Hosting another Super Bowl could deliver diminished return

February 6, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

There’s a part of me that thinks Indianapolis should NEVER host another Super Bowl.

I know, after the week we’ve had here in central Indiana, it sounds crazy.

I’m sure our image is going to get a major boost and I’m betting the tally for direct visitor spending is going to be very near a record $200 million for the week.

But something Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association CEO Leonard Hoops told me last week has stuck with me.

He said a city never gets as big a brand boost as it does from its very first Super Bowl. Hoops said another thing that struck me: You don’t host a Super Bowl for the direct visitor spending alone. You do it largely for the marketing bounce and the follow-up convention and tourism business that it drives.

Right now, after a week of temperatures in the 40s and 50s, little rain and even less snow, and with 8,000 volunteers more full of cheer than a band of elves at Christmas, this city is riding an all-time high.

And if another Super Bowl comes to Indianapolis, I fear our bubble could burst.

The Indianapolis Super Bowl Host Committee said Monday morning that it could try to land another Super Bowl as soon as 2017. And positive responses from NFL officials about this year's event are leading them to believes it's a possibility.

It’s true the Indiana Sports Corp. and the engine that hosts these types of events are unrivaled nationally. Much bigger cities have tried and failed to mimic what Indianapolis has done. Chicago is the latest.

But let’s face it: Indianapolis never had to face its most feared foe this week. Mother Nature never reared her ugly head. She instead sent kindly temperatures and gentle breezes to make us all feel good about the week.

Yes, Indianapolis had a preparedness plan to deal with just about any weather catastrophe. But just because streets are plowed and sidewalks salted doesn’t mean zero-degree temperatures and sub-arctic wind blasts are going to make people love Indianapolis.

And it’s true that Indianapolis has more hotel rooms connected to one another, shopping, restaurants and the convention center by enclosed walkways than any city in America. But being forced into those gerbil tubes sure is enough to make a person think about Miami beaches and Arizona sunshine.

Bad weather has a way of making other bad things happen as well. And any marketer will tell you, one disaster can unravel a decade of positive brand building in a heartbeat.

“I think we burned a lifetime of good karma in a week, and the culmination of that was the game,” said Mark Miles, 2012 Super Bowl Host Committee Chairman.

Never have truer words been spoken.

Almost nothing went wrong. We actually were forced to complain about the little things like the Super Bowl Village being too crowded or a scarcity of zip-line tickets. Those are merely signs of the event’s overwhelming success.

There were a few hearty wind gusts early last week that caused some tents to close for a couple hours. Those memories have long been buried deep beneath an avalanche of pleasant happenings in the Circle City.

About the only thing to complain about on game day was shrimp cocktail that cost $30. And that was out of the local host committee's hands.

ISC Chairman Joe DeGroff recently told me successes don’t make you want to slow down and they don’t make expectations dwindle. They make you hungrier. And he added that the ISC’s victories only make people ask for more.

But I wonder, how much more can this city deliver?

I have no doubt that the NFL is going to ask for an encore performance. But not in 10 years, as has been previously suggested. I believe after the local host committee led by Miles and CEO Allison Melangton rocked this town and the entire NFL and its 32 owners, they’ll be asked to host America’s most popular sporting event within the next six years.

Indianapolis isn’t the only one that gets a giant brand boost when the Super Bowl goes off this flawlessly. A noted sports business expert told me after Sunday night’s game that the NFL might now need Indianapolis as much as Indianapolis needs the NFL. After all, there’s no shortage of bigger cities that have failed to do half the job of hosting the NFL’s crown jewel that Indianapolis has.

That is just what we’ve asked for, Indiana University Athletics Director Fred Glass reminded me last week.

“When we built this venue, we hoped to get one Super Bowl,” said Glass, who was instrumental in crafting the deal to build Lucas Oil Stadium and the bid that brought the Super Bowl to Indianapolis. “All we wanted was just one to show the world what we could do and cause people to want us, and invite us to be a regular host.”

Even before the game kicked off Sunday, Glass concluded, “That’s absolutely realistic.”

It seems more realistic than ever now.

But can Indy—and its sports-business-minded leaders—live up to hype?

As they say in sporting circles, that’s why they play the game.

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • I can understand your concern, but you never turn down a chance to host an event like a Superbowl. It will be interesting to see how NY/NJ does hosting a Superbowl, not only in a cold weather city, but in an open air stadium. After that, other northern open air stadiums will quickly be taken off the list. Couple that with the monsoon endured during the Colts win in Miami, the "freak" ice storms that have hit Atlanta and Dallas when they hosted and the crime, dirtiness and poverty of New Orleans, the quaintness of Indy and the all weather stadium designed for the biggest game will be welcomed.

    The NFL learned this week the pent up demand of the northerners who want to attend Superbowl festivities but can't afford to fly thousands of miles to the southern coast to attend. This showed that people can drive a few hours and have a blast on a relatively inexpensive budget.

    Most importantly, never underestimate Indy's ability to raise the bar and do it better every time. We wrote the book on Final Four hosting, and we did it again with the Superbowl.

    So we welcome the Superbowl and any other major event. We will do as we always do and step up and hit it out of the park.
  • Hot Sales Leads
    Following up with attracting key non profit organizations and their events focused upon our Life Science, Manufacturing, Logistics, Agriculture, & Sports industry would be a smart strategy.

    It should be a target rich environment.
  • Hard to Repeat
    I think the success of this Super Bowl in Indy will be hard to repeat for two big reasons. First, we have to admit that we lucked out on the weather. This helped bring the crowds downtown. We were able to handle the logistics of hosting the big crowds downtown in a confined space. I don't know what the plans were in case we got 6 to 8 inches of snow but that's always possible. I am not opposed to hosting the Super Bowl, I'm just trying to be realistic. The other big issue is that I believe a big part of the turnout for the Super Bowl events here was due to the fact that it was the first time. If we have another event too soon it will not have the same novelty as this one did. That said, one of the great things is that the Super Bowl Host Committee no doubt learned things that will make our next event even better. Hello my no
  • On to the next big thing.
    We dodged the winter bullet. No need to tempt fate again. We've established that we do big events better than anyone, now let's move on to big SUMMER events. A Republican national convention, and, dare I even write it, the Olympics.
  • Comments spot on
    I was offered 3 FREE tickets to the game Sunday (thanks, but would rather watch on TV). Tix to the game were going for face value - or less - according to on-site tix brokers (game day tix in Dallas last year were $4,000 apiece). According to that same broker, we were looking at predominantly "local" traffic for Super Bowl week (neither the Giants' or Patriots' fans traditionally travel well and with Super 8 hotel prices at $300/night, we didn't do ourselves any favors in trying to attract them). Bottom line, we spent a lot of money and effort to entertain ourselves and pat ourselves on the back (we spent more to just acquire the game than we do on the arts in a DECADE! And the arts generate $500 million in revenue per year - not what will amount to a net loss when all the numbers are crunched). Bottom line, it's going to take some serious number crunching and re-crunching and prettying up to make another Super Bowl even appear remotely worth it. I think there are better and more worthy things this town needs to be spending its time and money on...and that $200 million we supposedly made? More than 80% of it goes right back out the door to national chains and etc. while the rest of it was just money re-circulated within the community - to go with the nearly one billion it cost us just to get the game and put it on (counting the stadium build). I for one am glad to see it go. For good. Self-congratulation and self aggrandizement be darned!
  • No Politics Please
    ScottD

    Yes, we need new events year round that repeat themselves here regularly.

    Sorry to tell you, but the U.S. lost bids to host the Olympics and World Cup just recently.

    Additionally political conventions are losers with very little upside considering protestors/civil disorder etc...

    Just look at Seattle's WTO meeting or Chicago's Democratic convention.
  • Great event
    I was there. Indy pulled it off like no other. This was my fifth Super Bowl in person. By far, it was the best. EVERYTHING about it was superb. Pat yourself on the back, Circle City.
  • Idiot naysayer
    All of you, including the articel writer really need to watch the WFYI documentary "Naptown to Super City". Nothing is more disgusting than something good happens to our community and many people try to offer their negative spin. There is no negative spin here. This city has come a long way and now to host two of the biggest sporting events is quite an accomplishment. Bring it back again within 5 years. The other things to spend money on that has been offered is garbage. Those "arts" and other community funding will only be more opportunistic as a reult of being a Superbowl host town. Indy is now arguably the sport capital of the world. Embrace that and all the ancillary benefits that come from that! You people that have commented negatively are perpetual pessimists and need to really look at the perspective and from where this town has come in the past 20 years!
  • Moderation
    I'm not sure that Indy needs to be or will have the chance to host the Super Bowl every five or six years like the Final Four. However, I think there are definitely gains from hosting a Super Bowl every ten or so years. Let me ask you this. How many of you think of the Super Bowl when I mention Minneapolis? They hosted one roughly twenty years ago and that's largely forgotten. Just as Indy will be in 2032 if we don't host another one. There are many reasons to continue to host one now and then. With the NFL rewarding most teams these days for building new stadiums and always wanting to have the New Orleans, Miami, Arizona, etc. locations I think about once every eight to tweleve years is realistic and would work well from an Indy civic standpoint.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT