IBJNews

Trucking firms brace for impact of new driver-rest rules

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 New U.S. safety regulations requiring truckers to work shorter shifts may cut productivity, worsen a driver shortage and boost freight costs for the $8.4 trillion in goods hauled each year by American big rigs.

That is to be balanced by a decline in deaths and injuries from crashes and savings in health-care costs as the regulations improve driver safety, according to federal regulators.

The rules that took effect this month may reduce productivity by about 3 percent, translating into $18 billion in additional costs for an industry with annual revenue of around $600 billion, according to Bloomington-based freight data and forecasting firm FTR Associates. Training and transition expenses may add another $320 million to truck companies’ annual tabs, according to an estimate by the Department of Transportation.

“That cost of transportation has to be passed on,” said Charles W. Clowdis, a Nashville-based director of transportation advisory services at IHS Global Insight. “If I run a company, it means I’ll have to have more drivers doing the same thing, which means I’ll have to raise my rates, and that’ll raise the cost of the goods I’m transporting to the consumer.”

Companies such as Indianapolis-based Celadon Group Inc., YRC Worldwide Inc. and Werner Enterprises Inc. will be scouring an already tight labor market in trucking for additional help as the rules reduce the maximum number of weekly hours drivers can spend on the road to 70 from 82.

The rules also mandate a 34-hour rest period each week that would require the nation’s 1.6 million long-haul drivers to be off two consecutive nights. And the regulations mandate a 30- minute break after eight hours on the road.

Celadon announced earlier this year that it plans to build a $5.7 million driver training facility in Indianapolis to help with driver recruitment.

Accident projections

About 1,400 crashes, 560 injuries and 19 deaths each year will be prevented, said Marissa Padilla, a spokesman for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. The regulation will bring about annual savings of about $470 million from improved driver health and $280 million as a result of fewer highway accidents, the Department of Transportation said July 1.

Truck-related fatalities rose 2 percent, to 3,757, in 2011 and injuries increased 10 percent, to 88,000, according to data compiled by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Those levels were below the annual average 4,296 of deaths and 74,800 injuries over the decade ended in 2011. Fatigue was a factor in about 13 percent of serious crashes involving large trucks, according to a July 2007 study by NHTSA and FMCSA.

Joan Claybrook, consumer co-chairman of the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety in Washington, D.C., and a former NHTSA administrator, said the regulations don’t go far enough and that truckers should be limited to 10 consecutive hours behind the wheel and a continuous 48-hour rest period per week.

‘Five cents’

“I don’t know any consumer who wouldn’t rather pay an extra five cents for a can of beans in order not to have a driver fall asleep,” Claybrook said.

The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which negotiates time behind the wheel and mileage rates, said the 34-hour weekly rest period is too brief for the 600,000 people it represents in the industry.

“There’s concern that we’re sharing the road with drivers who are not as well-rested or as alert as they should be,” Fred McLuckie, director of federal legislation and regulation for the Teamsters in Washington, said. “What price do you put on safety?”

Trucking accounts for the biggest share of freight transportation in the world’s largest economy in terms of value and tonnage, according to a 2009 Transportation Department report, the latest available. Trucks moved about 71 percent of the total value transported. In terms of volume, they hauled 9 billion tons, a 69-percent share.

‘Extremely efficient’

“Our economic system has been blessed by an extremely reliable, extremely efficient truck system,” said Larry Gross, a senior consultant at FTR in Bloomington. “People will end up paying more for trucks.”

Some Federal Reserve districts have highlighted the effect on labor from the regulation. Businesses in the Federal Reserve Banks of Richmond and Cleveland districts said the regulations may make it harder to find truck drivers, the Fed said June 5 in its Beige Book business survey. The Cleveland Fed noted that the rule’s impact on operations, productivity and pricing is the “biggest concern facing trucking companies at this time.”

“The industry will lose some degree of operating flexibility,” Steve Williams, former American Trucking Associations chairman and CEO of Maverick USA Inc., a trucking company based in Little Rock, Ark., said June 18 in testimony to the House Transportation Committee.

Labor market

Adding more drivers to payrolls will be a difficult undertaking. The industry was 158,000 drivers short of what it needed to meet demand in the second quarter, according to FTR.

The shortfall probably will widen by the end of this year to 251,000 truckers, the biggest deficit in nine years, and reach a record 338,000 by the end of 2015, according to FTR’s Driver Shortage Surplus gauge. The economic expansion and higher turnover help explain the industry’s labor shortage.

“Every cost gets passed down,” said Sean McNally, a spokesman for the ATA, an Arlington, Va.-based industry group. “As the labor market tightens and as demand for drivers goes up, typically wages go up as well. The competition is already fierce for good drivers. This is only going to increase that competition.’

United Parcel Service Inc. will face higher costs on long- haul routes as it will require new drivers to comply with the requirements, according to Tom Jensen, the Washington-based vice president for transportation policy for the world’s largest package-delivery company.

Routing changes

“We’re going to have to change some routing, change the network, which is going to change some drivers and handoff points,” Jensen said. “Costs would occur where we now have to have three drivers move freight across the country instead of two because we’re shortening shifts. We’re going to have to add some drivers to long haul runs.”

Derek Leathers, president and chief operating officer at Werner Enterprises in Omaha, Neb., said “these are the kinds of costs that will inevitably be passed on to the consumer. They’re going to have to be.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Re:DOT Enforcement
    You can't "pad" e-logs, which most companies are going to. Paper logs are going away for ever sooner than later.
  • DOT Enforcement
    How are these new rules going to get enforced. When was the last time you saw a State line truck check station open after the sun went down ? Answer is never. Pad the log sheet and you are home free.
    • Reply to Rick
      In response to Rick's comments, several companies are working on the technology you mentioned, but they don't have the bugs worked out yet. Google "Volvo failed crash test" to see a test that Volvo hyped up of their accident avoidance system, only to have the car crash into the truck in front of all the press. No other car-maker has perfected it yet either, though so of the cruise control systems on luxury cars slow the cars down as they sense an object ahead.
    • Technology
      Rick: The technology is already in use, just watch some luxury car commercials. However, it is expensive, is not designed to be retrofit on the millions of existing cars and trucks without it, and brings some of its own safety issues. Furthermore, it does not prevent a sleepy driver from going off road or accross the median. To do that, you need to spend multi-billions in upfront and maintenance costs to convert the highways for its use.
    • Why not try technology too?
      While these rules seem to make sense why is it when we can detect radar, have satellites that give us directions yet NO ONE has developed a simple system to judge distance from objects/vehicles and compare closing rate to prevent accidents. It seems simple. Calculate the speed of the vehicle, the distance between it and the object in front and calculate the correct distance and govern the speed to maintain a safe distance based on traffic and road conditions. This just doesn't seem like rocket science.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

      2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

      3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

      4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

      5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

      ADVERTISEMENT