
We're
sorry, but we cannot find the page you requested. Our Advanced Search page can assist in helping you find the article or content you are attempting
to locate.
Thank You!

We're
sorry, but we cannot find the page you requested. Our Advanced Search page can assist in helping you find the article or content you are attempting
to locate.
Thank You!
IBJ hasn't written an article in over 10 days. How that for the gratest race in the universe? Not even a zip-line article. And the article before that was about Sato and Hinchcliffffee being the stories of the 6 days. And, how the speedway should pimp those guys to show how it can market drivers. Zip, ziltch, zero coverage on the 500 by IBJ. Why waste pixels and electrons I suspect is IBJ's theory...why waste them on the 500? No Tv coverage of qualifying, no bumping, nothing to cover I guess. Oh, not even SPECIAL ED coverage. You see, that's why Zak Brown turned this job down. Because indy, the IRL and now Indycar are epic failures. Pole day had about 15K in attendance, bump Day about 5K and if they had 1K all week it would be a miracle. But, taxpayers will be paying more for tix and parking next year...all so the IMS can blow $100M on amenities no one cares about. Zak....keep on running fella away from this mess.
Here's the bigger question: Why should anyone be allowed to dictate the religious beliefs of another person or group? We have freedom OF religious expression in this country; not freedom from religion. You don't like what the prof is teaching? Fine. Don't take his class. But leave me my freedom to take the class if I want to.
Chuck, To buy into evolution, you must accept the premise that up until a particular day, there was no life; and then after that day there was life. This is known as spontaneous generation, and it was proved false centuries ago. Evolution is a theory that can be used to explain some observations. Evolution cannot be tested. What evolutionists call "preponderance of evidence" is, in fact, a large number of observations. Evidence comes from experimental testing, something to which evolution is not subject. What evolution cannot explain is DNA, RNA, and, more importantly, gender; especially in light of what we know about how DNA and RNA function. The Theory of Intelligent Design - not "creationism" - does explain those things. It is also not subject to testing. Something for you to consider: If there is no creator, why is there anything at all?
More information on the IndyLandBank Reggie Walton Scandal here: http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html
Hey ddem, Wow, you really know how to pigeon hole a guy. You claim I'm a liberal with answers (sure don't) who's really not open-minded, thinks you're sad and silly (I don't but I do think creationism is when taught as a college science course) and who somehow shares the same environmental politics as Al Gore?! Mea maxima culpa. Consider me properly chastised by your scintillating post. And thanks for showing why any level of philosophical discussion with a self righteous mind set such as yours would be a futile waste of time for a wretched liberal such as me.