Irsay's 'all-in' mentality key to Indy's Super Bowl score

February 3, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Oftentimes, Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay is an all-or-nothing kind of guy.

Never was that more true than in the case of Indianapolis winning the bid to host the Super Bowl.

According to several people in on the early efforts to bring America’s biggest one-day sporting event to Indianapolis for the first time, Irsay was one of the biggest engines in the effort.

Not only was his rising clout among the other 31 NFL owners critical, but his willingness to forsake his own financial interests might have been the extra point that won the day.

“Jim Irsay was all in from the very beginning,” said Indiana University Athletics Director Fred Glass, who was president of the city’s Capital Improvement Board in 2007 and led the first effort to bring the game here.

“Jim Irsay had an opportunity to make money off of this thing that he passed on to make our bid more lucrative,” Glass said. “Jim gave everything he could, access to suites and everything else he had rights to within the stadium.”

Irsay also agreed to let the AFC championship team use the Colts Complex for the week. Ironically, that turned out to be one of the Colts’ biggest rivals, the New England Patriots.

Yes, Irsay's Colts got a sweetheart deal to lease Lucas Oil Stadium. But contractually, he had the right to squeeze even more out if the Super Bowl was played there.

It’s also true that the money generated from the game itself and the NFL Experience goes to the league and is mostly divided among the 32 teams. So Irsay does get a share of the windfall.

But many NFL owners who have some control over their home stadium try to withhold some of the income-generating functions from the Super Bowl bid and keep all of that for themselves.

That was the case with Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones in 2007. The Cowboys’ stadium holds about 35,000 more people for the Super Bowl than Lucas Oil Stadium; in Dallas’ first bid, Jones withheld a lot of money-generating possibilities from the bid.

In bidding for a Super Bowl, a host city usually gives a preliminary bid, then amps it up as the competition warrants through another two or three rounds. It’s a lot like a high-stakes poker game.

“We probably didn’t know exactly what we were doing, so we gave our last and best offer right off the bat,” Glass said.  

Because of that and Irsay’s generosity, Glass said, “Dallas felt Indianapolis’ hot breath on their neck.”

Jones’ hand was forced when he heard a number of owners were favoring Indianapolis. He gave up much of his stadium inventory—some at the 11th hour—and Dallas’ bid ended up being close to $20 million more lucrative for the NFL than Indianapolis’.

Still, at the 2007 spring owners meeting, after several rounds of voting Dallas only beat out Indianapolis 17-15 for the 2011 Super Bowl.

Indianapolis carried its momentum over in 2008, and won the 2012 bid.

Irsay, as zany as he is, probably doesn’t get enough credit for being a community supporter. Much of his desire to help his adopted home stems from the memories of how people in Baltimore felt—and still feel—about his dad, Robert.

“I’m a part of this city and I love it here,” Irsay said this week from the Super Bowl media center at the JW Marriott. “I think it’s important for me to do whatever I can for my hometown.”

ADVERTISEMENT
  • “I think it’s important for me to do whatever I can for my hometown.”
    How about writing a check to the CIB for the projected losses they expect from hosting the Super Bowl which was intended to community "reward" for building him a $750 million football stadium, rent free along with all the revenue?
  • Fred Glass Sold His Soul To Jim Irsay
    I cringe when I read Fred Glass's quote:

    “We probably didn’t know exactly what we were doing, so we gave our last and best offer right off the bat,” Glass said.

    Yes, this is from the man who gave a $750 million taxpayer funded football stadium to Jim Irsay, rent free, gave away every revenue source, and bankrupted the CIB.

    He should be ashamed for having worse negotiating skills than my 12 year old daughter.
  • Good for Indy
    There is so much money being pumped into this city in many service and restaurants that you cannot make a case for hosting the Super Bowl as being negative. I am in the real estate business and have seen people rent their homes for 500 to 4000 per night, have talked to limo companies pulling in 10,000 over the weekend and restaurants pulling in 100's of thousands of dollars from corporate clients. Beyond that, the press that this city is enjoying is tough to calculate. It puts us on the map as a great place to live and work and that won't go unnoticed when employers are considering Indy for relocation. I've heard only positive from national news media in how Indy has the best pre-game setup they have seen. It takes money to make money and our old Hoosier Dome stadium would be empty this weekend if it were still here.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I could be wrong, but I don't think Butler views the new dorm as mere replacements for Schwitzer and or Ross.

  2. An increase of only 5% is awesome compared to what most consumers face or used to face before passage of the ACA. Imagine if the Medicaid program had been expanded to the 400k Hoosiers that would be eligible, the savings would have been substantial to the state and other policy holders. The GOP predictions of plan death spirals, astronomical premium hikes and shortages of care are all bunk. Hopefully voters are paying attention. The Affordable Care Act (a.k.a Obamacare), where fully implemented, has dramatically reduced the number of uninsured and helped contained the growth in healthcare costs.

  3. So much for competition lowering costs.

  4. As I understand the proposal, Keystone would take on the debt, not the city/CRC. So the $104K would not be used to service the $3.8M bond. Keystone would do that with its share.

  5. Adam C, if anything in Carmel is "packed in like sardines", you'll have to show me where you shop for groceries. Based on 2014 population estimates, Carmel has around 85,000 people spread across about 48 square miles, which puts its density at well below 1800 persons/sq mi, which is well below Indianapolis (already a very low-density city). Noblesville is minimally less dense than Carmel as well. The initiatives over the last few years have taken what was previously a provincial crossroads with no real identity beyond lack of poverty (and the predictably above-average school system) and turned it into a place with a discernible look, feel, and a center. Seriously, if you think Carmel is crowded, couldn't you opt to live in the remaining 95% of Indiana that still has an ultra-low density development pattern? Moreover, if you see Carmel as "over-saturated" have you ever been to Chicago--or just about any city outside of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT