Too much contact?

May 13, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Arts organizations are tweeting. Arts organizations are facebooking. Arts organizations are inviting you to post reviews on their sites. Arts organizations are asking you to participate in surveys. Arts organizations seem to be trying every way to reach out to you.

But when is the line crossed from informative into annoyance? When does all the ancillary info --  the marketing messages, the rehearsal footage, the backstage photos, the author interviews -- get in the way of the experience itself?

From the blogroll, Chad Bauman of Arena Stage chimes in on the subject here. I'd like to hear your thoughts.

As an arts journalist, I have ongoing communications with Indy's artistic folks, so my perspective is different on this. So I'm asking you: Do you find yourself missing events because you didn't know about them? How are Indy arts organizations doing at reaching out and connecting to you?

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I think as arts organizations continue to lose funding from public sources, they have to be more inventive in their marketing and membership efforts. Keeping up with the joneses with electronic and social media connections allows them to tap into their audience for little to no cost. It's choosing what's important to your audience that's the tricky part.
  • They can't bother you if you don't want to be connected. You don't have to
    be their Facebook friends, you don't have to follow them on Twitter. In a way
    it's actually less invasive than billboard or television ads, because at the end
    of the day, you're the gatekeeper.
  • If by arts, you include the general category of nonprofits, I wish they'd cut back on (or cut out) the four-color mags that no one reads and do more e-notifications on a more timely basis. I'm a member of various organizations that I know are struggling to pay staff and programming costs, but here comes my glossy, expensive, unread magazine, right on schedule.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT