IBJNews

UPDATE: Bill to limit Indiana environmental rules dies

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After spending two decades pushing to make sure Indiana's environmental standards aren't stricter than the national ones, state Rep. David Wolkins said he didn't consider it a setback Monday when a Senate committee denied the bill once again.

Just talking about the bill represented progress, Wolkins said.

"I'm not disappointed at all," said Wolkins, a Republican from Winona Lake. "That was all I intended to get out of it at this point. We will have the discussion again."

The Senate Environmental Affairs Committee held a rare discussion on the proposal Monday, but Chairman Ed Charbonneau, R-Valparaiso, declined to present the bill for a vote during the panel's last meeting of the legislative session. The House had approved the measure 68-28 on Jan. 28.

"We appreciate the chairman's wisdom," Hoosier Environmental Council Executive Director Jesse Kharbanda said of Charbonneau's action.

The bill would have blocked the Environmental Rules Board from creating standards stricter than current federal regulations, which Wolkins said would prevent excessive and expensive regulations for industries. Lawmakers still would have the power to go further than federal rules, Wolkins said.

Businesses and agricultural lobbyists were among those who spoke in favor of the bill during nearly two hours of testimony.

"If it's the position of the state that we should have more stringent standards, we should not be relying on the federal law itself," said Justin Schneider, senior policy adviser and counsel for the Indiana Farm Bureau. "The General Assembly should authorize that."

Critics say the measure would have tied regulators' hands and stopped the state from tailoring Indiana-specific environmental policies.

Former Republican state Sen. Beverly Gard, who chaired the Environmental Affairs Committee until her retirement in 2012, previously refused to hold a hearing for the bill. Gard now heads the Environmental Rules Board. She has called the bill "bad public policy."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • It is ironic.
    You're right, it is ironic that the Indiana governor doesn't want the Feds to tell us how to provide health insurance to our poorest citizens, but his party's legislature will try to introduce a bill that allows the Feds to tell us how bad the air we breathe is and what toxins are dumped in our water supply. One of Indiana's problems is that no one in power strives to be better than. Our new motto should have been "Indiana-we don't believe in change."
  • Ironic
    That diehard state's-rights conservatives would want to turn over rule making authority to the Feds.
  • Ed Charbonneau
    Thank you Ed Charbonneau for standing up for the health of your Hoosier constituents.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT