Tighter Indiana scooter rules signed into law

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Drivers of motorized scooters in Indiana will face tighter regulations under a measure signed into law by Gov. Mike Pence.

The new law will require scooter operators to obtain license plates from the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, have valid state ID and pass a road sign test. The new rules take effect in January.

Some legislators and police agencies have pushed for years for additional scooter regulations, although the new law won't require that scooter drivers have insurance as many had sought.

Evansville police Sgt. Jason Cullum told the Evansville Courier & Press the changes will have a positive impact.

The law keeps the minimum age to operate scooters at 15, while raising their maximum speed to 35 mph and banning them from interstates.

Cullum said last month that his department has seen scooters used in drug-dealing and drive-by shootings. Scooter accidents rose to 90 in the city in 2012, up from fewer than 10 in 2008. Authorities also say the vehicles are growing popular with those who have suspended driver's licenses.

Scooter dealers estimate there about 50,000 scooters in use across the state.


  • avid scooter rider
    I drive a scooter, have a license, and car. Why do I choose to drive a scooter? Several reasons, 100 mpg, mitigate wear and tear on cars, makes economic sense (a quick run to the grocery store on a scooter saves gas, time, and wear on car), fun, accessibility, and its so much cheaper to maintain. i'm ok w the registration requirement but if our government asks for insurance and licenses then that will negate the reasons why i drive one in the first place.
  • smart rides
    It costs less to buy a brand new scooter than the typical deductible for a regular vehicle and they get 100 mpg, perfect for local driving.....way better than 12,14,17,24, or 32 mpg. Seems to be alot of judging.....personally don't ride one but hey....can't be a bad idea.
  • And Therefore?
    "Cullum said last month that his department has seen scooters used in drug-dealing and drive-by shootings." What does this even mean?
  • Show a little grace
    Those who drive scooters typically do it because they have to, not because it is enjoyable to ride in the rain, cold, or at night. Has society progressed to the point where we are now so arrogant that we would rather see someone become homeless than see them drive a scooter on a public roadway? Good on those who make the effort use a scooter for transportation rather than dropping out of the workforce to become just one more number in the growing millions out of work. Just because people make mistakes, does not mean they should be punished until they can no longer provide for themselves.
  • not just for DUI
    Considering the high cost of car ownership, the mopeds offer a cheap alternative for transportation. Limiting things such as passengers simply increases the cost of transportation for people. Reading the law, I'm still not certain though if this new law applies for electric scooters. I'll be converting ours if it does not.
  • Rides for DUI-ers
    I understand people make mistakes. Right or Wrong people choose to drive at times when they shouldn't. Especially in the colder weather seasons and at night, these scooters on main roads for persons with suspended licenses, aka DUI mobiles, are just flat out not safe. Fine for neighborhoods but to drive on a main road you should be required to have a valid driver's license. Requiring simply a state ID to me really doesn't cure much except for those drivers under legal driving age. Don't really see any benefit of this. Especially to not require insurance. If you are driving on the road, you'd better have insurance. Speed limit of 35, really? Police going to pull you over for going 42 mph and do what to someone who doesn't have a valid driver's license? Not enough teeth at all to this new legislation.
    • No Passengers?????
      I guess these idiots never actually looked at mopeds/scooters. They have pegs for a passenger on them. I guess we can just file them off or something.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

    2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

    3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

    4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

    5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?