Irsay's 'all-in' mentality key to Indy's Super Bowl score

February 3, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Oftentimes, Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay is an all-or-nothing kind of guy.

Never was that more true than in the case of Indianapolis winning the bid to host the Super Bowl.

According to several people in on the early efforts to bring America’s biggest one-day sporting event to Indianapolis for the first time, Irsay was one of the biggest engines in the effort.

Not only was his rising clout among the other 31 NFL owners critical, but his willingness to forsake his own financial interests might have been the extra point that won the day.

“Jim Irsay was all in from the very beginning,” said Indiana University Athletics Director Fred Glass, who was president of the city’s Capital Improvement Board in 2007 and led the first effort to bring the game here.

“Jim Irsay had an opportunity to make money off of this thing that he passed on to make our bid more lucrative,” Glass said. “Jim gave everything he could, access to suites and everything else he had rights to within the stadium.”

Irsay also agreed to let the AFC championship team use the Colts Complex for the week. Ironically, that turned out to be one of the Colts’ biggest rivals, the New England Patriots.

Yes, Irsay's Colts got a sweetheart deal to lease Lucas Oil Stadium. But contractually, he had the right to squeeze even more out if the Super Bowl was played there.

It’s also true that the money generated from the game itself and the NFL Experience goes to the league and is mostly divided among the 32 teams. So Irsay does get a share of the windfall.

But many NFL owners who have some control over their home stadium try to withhold some of the income-generating functions from the Super Bowl bid and keep all of that for themselves.

That was the case with Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones in 2007. The Cowboys’ stadium holds about 35,000 more people for the Super Bowl than Lucas Oil Stadium; in Dallas’ first bid, Jones withheld a lot of money-generating possibilities from the bid.

In bidding for a Super Bowl, a host city usually gives a preliminary bid, then amps it up as the competition warrants through another two or three rounds. It’s a lot like a high-stakes poker game.

“We probably didn’t know exactly what we were doing, so we gave our last and best offer right off the bat,” Glass said.  

Because of that and Irsay’s generosity, Glass said, “Dallas felt Indianapolis’ hot breath on their neck.”

Jones’ hand was forced when he heard a number of owners were favoring Indianapolis. He gave up much of his stadium inventory—some at the 11th hour—and Dallas’ bid ended up being close to $20 million more lucrative for the NFL than Indianapolis’.

Still, at the 2007 spring owners meeting, after several rounds of voting Dallas only beat out Indianapolis 17-15 for the 2011 Super Bowl.

Indianapolis carried its momentum over in 2008, and won the 2012 bid.

Irsay, as zany as he is, probably doesn’t get enough credit for being a community supporter. Much of his desire to help his adopted home stems from the memories of how people in Baltimore felt—and still feel—about his dad, Robert.

“I’m a part of this city and I love it here,” Irsay said this week from the Super Bowl media center at the JW Marriott. “I think it’s important for me to do whatever I can for my hometown.”

  • “I think it’s important for me to do whatever I can for my hometown.”
    How about writing a check to the CIB for the projected losses they expect from hosting the Super Bowl which was intended to community "reward" for building him a $750 million football stadium, rent free along with all the revenue?
  • Fred Glass Sold His Soul To Jim Irsay
    I cringe when I read Fred Glass's quote:

    “We probably didn’t know exactly what we were doing, so we gave our last and best offer right off the bat,” Glass said.

    Yes, this is from the man who gave a $750 million taxpayer funded football stadium to Jim Irsay, rent free, gave away every revenue source, and bankrupted the CIB.

    He should be ashamed for having worse negotiating skills than my 12 year old daughter.
  • Good for Indy
    There is so much money being pumped into this city in many service and restaurants that you cannot make a case for hosting the Super Bowl as being negative. I am in the real estate business and have seen people rent their homes for 500 to 4000 per night, have talked to limo companies pulling in 10,000 over the weekend and restaurants pulling in 100's of thousands of dollars from corporate clients. Beyond that, the press that this city is enjoying is tough to calculate. It puts us on the map as a great place to live and work and that won't go unnoticed when employers are considering Indy for relocation. I've heard only positive from national news media in how Indy has the best pre-game setup they have seen. It takes money to make money and our old Hoosier Dome stadium would be empty this weekend if it were still here.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?