IBJNews

Van Rooy scoops up troubled complex

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Van Rooy Properties plans to spend $5.5 million renovating a 277-unit west side apartment complex that it acquired a month ago in an unusual deal.

The local apartment owner and manager bought the former Lakeside at the Brickyard complex near 21st Street and High School Road by purchasing its bank note and then foreclosing on the owner, Chicago-based Northern Realty.

Russ Seiler, vice president of finance and development for Van Rooy, said it’s the first time the company has taken that path to ownership. Seiler wouldn’t identify the lender or the size of the loan, but he said Van Rooy took over the note by paying about a third of the outstanding debt obligation.

The combined cost of buying the bank note and rehabbing the property will come in at about a third of the replacement cost of the complex, which contains a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments.

The overall cost to Van Rooy of acquiring and refurbishing the property is low in spite of the extensive nature of the rehab. Van Rooy intends to spend about $20,000 a unit on the interior and exterior makeover. A typical apartment rehab is in the $5,000-to-$7,000 range, said George Tikijian, whose company Tikijian & Associates specializes in the sale of multi-family properties.

The deal Van Rooy got wasn’t the only selling point. Seiler said the proximity of the property to the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, planned improvements to Speedway’s Main Street and an abundance of retail on Crawfordsville Road also made the complex attractive.

Monthly rents will increase from the current range of $450 to $750 to between $500 and $850 when new tenants begin moving in next summer. Seiler said the increase will keep the property competitive with five or six other nearby properties that range in age from seven to 30 years old. Van Rooy’s property, which will be renamed Eagle Lake Landing, was built in 1976, but the money the company is pouring into it will justify the higher rents, Seiler said.

Seiler said buyers who want to acquire properties by purchasing outstanding bank notes need to consider their appetite for what could go wrong in such a deal. It took Van Rooy about six months to foreclose after buying the note, but it could easily have taken 18 months, he said. “You have to figure out if you’re comfortable with that risk.” And banks, Seiler said, are not as willing as people might think to unload loans gone bad. “It’s not as clean and simple as everybody might think.”

Seiler’s priority now is lining up a HUD-approved loan, insured by the Federal Housing Authority, to finance the rehab. It’s a lengthy process because HUD is flooded with applications from companies shut out by private lenders.

“The multi-family sector is very fortunate to have government-sponsored entities, such as FHA, still in the game. Other sectors don’t have that,” Seiler said.

Mike Petrie, a partner with locally based PR Mortgage, the firm arranging financing for Van Rooy, said companies that want to finance purchases and major rehabs have nowhere else to turn but the FHA, whose historical role is to step in when there is a lack of liquidity in the market.

But its role today is unprecedented, Petrie said. “We’ve been in business 30 years. This is the first time the FHA has been the preferred lender.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT