IBJNews

UPDATE: Bill to limit Indiana environmental rules dies

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After spending two decades pushing to make sure Indiana's environmental standards aren't stricter than the national ones, state Rep. David Wolkins said he didn't consider it a setback Monday when a Senate committee denied the bill once again.

Just talking about the bill represented progress, Wolkins said.

"I'm not disappointed at all," said Wolkins, a Republican from Winona Lake. "That was all I intended to get out of it at this point. We will have the discussion again."

The Senate Environmental Affairs Committee held a rare discussion on the proposal Monday, but Chairman Ed Charbonneau, R-Valparaiso, declined to present the bill for a vote during the panel's last meeting of the legislative session. The House had approved the measure 68-28 on Jan. 28.

"We appreciate the chairman's wisdom," Hoosier Environmental Council Executive Director Jesse Kharbanda said of Charbonneau's action.

The bill would have blocked the Environmental Rules Board from creating standards stricter than current federal regulations, which Wolkins said would prevent excessive and expensive regulations for industries. Lawmakers still would have the power to go further than federal rules, Wolkins said.

Businesses and agricultural lobbyists were among those who spoke in favor of the bill during nearly two hours of testimony.

"If it's the position of the state that we should have more stringent standards, we should not be relying on the federal law itself," said Justin Schneider, senior policy adviser and counsel for the Indiana Farm Bureau. "The General Assembly should authorize that."

Critics say the measure would have tied regulators' hands and stopped the state from tailoring Indiana-specific environmental policies.

Former Republican state Sen. Beverly Gard, who chaired the Environmental Affairs Committee until her retirement in 2012, previously refused to hold a hearing for the bill. Gard now heads the Environmental Rules Board. She has called the bill "bad public policy."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • It is ironic.
    You're right, it is ironic that the Indiana governor doesn't want the Feds to tell us how to provide health insurance to our poorest citizens, but his party's legislature will try to introduce a bill that allows the Feds to tell us how bad the air we breathe is and what toxins are dumped in our water supply. One of Indiana's problems is that no one in power strives to be better than. Our new motto should have been "Indiana-we don't believe in change."
  • Ironic
    That diehard state's-rights conservatives would want to turn over rule making authority to the Feds.
  • Ed Charbonneau
    Thank you Ed Charbonneau for standing up for the health of your Hoosier constituents.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT