Hosting another Super Bowl could deliver diminished return

February 6, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

There’s a part of me that thinks Indianapolis should NEVER host another Super Bowl.

I know, after the week we’ve had here in central Indiana, it sounds crazy.

I’m sure our image is going to get a major boost and I’m betting the tally for direct visitor spending is going to be very near a record $200 million for the week.

But something Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Association CEO Leonard Hoops told me last week has stuck with me.

He said a city never gets as big a brand boost as it does from its very first Super Bowl. Hoops said another thing that struck me: You don’t host a Super Bowl for the direct visitor spending alone. You do it largely for the marketing bounce and the follow-up convention and tourism business that it drives.

Right now, after a week of temperatures in the 40s and 50s, little rain and even less snow, and with 8,000 volunteers more full of cheer than a band of elves at Christmas, this city is riding an all-time high.

And if another Super Bowl comes to Indianapolis, I fear our bubble could burst.

The Indianapolis Super Bowl Host Committee said Monday morning that it could try to land another Super Bowl as soon as 2017. And positive responses from NFL officials about this year's event are leading them to believes it's a possibility.

It’s true the Indiana Sports Corp. and the engine that hosts these types of events are unrivaled nationally. Much bigger cities have tried and failed to mimic what Indianapolis has done. Chicago is the latest.

But let’s face it: Indianapolis never had to face its most feared foe this week. Mother Nature never reared her ugly head. She instead sent kindly temperatures and gentle breezes to make us all feel good about the week.

Yes, Indianapolis had a preparedness plan to deal with just about any weather catastrophe. But just because streets are plowed and sidewalks salted doesn’t mean zero-degree temperatures and sub-arctic wind blasts are going to make people love Indianapolis.

And it’s true that Indianapolis has more hotel rooms connected to one another, shopping, restaurants and the convention center by enclosed walkways than any city in America. But being forced into those gerbil tubes sure is enough to make a person think about Miami beaches and Arizona sunshine.

Bad weather has a way of making other bad things happen as well. And any marketer will tell you, one disaster can unravel a decade of positive brand building in a heartbeat.

“I think we burned a lifetime of good karma in a week, and the culmination of that was the game,” said Mark Miles, 2012 Super Bowl Host Committee Chairman.

Never have truer words been spoken.

Almost nothing went wrong. We actually were forced to complain about the little things like the Super Bowl Village being too crowded or a scarcity of zip-line tickets. Those are merely signs of the event’s overwhelming success.

There were a few hearty wind gusts early last week that caused some tents to close for a couple hours. Those memories have long been buried deep beneath an avalanche of pleasant happenings in the Circle City.

About the only thing to complain about on game day was shrimp cocktail that cost $30. And that was out of the local host committee's hands.

ISC Chairman Joe DeGroff recently told me successes don’t make you want to slow down and they don’t make expectations dwindle. They make you hungrier. And he added that the ISC’s victories only make people ask for more.

But I wonder, how much more can this city deliver?

I have no doubt that the NFL is going to ask for an encore performance. But not in 10 years, as has been previously suggested. I believe after the local host committee led by Miles and CEO Allison Melangton rocked this town and the entire NFL and its 32 owners, they’ll be asked to host America’s most popular sporting event within the next six years.

Indianapolis isn’t the only one that gets a giant brand boost when the Super Bowl goes off this flawlessly. A noted sports business expert told me after Sunday night’s game that the NFL might now need Indianapolis as much as Indianapolis needs the NFL. After all, there’s no shortage of bigger cities that have failed to do half the job of hosting the NFL’s crown jewel that Indianapolis has.

That is just what we’ve asked for, Indiana University Athletics Director Fred Glass reminded me last week.

“When we built this venue, we hoped to get one Super Bowl,” said Glass, who was instrumental in crafting the deal to build Lucas Oil Stadium and the bid that brought the Super Bowl to Indianapolis. “All we wanted was just one to show the world what we could do and cause people to want us, and invite us to be a regular host.”

Even before the game kicked off Sunday, Glass concluded, “That’s absolutely realistic.”

It seems more realistic than ever now.

But can Indy—and its sports-business-minded leaders—live up to hype?

As they say in sporting circles, that’s why they play the game.

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • I can understand your concern, but you never turn down a chance to host an event like a Superbowl. It will be interesting to see how NY/NJ does hosting a Superbowl, not only in a cold weather city, but in an open air stadium. After that, other northern open air stadiums will quickly be taken off the list. Couple that with the monsoon endured during the Colts win in Miami, the "freak" ice storms that have hit Atlanta and Dallas when they hosted and the crime, dirtiness and poverty of New Orleans, the quaintness of Indy and the all weather stadium designed for the biggest game will be welcomed.

    The NFL learned this week the pent up demand of the northerners who want to attend Superbowl festivities but can't afford to fly thousands of miles to the southern coast to attend. This showed that people can drive a few hours and have a blast on a relatively inexpensive budget.

    Most importantly, never underestimate Indy's ability to raise the bar and do it better every time. We wrote the book on Final Four hosting, and we did it again with the Superbowl.

    So we welcome the Superbowl and any other major event. We will do as we always do and step up and hit it out of the park.
  • Hot Sales Leads
    Following up with attracting key non profit organizations and their events focused upon our Life Science, Manufacturing, Logistics, Agriculture, & Sports industry would be a smart strategy.

    It should be a target rich environment.
  • Hard to Repeat
    I think the success of this Super Bowl in Indy will be hard to repeat for two big reasons. First, we have to admit that we lucked out on the weather. This helped bring the crowds downtown. We were able to handle the logistics of hosting the big crowds downtown in a confined space. I don't know what the plans were in case we got 6 to 8 inches of snow but that's always possible. I am not opposed to hosting the Super Bowl, I'm just trying to be realistic. The other big issue is that I believe a big part of the turnout for the Super Bowl events here was due to the fact that it was the first time. If we have another event too soon it will not have the same novelty as this one did. That said, one of the great things is that the Super Bowl Host Committee no doubt learned things that will make our next event even better. Hello my no
  • On to the next big thing.
    We dodged the winter bullet. No need to tempt fate again. We've established that we do big events better than anyone, now let's move on to big SUMMER events. A Republican national convention, and, dare I even write it, the Olympics.
  • Comments spot on
    I was offered 3 FREE tickets to the game Sunday (thanks, but would rather watch on TV). Tix to the game were going for face value - or less - according to on-site tix brokers (game day tix in Dallas last year were $4,000 apiece). According to that same broker, we were looking at predominantly "local" traffic for Super Bowl week (neither the Giants' or Patriots' fans traditionally travel well and with Super 8 hotel prices at $300/night, we didn't do ourselves any favors in trying to attract them). Bottom line, we spent a lot of money and effort to entertain ourselves and pat ourselves on the back (we spent more to just acquire the game than we do on the arts in a DECADE! And the arts generate $500 million in revenue per year - not what will amount to a net loss when all the numbers are crunched). Bottom line, it's going to take some serious number crunching and re-crunching and prettying up to make another Super Bowl even appear remotely worth it. I think there are better and more worthy things this town needs to be spending its time and money on...and that $200 million we supposedly made? More than 80% of it goes right back out the door to national chains and etc. while the rest of it was just money re-circulated within the community - to go with the nearly one billion it cost us just to get the game and put it on (counting the stadium build). I for one am glad to see it go. For good. Self-congratulation and self aggrandizement be darned!
  • No Politics Please
    ScottD

    Yes, we need new events year round that repeat themselves here regularly.

    Sorry to tell you, but the U.S. lost bids to host the Olympics and World Cup just recently.

    Additionally political conventions are losers with very little upside considering protestors/civil disorder etc...

    Just look at Seattle's WTO meeting or Chicago's Democratic convention.
  • Great event
    I was there. Indy pulled it off like no other. This was my fifth Super Bowl in person. By far, it was the best. EVERYTHING about it was superb. Pat yourself on the back, Circle City.
  • Idiot naysayer
    All of you, including the articel writer really need to watch the WFYI documentary "Naptown to Super City". Nothing is more disgusting than something good happens to our community and many people try to offer their negative spin. There is no negative spin here. This city has come a long way and now to host two of the biggest sporting events is quite an accomplishment. Bring it back again within 5 years. The other things to spend money on that has been offered is garbage. Those "arts" and other community funding will only be more opportunistic as a reult of being a Superbowl host town. Indy is now arguably the sport capital of the world. Embrace that and all the ancillary benefits that come from that! You people that have commented negatively are perpetual pessimists and need to really look at the perspective and from where this town has come in the past 20 years!
  • Moderation
    I'm not sure that Indy needs to be or will have the chance to host the Super Bowl every five or six years like the Final Four. However, I think there are definitely gains from hosting a Super Bowl every ten or so years. Let me ask you this. How many of you think of the Super Bowl when I mention Minneapolis? They hosted one roughly twenty years ago and that's largely forgotten. Just as Indy will be in 2032 if we don't host another one. There are many reasons to continue to host one now and then. With the NFL rewarding most teams these days for building new stadiums and always wanting to have the New Orleans, Miami, Arizona, etc. locations I think about once every eight to tweleve years is realistic and would work well from an Indy civic standpoint.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT