Velodrome future in limbo

May 11, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
velodromeWhile the Marian College cycling team has been off hunting national championships in Colorado, school officials’ plan to manage the Major Taylor Velodrome has not yet won support from Indy Parks.

Marian College officials late last year forwarded a plan to manage the facility, which included upgrading the locker rooms, concession areas and other infrastructure, marketing the facility regionally and nationally to bring some of the biggest track cycling events to the facility, starting a week-day circuit race—or criterium—series on the streets and paved trails around the Velodrome and using the city’s trail network to the Velodrome to make it more of a destination for commuters, cycling aficionados and outdoor enthusiasts.

Marian’s plan also included enhancing off-road riding infrastructure for BMX, mountain and cyclecross bikes, as well as a two-mile perimeter loop for walking, running and leisure riding. Combined with trails in the Marian College EcoLab, an outdoor nature preserve of sorts, the new loop would make available a walking/hiking trail of almost five miles. Enhancing activities at the adjacent skate board park and Rugby field also are part of the plan.

It seemed like the perfect partnership for the school, which is about a half-mile from the Velodrome, and Indy Parks. A memorandum of agreement was drafted earlier this year, but the deal was never finalized.

“Marian continues to be a potential partner,” said Paula Freund, Indy Parks spokeswoman.

But Freund added that “several” organizations are interested in partnering with the city and making a “significant investment to the Velodrome.” She emphasized that any plan will have to consider the larger Lake Sullivan Sports Complex.

Indy Parks officials are issuing a request for information to gather a “broad spectrum of ideas and input” on the larger complex and a request for proposal for companies and other organizations interested in operating the Velodrome.

Marian officials in December told IBJ they hoped to launch enhanced programming at the Velodrome this spring and summer. Those plans are now on hold. Freund said the 27-year-old Velodrome facility needs “$750,000 just to bring it up to standard.” The track itself, she said, is in good shape. Indy Parks officials have now set a fall deadline to have the future of the Lake Sullivan Sports Complex mapped out, she added.

“We’re excited about the potential for partnering and gathering new ideas,” Freund said. “Public access to these facilities will be a key concern going forward.”
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Why the hell won't Indy Paks accept Marian's offer? It seems like an offer they can't refuse! Here's hoping Indy Parks finds some common sense for this practical choice.
  • 1. Hidebound bureaucracy.
    2. Not Invented Here.
    3. Loss of control by Parks staff.

    Including the whole Lake Sullivan sports complex really means the above.

    Get the picture?
  • I think Indy Parks should strongly consider Marian's offer. The Marian solution helps to preserve an important amenity in our community while boosting the image and profile of an important Indianapolis educational institution.
  • We can look at NASA to see what the Gov't can accomplish sans political meddling. Then we can see the other side. This reluctance by the ne'er do wells at INDY Parks shows the ugly side of political involvement amd gov'mint at its worst.
  • The Marian deal was a marriage made in heaven but intrapersonal conflict between the two sides deep-sixed the deal. There is a lot of bad ju-ju floating around and some serious sour grapes on the part of certain people who are close to MTV's operating staff.

    Individuals within the track assert that at worst the program will continue as it did last year. But I fear that parterships with non-cycling entities will mean an end to MTV as we now know it -- a bike racing track.
  • If the Marian deal was so good why wouldn't the budget challenged IndyParks jump at the opportunity to develop a partnership? Politics have been mentioned as the culprit but I believe the real issue is money. Managing the park is only a small part of the equation. Money, and lots of it, is needed to restore the aging facility. If Marian, or anyone for that matter, came to the table with a workable plan to restore and run Lake Sullivan Park, I'm sure IndyParks wouldn't hesitate to form a partnership.

    Holiday Park is a fine example of a public/private partnership that benefits both stake holders and the general public. The Friends of Holiday Park is a non-profit association of commited individuals who raise all the money needed to maintain and improve that facility, and they have done a fabulous job! Sure, they spoiled IndyParks, but I consider that a good thing because they set the benchmark by which all future IndyParks partnerships will be evaluated.

    Ultimately, it doesn't matter who develops the partnership for Lake Sullivan Park. What does matter, though, is that the 'deal' is structured to provide funding for physical improvements and maintenance in addition to a knowledgeable staff that is passionate about running a multi-use facility. Anything short of that is wishful thinking.
  • Mayor Greg Ballard.

    Name one thing good that has happened under his watch.


    He's got WAY bigger problems than this.

    Greg Ballard: A Mayor only BerwickGuy could love. :lol:
  • A match made in heaven? I’d take a guess that Marian College came in and steamrolled over the Parks Director by using every Catholic force and Political Contact they have. The College most likely pissed off the very people they needed to befriend. Throw in the fact that the College has a history of promising one thing in the media (look at their cycling center, reality versus the IndyStar article, what a joke!) and discussing totally different topics in private “reality”, that we don’t even know the whole story. The Parks wont’ air their dirty laundry and Mr. Peterson and Marian College can spin their stories whichever way they want. Maybe the school will someday figure out they are small fish in the city, and should be a bit more respectful to their community. All they do is take, without ever giving back unless it truly benefits their bottom line (the pocketbook).

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT