Then & Now: The Dome

September 25, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
From architect Bob Hague: "I was a graduate architect just out of school responsible for building the study model, developing the construction documents and construction administration. Was involved in the project for 3 years. The rooftop tours are from 1983 and 25 years later 2008."

The Dome ThenThe
                              Dome Now
ADVERTISEMENT
  • That looks like fun! I wonder how many people had the privilege of walking around on the Dome's roof?
  • Awesome! Freaking Awesome!
  • nice. must have been fun
  • You gotta bring back that awesome 'stache, Bob.
  • Ablerock,
    last week there was a stream of Convention Center and construction team members walking up to take advantage of that last chance to jump on the dome.
    IT WAS COOL
  • Bob, thank you so much for submitting this, it's a very cool archive to see.

    Funny how in the first pic you are totally untethered, but in the second wearing a harness - increased liability requirements, or the cockiness of youth?!?

    Love it. Thank you.
  • What a great series of photos! The young, fearless Bob seems to jump much higher than the old, scared Bob. Haha!
  • Take note of safety requirements 1983 v 2008... Kinda funny for building people
  • Your correct Billy, the extra safety tie-offs and harness made it a lot more difficult to jump due to the extra weight. The Dome was classified as a construction site when we toured so we had to wear gear, hard hats and safety glasses. It had nothing to do with age. Ha! Preston I was not that scared surprisingly. It was a just as fun the second time.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT