Tower's new look taking shape

August 23, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
One Indiana SquareThe first of the new glass panels are up on One Indiana Square. What do you think so far? The transformation of the 36-story tower built in 1970 is expected to take about two years, so everyone will have plenty of time to decide if they like it.

The project likely will cost between $25 million and $30 million. The building was damaged last year by high winds and hail.

For an earlier post that includes a rendering, check here.

  • To me that facade actually looks really good. Much better than the renderings showed. This will really modernize the skyline imo, along with MSA Kosene and Pennn Centre.
  • I'm just glad to see them getting this thing going...It looks so tacky they way it is now.
  • I just hope that in the end they decide to modernize the base as well as the tower.
  • Worth it. Makes the skyline look much better and increases the value of that tower in the eyes of potential tenents.
  • I'm pretty sure this new facade is going to be amazing. Agreed, Josh, much better than the rendering. The rendering looked almost green and it looks decidedly blue in person (I highly recommend going to see it).
  • I really like it and as mentioned, this will do wonders for our skyline.

    Let's get the JW, Penn Centre, and MSA sites U/C NOW!!!!
  • A fresh look on our city will make it look cleaner. Either that or a nice cool, sleek feel to it.
  • Duuuuuck!
  • Yep CorrND although I do wish the cream colored lines were removed and it was just a solid blue. Now that would look slick as hell!!
  • How much influence does the city government have towards the style and look of major buildings?
  • Hey Cory! Any word on that proposed condo development on Indiana Ave. north of the Captiol? Ya know, the one that includes the proposed drive-thru bank too... Meh :-
  • JT- City government (DMD) has some influence in the Regional Center area currently, as such projects require regional center approval. In practice, this is sensitive to political adjustments.
  • looks good
  • I liked the original renderings, and I like it even better in person. It will add a distinct new look to our skyline. Good job.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. This is still my favorite Mexican restaurant in town. What I do love about the new version is it is much quieter than the most recent version. TV's were off, the music wasn't too loud, and the wait staff were not hyperactive like they had been the past few times I had been there. I just wish they would bring back the MOLE for the enchiladas!

  2. Not a bad paper. There is a need for local community news and city government issues. Don't really need the owner's constant national political rants. We all know where they stand by now.

  3. What nice people. Menard should've known better than to team up with the guy who robbed and drove Conseco to ashes. I'm surprised Timothy Durham isn't involved in this.

  4. Hello, I am Maris Peters, currently living in Texas city, USA. I am a widow at the moment with three kids and i was stuck in a financial situation in August 2014 and i needed to refinance and pay my bills. I tried seeking loans from various loan Companies both private and corporate but never with success, and most banks declined my credit. But as God would have it, I was introduced to a Man of God a private loan lender who gave me a loan of $65,000USD and today am a business owner and my kids are doing well at the moment, if you must contact any firm or company with reference to securing a loan without collateral , no credit check, no co signer with just 2% interest rate and better repayment plans and schedule, please contact Mr William David. He doesn’t know that am doing this but am so happy now and i decided to let people know more about him and also i want God to bless him more.You can contact him through his email:

  5. It is beyond me how anyone can think this was a "bad deal" for the state! If they could take the money back then, yes, but they can't! Protections were built in the agreement. Now, if they roll the roads up and take them away, I will agree that it was a bad deal. Otherwise, the only way to have paid for the infrastructure that was badly needed was for the state to issue bonds....that is a four letter synonym for debt folks!!