IBJNews

WellPoint fails to profit on consumer pullback

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With recession-weary Americans going to the doctor less, health insurer WellPoint Inc. should be enjoying higher profits. But it isn’t working out that way.

Indianapolis-based WellPoint spent nearly 86 percent of insurance premiums collected on paying medical bills during its second quarter, substantially higher than the 83 percent it paid in the same quarter last year. And the company expects medical bills to remain elevated the rest of the year.

Those higher costs helped push WellPoint’s profit down 3 percent in the second quarter, to $702 million.

The blame for this was cast on WellPoint’s Medicare Advantage customers in northern California, who are racking up medical bills that exceed the premiums they’re paying. Many of these customers switched over to WellPoint this year after Philadelphia-based Cigna Corp. left the market. WellPoint officials said they did not set their prices high enough for the level of care these customers need.

But Citigroup analyst Carl McDonald said the Medicare issues were not enough to account for all of WellPoint’s woes during the quarter. He estimated that expenses for medical bills in the rest of WellPoint’s business rose nearly as much—with the problems most likely coming in its employer-sponsored, or commercial, health plans.

“That the commercial loss ratio deteriorated isn’t surprising,” McDonald wrote in a July 28 report, noting declines at other health insurers, UnitedHealthcare and Aetna. “However, the magnitude of the change is, particularly considering how favorable industry utilization has been.”

McDonald estimated the medical bills for employer-sponsored plans rose 4 percentage points in the second quarter—a huge increase. He titled his report, “What Do You Think Of Your Team’s Execution? Right Now, I’m In Favor Of It.”

WellPoint officials attributed its commercial business’s higher medical expenses—also known as a benefit-expense ratio—to the fact that it socked away more in reserves, about $300 million in the second quarter. That spending offset lower spending on health care by consumers.

WellPoint reported that the cost of medical care has been rising about 7.5 percent this year for its fully insured customers, down from historical norms of about 8.5 percent. Other health insurers have reported similar trends.

“Our commercial benefit-expense ratio was stable on a year-to-date basis as the impact of lower prior period reserve development was offset by lower than expected, underlying medical cost trends during the first six months of 2011,” WellPoint CEO Angela Braly told investors and analysts during a July 27 conference call. She called the performance in WellPoint’s commercial business “strong.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT