Tighter Indiana scooter rules signed into law

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Drivers of motorized scooters in Indiana will face tighter regulations under a measure signed into law by Gov. Mike Pence.

The new law will require scooter operators to obtain license plates from the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, have valid state ID and pass a road sign test. The new rules take effect in January.

Some legislators and police agencies have pushed for years for additional scooter regulations, although the new law won't require that scooter drivers have insurance as many had sought.

Evansville police Sgt. Jason Cullum told the Evansville Courier & Press the changes will have a positive impact.

The law keeps the minimum age to operate scooters at 15, while raising their maximum speed to 35 mph and banning them from interstates.

Cullum said last month that his department has seen scooters used in drug-dealing and drive-by shootings. Scooter accidents rose to 90 in the city in 2012, up from fewer than 10 in 2008. Authorities also say the vehicles are growing popular with those who have suspended driver's licenses.

Scooter dealers estimate there about 50,000 scooters in use across the state.


  • Unconstitutional
    Under current, previous existing law, this new law would be unconstitutional. Not that supposedly having to have a driver's license to drive isn't in the first place.
  • Re: Rides for DUI-ers
    If I pull you over on a moped going 42 you'll wind up with at least 2 tickets. Your DUI-mobile will get towed and if your license is suspended you're going to jail.
    • avid scooter rider
      I drive a scooter, have a license, and car. Why do I choose to drive a scooter? Several reasons, 100 mpg, mitigate wear and tear on cars, makes economic sense (a quick run to the grocery store on a scooter saves gas, time, and wear on car), fun, accessibility, and its so much cheaper to maintain. i'm ok w the registration requirement but if our government asks for insurance and licenses then that will negate the reasons why i drive one in the first place.
    • smart rides
      It costs less to buy a brand new scooter than the typical deductible for a regular vehicle and they get 100 mpg, perfect for local driving.....way better than 12,14,17,24, or 32 mpg. Seems to be alot of judging.....personally don't ride one but hey....can't be a bad idea.
    • And Therefore?
      "Cullum said last month that his department has seen scooters used in drug-dealing and drive-by shootings." What does this even mean?
    • Show a little grace
      Those who drive scooters typically do it because they have to, not because it is enjoyable to ride in the rain, cold, or at night. Has society progressed to the point where we are now so arrogant that we would rather see someone become homeless than see them drive a scooter on a public roadway? Good on those who make the effort use a scooter for transportation rather than dropping out of the workforce to become just one more number in the growing millions out of work. Just because people make mistakes, does not mean they should be punished until they can no longer provide for themselves.
    • not just for DUI
      Considering the high cost of car ownership, the mopeds offer a cheap alternative for transportation. Limiting things such as passengers simply increases the cost of transportation for people. Reading the law, I'm still not certain though if this new law applies for electric scooters. I'll be converting ours if it does not.
    • Rides for DUI-ers
      I understand people make mistakes. Right or Wrong people choose to drive at times when they shouldn't. Especially in the colder weather seasons and at night, these scooters on main roads for persons with suspended licenses, aka DUI mobiles, are just flat out not safe. Fine for neighborhoods but to drive on a main road you should be required to have a valid driver's license. Requiring simply a state ID to me really doesn't cure much except for those drivers under legal driving age. Don't really see any benefit of this. Especially to not require insurance. If you are driving on the road, you'd better have insurance. Speed limit of 35, really? Police going to pull you over for going 42 mph and do what to someone who doesn't have a valid driver's license? Not enough teeth at all to this new legislation.
      • No Passengers?????
        I guess these idiots never actually looked at mopeds/scooters. They have pegs for a passenger on them. I guess we can just file them off or something.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

      2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

      3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

      4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

      5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.