Town Manager Fadness wins mayoral primary in Fishers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Scott Fadness won Fishers’ first mayoral primary Tuesday, edging out five Republican candidates—including longtime former Town Council President Walt Kelly—seeking to lead the fast-growing town as it becomes a city.

Fadness and Kelly led the field, garnering more than 88 percent of the 9,100-plus votes cast. The final tally: 4,274 for Fadness, 3,881 for Kelly and 488 for current Town Council member Renee Cox. The other three candidates collected a total of 548 votes.

No Democrats were on the ballot, but the party still could nominate a candidate before the November general election. Even so, Fadness remains the presumptive favorite given the area’s overwhelmingly Republican population.

Hamilton County voter turnout Tuesday was an anemic 12 percent countywide, with fewer than 25,000 ballots cast despite the historic mayor's race in Fishers.

Fadness, 32, has been Fishers’ appointed town manager since 2011. In that role, he oversees day-to-day operations and has steered efforts to build a vibrant downtown that draws businesses and residents alike.

“I’m excited to get to work moving Fishers forward,” he said Tuesday night after greeting supporters at his campaign headquarters. “This is a monumental night.”

Kelly was critical of the town’s investment in downtown redevelopment, saying officials should focus instead on parks, trails and other neighborhood amenities that are important to bedroom communities like Fishers. He led the council for 17 years, resigning in 2001 to become managing partner of a large accounting firm.

Voters clearly wanted more. In 2012, residents approved a ballot measure turning the town of 80,000 into a second-class city with an elected mayor. The change takes effect Jan. 1.

The Fishers Town Council also is growing as a result of the transition. The council is gaining just two seats for a total of nine (six districts and three at-large), but at least five new members will join its ranks.

Incumbent councilor Mike Colby lost to GOP challenger Selena Stoller by a dozen votes in Fishers’ northwest district; she’ll face Democrat Kent Nelson in November.

Eric Moeller won the nomination for Cox’s north-central district seat. He is unopposed in the general election.

Republican candidates Todd Zimmerman, Cecilia Coble and Rich Block received the most votes for the three at-large seats. No Democrats are running.

In other council races:

— Incumbent David George outlasted challenger Bill Brown, receiving about 55 percent of the votes cast in the southwest district. He faces Democrat Justin Kilgore in November.

— Longtime Councilor Stuart Easley eked out a 25-vote victory over former Greenfield Mayor Brad DeReamer in the northeast district race, which drew four GOP candidates. He doesn’t have a Democratic opponent.

— Council President John Weingardt didn’t have a primary opponent in his south-central district, but he will face Democrat Greg Purvis in the general election.

— Vice President Pete Peterson is unopposed in his southwest district—also home to longtime council leader Scott Faultless, who did not run for re-election.


  • Art
    I believe that's because most people really did not want Fishers to be a city. I believe the ballot in the previous election confused people. The wording was confusing. I believe many people cast a vote for "option 1" thinking they were voting against becoming a city when in fact it meant they wanted to be one with an elected Mayor. The results in this election suggest, to me, that this is what happened.
  • Turnout
    I personally refuse to vote in a primary where I have to declare my party allegiance. While I generally tend to side with the Republican Party I do not consider myself a stalwart Republican. I am an Independent the votes with the candidate that best represents my views. As such, I don't feel like I've participated in a meaningful manner during the 11 years I've lived in Fishers. It is a shame that the two-party system has failed in Fishers.
  • Apathy
    I find it incredible that so many shouted "We are tired of being run by a town manager that we do not vote for -- we demand to be a city and to elect our own mayor!!!" And a pitiful 12% showed up to cast their vote for exactly what they demanded. A very sad commentary from an apathetic population.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

    2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

    3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

    4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

    5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).