Vote delayed on Indiana same-sex marriage amendment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A vote in the Indiana House on a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage has been delayed for at least a day.

Resolution sponsor Rep. Eric Turner of Marion said he wouldn't call it for a vote on Monday because some House members who want to support it were absent for the day. He didn't specify when he expected a vote.

The proposed amendment stalled in the House under Democratic majorities the last four years, but is expected to advance since Republicans won control of the House in last year's election.

If it clears both the House and Senate this year, it would have to pass again in 2013 or 2014 before getting on the ballot for a statewide referendum.


  • Sickening!
    This is terrible! Passing this sets Indiana as a state who disrespects the very people it is meant to protect. This is a classic 'I am better than you' bill that dictates someone's life decisions. How in the hell does it negatively impact anyone else if a same sex couple gets married? For once, stop kissing the butts of your political backers and think about a bill!
    I grew up believing that in America we were a nation of high moral character. We lived by the principle that you can love your neighbor even if you don't agree.

    Right now we are watching Egypt create a new democracy. Some movements/parties there would like to see a sharia law based government. A government based not on democracy, but theocracy. Would anyone supporting this proposal support an Egyptian government based on Sharia law? I would hope not, but their actions here sure don't make it at all clear.

    Our democracy is so strong because it does not dictate religious morality. We adhere to human morality. Acceptance, compassion, and nondiscrimination. A nation divided cannot stand, and there are too many religious lines on which this country can be divided to involve religion with government.

    If you don't like gay marriage then don't have a gay marriage. Your marriage is only as sacred as you make it. If you think that the actions of anyone else can effect what your marriage means, then you have some work to do on your own relationship; with God, and with your spouse.

    Most importantly, keep your hands off of my constitution! This has nothing to do with how our government works. If this ban were legitimate, which it isn't, it still would not be appropriate to put it in a constitution. It is an issue that would properly fit in the Indiana Code, not the Indiana Constitution. Please take a little time and read the Indiana Constitution to realize what a constitution is for. It is a framework for how the government works, not a platform to codify social laws. (Civics: 101)

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.