Vote delayed on Indiana same-sex marriage amendment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A vote in the Indiana House on a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage has been delayed for at least a day.

Resolution sponsor Rep. Eric Turner of Marion said he wouldn't call it for a vote on Monday because some House members who want to support it were absent for the day. He didn't specify when he expected a vote.

The proposed amendment stalled in the House under Democratic majorities the last four years, but is expected to advance since Republicans won control of the House in last year's election.

If it clears both the House and Senate this year, it would have to pass again in 2013 or 2014 before getting on the ballot for a statewide referendum.


  • Sickening!
    This is terrible! Passing this sets Indiana as a state who disrespects the very people it is meant to protect. This is a classic 'I am better than you' bill that dictates someone's life decisions. How in the hell does it negatively impact anyone else if a same sex couple gets married? For once, stop kissing the butts of your political backers and think about a bill!
    I grew up believing that in America we were a nation of high moral character. We lived by the principle that you can love your neighbor even if you don't agree.

    Right now we are watching Egypt create a new democracy. Some movements/parties there would like to see a sharia law based government. A government based not on democracy, but theocracy. Would anyone supporting this proposal support an Egyptian government based on Sharia law? I would hope not, but their actions here sure don't make it at all clear.

    Our democracy is so strong because it does not dictate religious morality. We adhere to human morality. Acceptance, compassion, and nondiscrimination. A nation divided cannot stand, and there are too many religious lines on which this country can be divided to involve religion with government.

    If you don't like gay marriage then don't have a gay marriage. Your marriage is only as sacred as you make it. If you think that the actions of anyone else can effect what your marriage means, then you have some work to do on your own relationship; with God, and with your spouse.

    Most importantly, keep your hands off of my constitution! This has nothing to do with how our government works. If this ban were legitimate, which it isn't, it still would not be appropriate to put it in a constitution. It is an issue that would properly fit in the Indiana Code, not the Indiana Constitution. Please take a little time and read the Indiana Constitution to realize what a constitution is for. It is a framework for how the government works, not a platform to codify social laws. (Civics: 101)

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By the way, the right to work law is intended to prevent forced union membership, not as a way to keep workers in bondage as you make it sound, Italiano. If union leadership would spend all of their funding on the workers, who they are supposed to be representing, instead of trying to buy political favor and living lavish lifestyles as a result of the forced membership, this law would never had been necessary.

  2. Unions once served a noble purpose before greed and apathy took over. Now most unions are just as bad or even worse than the ills they sought to correct. I don't believe I have seen a positive comment posted by you. If you don't like the way things are done here, why do you live here? It would seem a more liberal environment like New York or California would suit you better?

  3. just to clear it up... Straight No Chaser is an a capella group that formed at IU. They've toured nationally typically doing a capella arangements of everything from Old Songbook Standards to current hits on the radio.

  4. This surprises you? Mayor Marine pulled the same crap whenhe levered the assets of the water co up by half a billion $$$ then he created his GRAFTER PROGRAM called REBUILDINDY. That program did not do anything for the Ratepayors Water Infrastructure Assets except encumber them and FORCE invitable higher water and sewer rates on Ratepayors to cover debt coverage on the dough he stole FROM THE PUBLIC TRUST. The guy is morally bankrupt to the average taxpayer and Ratepayor.

  5. There is no developer on the planet that isn't aware of what their subcontractors are doing (or not doing). They hire construction superintendents. They have architects and engineers on site to observe construction progress. If your subcontractor wasn't doing their job, you fire them and find someone who will. If people wonder why more condos aren't being built, developers like Kosene & Kosene are the reason. I am glad the residents were on the winning end after a long battle.