Butler basketball hits 40-plus-year attendance high

February 28, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In terms of wins and losses, this hasn’t been a banner year for the Butler men’s basketball team. At least it isn’t measuring up to the results of Brad Stevens’ last two teams.

Of course, there’s still time to turn this season into another shining moment for the Bulldogs program. Butler tips off Tuesday night in the opener of the Horizon League tournament by hosting Wright State.

In terms of attendance, though, the Bulldogs have already posted a victory. Butler has drawn more fans to Hinkle Fieldhouse this year than it has in nearly 50 years.

Butler attracted 115,232 fans to Hinkle for 16 regular season home games, averaging 7,202 through the turnstiles. The last time the Bulldogs are believed to have attracted that many fans was in 1964, when Butler averaged more than 8,000 per game. Butler attendance records from 1965 to 1969 are incomplete.

The team’s following has been on the upswing for several years. Last year, Butler men’s team averaged 7,178 per game, marking the first time the team drew more than 100,000 fans to Hinkle for the regular season in four decades. During the 2009-10 season average attendance was 6,852.

This year marks the sixth consecutive season Butler has led the Horizon League in regular-season attendance.

Not long ago, you could have fired a cannon in Hinkle Fieldhouse during a men’s game with little fear of hitting anyone. Consider, the Bulldogs drew an average of 5,516 fans per game during the 2008-09 season and just 3,593 during the 1995-96 season.

Butler this year sold out season tickets for the best seats in the house despite a per-game price tag of $91.67 for courtside and $30.50 for lower-level tickets plus a priority-points system that had many ticket buyers paying a few bucks more per game.

“Obviously, our success and runs in the NCAA tournament have helped,” said Mike Freeman, Butler associate athletic director. “Having more games on television both nationally—on the ESPN channels—and locally—on WNDY-TV—has brought about more exposure. Also, we have focused more effort on season ticket and group sales, with both increasing each of the last couple years.”

It would be easy to say Butler needs to keep Coach Brad Stevens to continue its growth. Already this year the rumors about Stevens have started. Illinois is reported to be the most recent team interested in hiring him. Of course the Bulldog faithful want Stevens to stay, and his salary has been amped up in recent years to assure hiring him away won't be easy. But Butler has shown it can grow and prosper despite coaching changes. And the continued commitment by university brass is encouraging.

James Danko, who became Butler’s president Aug. 1, wants to use the men’s basketball team as a key marketing tool. That’s a path Danko’s predecessor Bobby Fong took, as well.

“I’ve seen how leveraging athletics can lift the image of the entire university,” said Danko, former dean of Villanova University’s business school. “I absolutely see the athletic department, and the men’s basketball team in particular, as critical in doing that here.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

ADVERTISEMENT