IBJNews

Two of three Pyramids buildings to open following main break

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A water-main break at The Pyramids office complex on the city’s northwest side could keep one of the three buildings closed through Friday.

All three buildings were closed Thursday after the break left water standing in the basement. Water also seeped into the elevators.

Two of the buildings were scheduled to reopen at noon Friday. It was unclear whether the other building would open before the end of the day, said Cheri Shepherd of Cassidy Turley, which manages and leases the complex.

Estimates to repair the damage were unavailable, Shepherd said.

"At this time, we’re just focused on getting things back up and running,” she said.

The Pyramids are owned by New York-based Sterling American Property Inc. At 361,261 square feet, it’s the 25th-largest office complex in the city, according to IBJ statistics.

Water issues have caused numerous problems for businesses around the city in the wake of this week's winter storm.

The Indianapolis Fire Department said 32 commercial buildings in the city have experienced frozen or failed sprinkler systems. In addition, four school buildings in the Indianapolis Public Schools system suffered sprinkler-system failures, IFD said.

IPS is just one of dozens of school systems in the metropolitan area that canceled classes for the entire week due to a combination of heavy snowfall and below-zero temperatures.

State law requires building owners to notify IFD if their sprinkler systems fail and they intend to keep their buildings occupied.

Citizens Energy Group said it has repaired 50 water-main breaks this week and is working on five more. In addition, since Sunday, Citizens has fielded 20 calls about potential leaks and is investigating those calls.

Despite the recent frigid temperatures, a Citizens spokeswoman said the number of water breaks is only slightly above average for this time of year.

The water-main break at the Pyramids was on private property and not one that Citizens had to repair.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT