IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Verse comes to verse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

A&EIt was my sincere intention to read “And Know This Place: Poetry of Indiana” (Indiana Historical Society Press) from cover to cover. After all, that’s what you are supposed to do when reviewing a book, right? It takes time, of course (which is just one of the reasons you see many more movie reviews than book reviews), but I was ready to face the challenge.

And so, at my desk, I flipped past the long Table of Contents to the Preface, by the books editors, Jenny Kander and C.E. Greer, in which they rationalize titling a book focused on Indiana writers after a line from a poem by … T.S. Eliot?

OK, it’s a good and appropriate line, but doesn’t the need to go to Eliot undermine the premise of the book itself?

I’m thankful the introduction by Roger Mitchell, former director of Indiana University’s Creative Writing Program, effectively makes the case that Indiana truly has been an important home for poets—both those birthed here who left and those who migrated here. (For the record, I’ve never fully understood the difference between a preface and an introduction, so in this case, I figured a cover-to-cover journey should include both.)

Inspired by Mitchell’s perspective, I turned the page to work by the first poet selected by the editors: Philip Appleman.

Who’s he?

Well, since the editors have chosen to eliminate everything except the poems themselves from the body of the book, a flip to the back is required for a look at biographical notes. Once there, most prove inadequate for anyone interested in finding out how the poet is Indiana-rooted. Appleman, for instance, is a distinguished professor emeritus at IU, but the bio doesn’t say if he’s originally from the state. The approach seems shortsighted, given the scale of the book and its likely lonely place on the shelf of close-to-comprehensive Indiana poetry books.

Appleman gets a quartet of poems, including “How Evolution Came to Indiana,” in which,

“In Indianapolis they drive/five hundred miles and end up/where they started.” Then, at the turn of a page and with no transitional commentary, I’m in Donald Baker territory, in which “Advising” advises that, “There’s a long time ago still to come” and where “Jeopardy” isn’t just a game show, but also the state of being while in a foxhole. Next up: shorter pieces from Willis Barnstone.

Then Marianne Boruch.

Then Catherine Bowman …

And it quickly becomes apparent that I’m reading “And Know This Place” like it’s an assignment, anxiously aware that soon the B’s will give way to the C’s (Hello, Dan Carpenter and Jared Carter) with the obligatory Mari Evans just around the corner.

I’m reading the book in a way that will minimize pleasure, draining the joy—the sense of discovery—in an effort to offer an exhaustive review.

Yes, I could finish the volume this way. But my thoughts would represent my absorbing the book in an artificial, academic way. The work deserves better than that.

So, days later, away from the office, perched on a lopsided porch swing inherited from my grandparents, I start again, only this time from the inside.

First stop: selections by my IBJ co-worker Bonnie Maurer (“I am in this silver diner thinking/about the extra ‘s’ in dessert, and the ‘men’ in menu…”). After all, friends are friends.

I then turn to poets I’ve read and enjoyed before, including Yusef Komunyakaa, Etheridge Knight and Donald Platt. And since I’m in the PQR neighborhood, anyway, I stop in to see what the editors decided represents James Whitcomb Riley (nice to see “A Variation,” his celebration of the wrath of women, is in the book instead of something more predictable about frosty pumpkins and orphant girls).

The next day, I rest the book on its spine, let it open and begin reading. Adrian Matejka’s “Divine Order,” is the book’s choice. (“In Indiana, improvisation is using/a balled-up t-shirt as a basketball,/so jazz has no love for the Circle City.”) And then on, randomly, to Jim Walker and Jared Carter and Lisel Mueller.

And here’s the deadline, with “And Know This Place” only fractionally devoured—and, in the case of some poems, already chewed on more than once.

This, I think, is how a big book of poems should be read. Enjoy it for yourself, at your own pace, in any order that works for you.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT