We must explore alternative energy

August 14, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

The Viewpoint essay penned by Peter Grossman [in the July 26 issue] was infuriating. The incendiary headline (“Bill Gates wants to spend your money”) was shameful. As of 2007, Bill and Melinda Gates were the second-most-generous philanthropists in America, having given over $28 billion to charity. They have since pledged to donate their entire $58 billion fortune to charity upon their deaths, leaving nothing even for their children. They are currently working to convince other American billionaires to follow their example. There is not enough room in this newspaper to enumerate all of Gates’ philanthropic acts.

Grossman suggests that Gates made his fortune “by having a good sense of the market.” Grossman must be the only person in America unaware that Gates designed and developed the modern personal computer, something which has arguably benefited nearly everyone alive today. Instead, it would seem that Grossman prefers to celebrate the kind of billionaire who inherited a fortune from his parents and then doubled it through investment—the kind of billionaire who amasses wealth only to be used for the pleasure of himself and his family.

Grossman suggests that the acts of Presidents Carter, Bush and Obama to develop alternative energy sources were complete wastes of time and resources. One can only arrive at this conclusion if they ignore two indisputable facts: Burning oil and coal is bad for human health and our environment, and fossil fuel reserves will not last forever.

Grossman implies that research into alternative energy is a waste of time because it is not cost-effective. According to this logic, we should continue to use asbestos in home construction, knowing that it is a carcinogen, until the cost of liability lawsuits exceeds the profits to be made. And yes, you are correct that “very little oil is used to generate electricity.” The vast majority of electricity is created by burning coal. The hope is that alternative energy can replace both.

If you want to suggest that this new effort by Gates will ultimately fail, then you may very well be correct. Developing a cost-effective replacement for all of the oil and coal in the world is a lofty goal. But to paint this effort as the selfish act of a greedy tycoon is wrong.

The question must be asked: What would you, Mr. Grossman, prefer that we do instead?


Joshua Hassett


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....