PAGE NOT FOUND


We're sorry, but we cannot find the page you requested. Our Advanced Search page can assist in helping you find the article or content you are attempting to locate.

Thank You!

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. I wanted to respond to Chuck Darwin, but your response was great. You covered my points in a way I could not. Thank you for bringing up the logical questions that science cannot answer.

  2. Those who support creationism always have a snappy retort to refute evolution. Playing the Divine Creator card is always a real discussion stopper. As for something to think about - I'd rather not waste time considering a "theory" that somehow places early man alive at the same time as dinosaurs. Or at least that's what you'll find at the Creationism Museum in Kentucky. And I consider that both silly and sad.

  3. Too many folks nowadays place powerful emphasis on science at the exclusion of a creator. Truth remains that science has not and cannot prove everything -- even scientist must use faith along the way. Science hasn't proved how the world began, but it does propose theories for us to believe. Scientist also rely on in/direct evidence similar to those that believe in a creator. So the science thumpers need to back off this prof at BSU. Science does not owm the market on truth and so opposing viewpoints should not be silenced.

  4. I guess it is not hard to see what you "believe in" Chuck Darwin. The Theory Evolution is interesting, but it is exactly what it says it is.... a theory (especially when it comes to creation). While evolution has been scientifically proven in micro scale (meaning within the same species), it has not been proven on a macro level (i.e. a bird evolving to a fish or others crossing species). Furthermore, the issue with evolution is that it cannot explain creation. Things only evolve if they actually exist. So when you say something like "How silly and sad that some have been duped into believing creationism has any validity," you might want to ask yourself some basic questions about how science validates what you believe in as well; such as 1.) when has nothing created something?, 2.) when has non life created life? 3.) When has chaos and randomness created fine-tuning? I think science has much a more difficult time answering these questions than the thought of identifying in a divine creator. Also, would it be outrageous to think that an "intelligent designer" would create life that could adapt to a changing environment? Just some things to think about.

  5. I have been targeted several times by the Code Enforcement but yet you can drive through the same neighborhood and find 25 other homes that had none of the permits pulled. Once again it must help to line the right pockets. (Reggie guess you tried to line the wrong pocket) FBI, Indianapolis Welcomes you and your crew. Stay for awhile because we have a ton of clean that needs to happen.

ADVERTISEMENT