IBJNews

Van Rooy scoops up troubled complex

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Van Rooy Properties plans to spend $5.5 million renovating a 277-unit west side apartment complex that it acquired a month ago in an unusual deal.

The local apartment owner and manager bought the former Lakeside at the Brickyard complex near 21st Street and High School Road by purchasing its bank note and then foreclosing on the owner, Chicago-based Northern Realty.

Russ Seiler, vice president of finance and development for Van Rooy, said it’s the first time the company has taken that path to ownership. Seiler wouldn’t identify the lender or the size of the loan, but he said Van Rooy took over the note by paying about a third of the outstanding debt obligation.

The combined cost of buying the bank note and rehabbing the property will come in at about a third of the replacement cost of the complex, which contains a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments.

The overall cost to Van Rooy of acquiring and refurbishing the property is low in spite of the extensive nature of the rehab. Van Rooy intends to spend about $20,000 a unit on the interior and exterior makeover. A typical apartment rehab is in the $5,000-to-$7,000 range, said George Tikijian, whose company Tikijian & Associates specializes in the sale of multi-family properties.

The deal Van Rooy got wasn’t the only selling point. Seiler said the proximity of the property to the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, planned improvements to Speedway’s Main Street and an abundance of retail on Crawfordsville Road also made the complex attractive.

Monthly rents will increase from the current range of $450 to $750 to between $500 and $850 when new tenants begin moving in next summer. Seiler said the increase will keep the property competitive with five or six other nearby properties that range in age from seven to 30 years old. Van Rooy’s property, which will be renamed Eagle Lake Landing, was built in 1976, but the money the company is pouring into it will justify the higher rents, Seiler said.

Seiler said buyers who want to acquire properties by purchasing outstanding bank notes need to consider their appetite for what could go wrong in such a deal. It took Van Rooy about six months to foreclose after buying the note, but it could easily have taken 18 months, he said. “You have to figure out if you’re comfortable with that risk.” And banks, Seiler said, are not as willing as people might think to unload loans gone bad. “It’s not as clean and simple as everybody might think.”

Seiler’s priority now is lining up a HUD-approved loan, insured by the Federal Housing Authority, to finance the rehab. It’s a lengthy process because HUD is flooded with applications from companies shut out by private lenders.

“The multi-family sector is very fortunate to have government-sponsored entities, such as FHA, still in the game. Other sectors don’t have that,” Seiler said.

Mike Petrie, a partner with locally based PR Mortgage, the firm arranging financing for Van Rooy, said companies that want to finance purchases and major rehabs have nowhere else to turn but the FHA, whose historical role is to step in when there is a lack of liquidity in the market.

But its role today is unprecedented, Petrie said. “We’ve been in business 30 years. This is the first time the FHA has been the preferred lender.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT