IBJNews

Voters approve higher taxes for area school districts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Three cash-strapped Indianapolis-area school districts received voter approval Tuesday for property-tax hikes.

Decatur Township Schools in southwest Marion County sought $27 million in a referendum to help it save two district schools and preserve bus service. About 64 percent of voters approved the measure.

Property tax rates in the district will rise 29 cents per $100 of valuation starting in 2015 and continuing for seven years. Officials said it would raise the tax bill for an average home in the district about $7 per month.

In Hancock County, voters narrowly passed a property-tax hike to raise $2.5 million for Mount Vernon Community Schools. The measure passed by 10 votes.

The three-year hike is expected to raise tax bills by about $40 per year for homes with an assessed value of $100,000, starting in 2015.

In Morgan County, more than 80 percent of voters approved a referendum to raise $4.3 million for Eminence Community Schools. Officials said the system was in danger of closing without the additional funding.

The seven-year hike will raise the property tax rate by 40 cents per $100 of valuation, starting in 2015 and continuing for seven years.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Correct Math
    A $140,000 home with a increase of 29 cents per $100 would lead to an increase of $480/year or $34/month. how do you get 7 bucks a month?
  • Be consistent
    What I always find intriguing with the referendums is that the cost that is quoted is always in cents (media, politicians). Even here, the measures are so small to save the children. Is the average home assessment in Decatur Township really $28,995 - correct me if I am wrong but that is the increase for an average $7/month increase in taxes. Imagine my surprise when I get a tax bill that is $290 per year when my house is worth $100,000. (and $400 for seven years in Morgan County - I hope I have kids in the district for an extra $2,800 per $100,000 household)
  • For education
    I'm all for improving our educational system, and if more money is needed then i'm all for that.....BUT show me that this money is actually improving education performance. I'm highly skeptical. I get that improvement need to be made in infastructure, and that doesn't always directly influence classroom performance. However, it seems that lately our only solution to improving our education system is to throw more money at the problem. Not saying that the case here, but its very rarely about the money, yet a certain political party always seems to find the answer is simply increase taxes and throw money at the problem.
  • Voters are Stupid
    Schools have budgets with millions of dollars and assets usually over hundred million or more. Yet they need more money? As far as I can tell they do not disclose full information about the situation but only information to provide the perception necessary to pass a vote with uninformed voters. In searching I could not find MSD budget or financials, Hancock County has an outdated 2011 budget on their website...incidentally, they had a $9.2 M surplus budgeted in 2011...but they need more money...government has hundreds of millions of revenue, billions in assets and still the people keep giving these cretins more money. When are you going to learn, if you want to have government run efficiently you have to turn off the spigot.
  • Referendum vs. Better Performance
    It would be really interesting if the IBJ did a study on voter approved referendums on schools and compare before and after student performance. For example, are the students at recently renovated IPS schools doing any better this year than they were before the $250 million was spent?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT