Watson boosts Crooked Stick event

July 20, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
watsonTom Watson’s near British Open Victory yesterday has sent ticket sales skyward for the U.S. Senior Open hosted by Crooked Stick Golf Club in Carmel July 27-Aug. 2.

Watson will be one of the headliners of the local event, and organizers are planning a new round of advertising featuring the 59-year-old British Open runner-up.

“We’ve seen a huge spike in our Web site traffic, and we’re starting to get more phone inquiries,” said Max Novena, the event’s director.

In a great understatement, Novena said, "This is certainly a stroke of good luck." Novena and his staff started preperations for this event nearly three years ago thinking it could be one of the biggest, most profitable U.S. Senior Opens in history. Then the bottom fell out of the economy. Now, Watson has put the wind back in their sails (and sales).

Novena said his staff today is updating the event’s Web site to feature Watson more prominently, and will place a large ad in the Indianapolis Star tomorrow congratulating Watson, who lost the British Open in a four-hole playoff with Stewart Cink.

Watson, Hale Irwin and Greg Norman have been the at the center of marketing materials up to this point, Novena said, and now Watson will take a more prominent role. This week, Watson plays in the in the British Senior Open, and a good performance there could boost interest even more.

Novena thinks Watson’s recent success will bring golf fans from around Indiana and beyond to Carmel next week.

“What Tom Watson did at the British Open is remarkable, and shows he really does still have game,” Novena said. “He plays a very limited schedule, maybe 10 events a year, and he’s in our field. So we think this has the potential to be a very special event here.”

Attendance is already projected to be 150,000 for the three days of practice and four-day tournament. With Watson’s success at the British Open, sports marketers think that could increase by at least 15 percent.
  • Go, Tom, Go! This should be a big economic impact for Indy.
  • I've got my tickets. Should be a great show. Lots of people around here take these events for granted. I have two friends coming in from 200 miles away to see this.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.