Victory Field name not for sale

June 17, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
vicfield22The Indianapolis Indians are one of the most stable teams in this region in one of the most stable leagues in the country. The International League will celebrate its 125th anniversary this week at Victory Field.

The highlight comes on Friday when former Indianapolis infielder Don Buford will be inducted into the league’s Hall of Fame.  League President Randy Mobley and Indians President Max Schumacher will join Buford on the field for a special pre-game ceremony that night.

Fans should expect the ceremony to be without wild promotional antics. Though minor league baseball is prone to zany marketing tactics, the Indians have a track record of following tried and true marketing formulas, not the latest trends or outrageous gimmicks. Some would call them downright conservative.

Earlier this year, at the team’s annual shareholder meeting, Schumacher was asked why the team doesn’t sell naming rights to Victory Field, which has been cited by several baseball publications as one of the finest minor league ballparks in the country.

“We like the name Victory Field,” Schumacher told stockholders. “It has a strong tradition behind it.”

The back end of Schumacher’s response shows he’s a student of business as well as history.

“I know naming rights have been a big trend in sports, but naming rights for a minor league team have not proven that lucrative. For a franchise like the Indians, a local enterprise with no national radio or TV deals, a naming rights deal is just not that lucrative. We think Victory Field is a great name. We think there’s equity in that name.”

Reading between the lines, you can sense Schumacher thinks there could be a fan backlash from tattooing Victory Field with a corporate moniker.

Do you agree? Or do you think the Indians should sell naming rights to their home field?
  • I agree. Keep it Victory Field. In this area we so many residents are against change and like how things are tied to history and tradition, it should not be changed. More people still refer to Verizon Wireless Center as Deer Creek, most people still called the RCA dome the Hoosier Dome. Keep it, I'm sick of mentioning the name of a company in a venue to only have that companyt go bankrupt 3 years later, the company rely on that revenue then a change of name, or a loss of revenue stream. Go Victory Field.
  • We're fortunate to have a local, level headed business leader in Max Schumacher. He's right in leaving the name alone. There are a couple of mistakes that were made when designing the new ballpark which was done for a, now measly $18 million. #1: Should have had larger seating capacity on both levels. #1A: Should have had at lease some outfield seating on both lines with still enough 'picnic' area dedicated between center field and would be bleachers. (Suggestion) Offer limited 'pavillion' naming rights to build outfield seats. {The Simon left field Pavillion}. Had this been done originally this stadium would have been in serious contention for a number of things, including, to the fearful chagrin of Nebraskans, the College World Series.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.