Despite not playing, Peyton steals Super Bowl spotlight

January 31, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The way the first full day at the media center at the JW Marriott went, you’d think the Indianapolis Colts were vying for the Lombardi Trophy.

One of the most talked about players? Not Tom Brady or Eli Manning, the two quarterbacks starting in the game at Lucas Oil Stadium.

Instead it was a quarterback who hasn’t taken a snap all year that was getting all the attention from the thousands of print, radio, television and web reporters from the U.S. and abroad assembled to cover this year’s Super Bowl in Indianapolis. Well, maybe not all the attention, but certainly a disproportionate share for a guy who has missed the entire season with a neck injury.

First, Colts owner Jim Irsay was bombarded at a press conference early Monday afternoon that was set up to spotlight the host city, its mayor, governor and local organizers. Irsay so tired of the questions he asked the hundreds of reporters present—many of them from Indiana—to instead ask Gov. Mitch Daniels about a possible presidential run. That drew a good round of laughter from the crowd and a wry, if not a bit weary, smile from Daniels.

But Irsay was in less of a joking mood when a herd of national and local reporters chased him down the hall at the JW Marriott and began asking him about the future of his team and of No. 18.

After patiently answering questions, Irsay said he would not discuss Peyton’s future this week, instead choosing to focus on Indianapolis, which is hosting its first Super Bowl, and hoping to impress the NFL enough to earn a second.

But Irsay wasn’t the only one to field questions about Peyton Manning. New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick was asked about No. 18, as was his starting quarterback Tom Brady.

You could almost hear an audible gasp and the eye rolls as a reporter from the NFL Network asked the first question about Peyton to the man known for skulking the sidelines wearing a hoody and a scowl. I suppose Belichick had it coming. After all, he brought up the specter of Peyton at his first press conference in Indianapolis Sunday night.

And I suppose predictably, Eli Manning, Peyton’s brother and the only Manning family member actually playing in the game, was asked about big brother. If Eli dodges tacklers Sunday as artfully as he dodged answering questions about Peyton’s future, the N.Y. Giants should be just fine.

The fascination with Peyton Manning goes far beyond the media and the borders of the state where he’s played his entire professional career. It appears that just about everyone with a passing interest in professional football wants to know about the future of one of the greatest quarterbacks to ever play the game. Three neck surgeries in less than two years have made his future anything but certain.

Though No. 18 hasn’t graced the field for the Colts this year, he certainly hasn’t faded from the public consciousness, which is pretty unusual in the what-have-you-done-for-me-lately world of professional sports.

A Street & Smith’s Sports Business Daily survey released this week illustrates the amazing staying power of Peyton Manning.

Peyton still ranks No. 3—behind only Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers and Brady as the NFL’s most marketable players, according to a broad sampling of sports business executives, analysts and media personalities.

If you’ve seen the recently released TV commercial where Peyton plays the part of an NFL official you know that his neck injury hasn’t hurt his comedic delivery. He’s still got it.

Eli, who’s having an all-pro season, is No. 7 on that list. The top five is rounded out by Drew Brees at No. 4 and Tim Tebow at No. 5. Troy Polamalu is at No. 6 and Cam Newton is No. 8. Those are some pretty big names for a guy who hasn’t played in a year to outrank.

What is Peyton’s future with the Colts? That’s anybody’s guess.

Where’s Peyton’s place in the world of professional football?

Clearly, his image, if not the man himself, is still on top of his world and at the epicenter of marketability.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Medical Info about Peyton?
    I am surpised that, will all of the speculation, that I have not seen the media try to get more info from a Medical Expert. I have heard that, after 3 neck surgeries, one wrong hit could leave Peyton paralyzed. If this is true, why would he take the risk of playing again.
  • Neck Injury?
    One good, er, bad hit could do it. More importantly, he's going to face two particular issues which (likely) cannot be reversed: constant (officially known as "chronic") pain and lack of mobility.

    It's going take off his "edge" and make him a lot less of a player than we've seen - still better than other QBs, but just not what we've come to expect from him. With new twins, his priority is no longer the game, but his family. Would you rather he leave the game now - with an expected "what if?" or play the game and see what happens (no surprises)?

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT