfortunately, some of the dream teams have been eliminated. Gone are the Chicago Bears, Dallas Cowboys, Detroit Lions and New York Jets, all of which have rabid fan bases, large metropolitan populations and are a relatively easy drive—or flight—to Indianapolis.

Thanks to Denver Broncos quarterback Tim Tebow, gone, too, are the Pittsburgh Steelers, which has as strong a national following as any NFL team.

That doesn’t mean all is lost in terms of a super match-up. Far from it.

In fact, the unpredictability that is the NFL has brought about some scenarios that look pretty savory.

Though it’s a long shot, a very long shot, no one can deny the value Tebow would bring to the Super Bowl. Not only are Broncos fans rabid and likely to turn out in Indianapolis in big numbers, I think it’s safe to say Tebow’s appearance in the Super Bowl would likely drive the highest television viewer numbers any game has ever seen.

Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association CEO Leonard Hoops thinks the TV exposure the city gets during the Super Bowl—and the run-up to it—is at least as valuable as the dollars that pour into local merchants coffers during the week of Feb. 5.

Of the four AFC teams remaining—Denver, New England, Houston and Baltimore—there’s no arguing that the Broncos would be ideal in terms of economic impact.

But consider New England. There is plenty of wealth in the Boston area, but Pats fans haven’t always been the best traveling fan base. Throw in the fact that they’ve been to four Super Bowls since 2002, and their impact is anything but certain.

There’s one thing that might cause Patriots fans to come out of the woodwork—and travel to Indy and tune in on TV in huge numbers: a rematch against the New York Giants.

Remember, New York ended New England’s perfect season in the 2008 Super Bowl. You can bet Patriots followers haven’t forgotten. Sure, some of the players have changed from that 2008 game. But enough characters in this drama remain—namely quarterbacks Eli Manning and Tom Brady and coaches Tom Coughlin and Bill Belichick—to ratchet up the TV ratings in a big way.

The Giants would be the ideal NFC team for another reason. New York’s huge fan base loves to travel, and they’re a relatively short distance from Indianapolis. The last time the Giants played the Colts at Lucas Oil Stadium in 2010, I saw a large downtown restaurant a day before the game half-filled during lunch with New York City firefighters. They were far from alone in coming to cheer their team—and that was for a regular season game.

The New Orleans Saints and San Francisco 49ers, the other two remaining NFC teams, also offer intriguing story lines, though I’m not sure they’d bring the sizzle of the Giants or Green Bay Packers.

The 49ers are the NFL’s comeback team of the year under new coach Jim Harbaugh, but the distance from there to here might be a problem, especially in drawing fans who might not be able to get tickets but just might come for the atmosphere. The high-octane Saints are always entertaining, but leaving New Orleans for a party in Indianapolis might not sound so grand in February for the team’s followers.

So who should local merchants and tourism officials cheer for? It’s a tough call. Visitor spending isn’t likely to fall too far below $200 million no matter which teams make it.

But I’d say the absolute best in terms of maximizing visitor spending and TV viewing would be Broncos and Giants.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Giants Broncos would be the best. Although this would be the shortest distance for Packers fans to drive to a Superbowl. Bodes well for gas stations, but not airports.

    Ravens would be interesting story line, playing in the city that stole (per them) their team.

  • broncos giants
    Agreed - Broncos/Giants would be best game. Tebow vs Peyton's little bro in a year that Peyton couldn't play. That just sounds fun.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT