Irsay's 'all-in' mentality key to Indy's Super Bowl score

February 3, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Oftentimes, Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay is an all-or-nothing kind of guy.

Never was that more true than in the case of Indianapolis winning the bid to host the Super Bowl.

According to several people in on the early efforts to bring America’s biggest one-day sporting event to Indianapolis for the first time, Irsay was one of the biggest engines in the effort.

Not only was his rising clout among the other 31 NFL owners critical, but his willingness to forsake his own financial interests might have been the extra point that won the day.

“Jim Irsay was all in from the very beginning,” said Indiana University Athletics Director Fred Glass, who was president of the city’s Capital Improvement Board in 2007 and led the first effort to bring the game here.

“Jim Irsay had an opportunity to make money off of this thing that he passed on to make our bid more lucrative,” Glass said. “Jim gave everything he could, access to suites and everything else he had rights to within the stadium.”

Irsay also agreed to let the AFC championship team use the Colts Complex for the week. Ironically, that turned out to be one of the Colts’ biggest rivals, the New England Patriots.

Yes, Irsay's Colts got a sweetheart deal to lease Lucas Oil Stadium. But contractually, he had the right to squeeze even more out if the Super Bowl was played there.

It’s also true that the money generated from the game itself and the NFL Experience goes to the league and is mostly divided among the 32 teams. So Irsay does get a share of the windfall.

But many NFL owners who have some control over their home stadium try to withhold some of the income-generating functions from the Super Bowl bid and keep all of that for themselves.

That was the case with Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones in 2007. The Cowboys’ stadium holds about 35,000 more people for the Super Bowl than Lucas Oil Stadium; in Dallas’ first bid, Jones withheld a lot of money-generating possibilities from the bid.

In bidding for a Super Bowl, a host city usually gives a preliminary bid, then amps it up as the competition warrants through another two or three rounds. It’s a lot like a high-stakes poker game.

“We probably didn’t know exactly what we were doing, so we gave our last and best offer right off the bat,” Glass said.  

Because of that and Irsay’s generosity, Glass said, “Dallas felt Indianapolis’ hot breath on their neck.”

Jones’ hand was forced when he heard a number of owners were favoring Indianapolis. He gave up much of his stadium inventory—some at the 11th hour—and Dallas’ bid ended up being close to $20 million more lucrative for the NFL than Indianapolis’.

Still, at the 2007 spring owners meeting, after several rounds of voting Dallas only beat out Indianapolis 17-15 for the 2011 Super Bowl.

Indianapolis carried its momentum over in 2008, and won the 2012 bid.

Irsay, as zany as he is, probably doesn’t get enough credit for being a community supporter. Much of his desire to help his adopted home stems from the memories of how people in Baltimore felt—and still feel—about his dad, Robert.

“I’m a part of this city and I love it here,” Irsay said this week from the Super Bowl media center at the JW Marriott. “I think it’s important for me to do whatever I can for my hometown.”

ADVERTISEMENT
  • “I think it’s important for me to do whatever I can for my hometown.”
    How about writing a check to the CIB for the projected losses they expect from hosting the Super Bowl which was intended to community "reward" for building him a $750 million football stadium, rent free along with all the revenue?
  • Fred Glass Sold His Soul To Jim Irsay
    I cringe when I read Fred Glass's quote:

    “We probably didn’t know exactly what we were doing, so we gave our last and best offer right off the bat,” Glass said.

    Yes, this is from the man who gave a $750 million taxpayer funded football stadium to Jim Irsay, rent free, gave away every revenue source, and bankrupted the CIB.

    He should be ashamed for having worse negotiating skills than my 12 year old daughter.
  • Good for Indy
    There is so much money being pumped into this city in many service and restaurants that you cannot make a case for hosting the Super Bowl as being negative. I am in the real estate business and have seen people rent their homes for 500 to 4000 per night, have talked to limo companies pulling in 10,000 over the weekend and restaurants pulling in 100's of thousands of dollars from corporate clients. Beyond that, the press that this city is enjoying is tough to calculate. It puts us on the map as a great place to live and work and that won't go unnoticed when employers are considering Indy for relocation. I've heard only positive from national news media in how Indy has the best pre-game setup they have seen. It takes money to make money and our old Hoosier Dome stadium would be empty this weekend if it were still here.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT