Utility of WARN notices

December 11, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In times like these, what do you think of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, commonly called the WARN Act or WARN notices?

The federal law was passed in 1988 to give employees 60 days’ notice of an impending layoff, and now it’s getting a workout as companies unload busloads of people.

Broadly speaking, the law applies to companies with at least 100 employees that plan to lay off at least 50 employees at a particular site. Both hourly and salaried workers are covered.

Is the law burdensome to employers? Should employers be required to give even longer notices?

  • Yes it is burdensome as the speed of business is different today. There is some feeling out there that companies like layoffs. That is not true. Companies are run by people who understand having bills to pay and mouths to feed. But those same people also understand 1) no cash in the company checking account and 2) damage frequently caused by workers on the way out (recall Marion). It's a good idea, but it cannot always be implemented. The Chicago Republic factory is the perfect example. The bank shut off cash. Banks do that, and the do it with little warning. It's illegal to print money so what did the employees expect? When there is no cash, the is no cash.

    Broader scaled, 60 days is a long time in many companies which have a selling to delivery cycle of less than 60 days. If that cycle is shorter than 60 days, you don't have complete control of need for labor because you don't know demand. It has nothing to do with bad management, it has to do with trickle down impact from customers.

    Unfortunately, as we move toward socialism, we will get more of this burdensome stuff thrown at business. All the more reason to look at never hiring people as regular employees.
  • No one likes to fire people, but it is just good business to make the transition as painless as possible.

    While giving 60 days notice is not always possible, the Indiana Department of Workforce Development has discretion to waive this period when 60 days worth of severance compensation is offered in exchange for advanced notice.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.