Theismann calls LOS NFL's finest

August 15, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
lucfieldJoe Theismann has been inside every single National Football League stadium. The former quarterback and TV announcer said yesterday that the new Lucas Oil Stadium is a one-of-a-kind.

“I’m not saying it’s one of the best I’ve seen,” Theismann said yesterday before serving as the master of ceremonies at the stadium’s opening gala. “If that’s what I meant, that’s what I’d say. I’m saying it’s the best stadium I’ve seen. And I’m not just saying that because I’m here. The NFL has never seen anything quite like this.”

Theismann said he was impressed by the design, set-up and entertainment options at the $720 million retractable roof stadium. He added that the sight lines are "amazing," only matched by Ford Field in Detroit.

The stadium’s sponsor areas add a nice touch to the facility without making it over-commercialized, Theismann added. “This is a football facility built for a football team and football fans,” Theismann said. “It’s phenomenal.”
  • I know the stadium cost a lot of money, but if you're going to build one, you might as well build the best. Otherwise, we'd once again have to hear from the architectual snobs in this town who constantly whine that we settle for mediocrity.
  • You have no idea what a real architecture snob is, Brian.

    Travel to Chicago or London, among other global cities, to get a real taste of the passionate opinions architecture can produce.


    I'm glad Mr. Theismann likes the building.
  • I'll second Brian's sentiment... I would hope since it's the newest stadium in the country it would be the best. Otherwise the people in charge learned nothing from any mistakes other stadiums have made or have failed to take advantage of some of the geographic advantages the building site has.

    The real test, though, is if a few years down the road it still holds up as the best. The Fieldhouse is a great example of this. We're a decade or so into its existence and many people outside of us biased local folks still say it's the best arena in the NBA. THAT is success.
  • The Hoosier Dome is an example of why you spend more to build the very best you can. It was built on a shoestring budget that kept eliminating ammenities and revenue sources. It was built too small for baseball, the number of suites, bathrooms and concessions were reduced in half, escalators and ramps were removed from the design and halls and concourses were stripped to bare block and steel to save money. 20 years later it is very obsolete. If they had spent the money, it probably could have stayed relevant for another decade or more.
  • Oh, to answer Theisman, I think it is too early to say it is the best, let us break it in for a year then we can tell. But it certainly sets the bar very high.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.