Were 'Great Books' a great idea?

October 22, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
The 54-volume Great Books of the Western World series, a set of books that sold more than a million copies in the 1950s and '60s, was:

 a. an empowering, groundbreaking effort to bring brilliant writing to the masses.

b. a sales stunt perpetrated by Encyclopedia Britannica.

c. a precurser to the Oprah book club.

d. a dust collector.

e. a sign that, 50 years ago, we cared more about ideas than we do now.

f. a noble folly created by some University of Chicago eggheads.

g. an attempt to enshrine the works of "dead white men" at the expense of other voices. 

h. all of the above.

i. none of the above.

Having just read Alex Beam's "A Great Idea at the Time," a fascinating look at the Great Books phenomenon (due out next month from PublicAffairs publishers), I'm still wrestling with that question. While my family didn't own an official Great Books set, we did have a book club variation from Classics Club. And, like many such sets, ours still doesn't feature many cracked spines, even as I've moved it from house to house.

Beam's very readable book, unlike many of the Great Books, is both informed and breezy. And he doesn't shy away from throwing attitude around, especially when it comes to pompous Great Books champion Mortimer Adler. It explores not just the history of the series and the process of its selection and creation but also its impact, including the creation of book groups around the country.

The Great Books Foundatin, by the way, is still around. You can find it here.

So did you have a shelf of these books in your home? And is a classic by definition, as Robert Hutchens, one of the key men responsible for the Great Books series, said, "a book no one reads"? Read any Euclid or Nicomachus lately?

Your thoughts?
  • My husband was so enthralled with the Great Books collection that as soon as he got his first real job, he purchased a set for our house...which now sits around collecting dust. Also interesting to note, he gained his love of the Great Books growing up in Canada, so it seems that the Canucks experienced this phenomenon too.
  • Classics are classic because they stand the test of time; generations of readers believe they are among the greatest of all books ever written. So yes, I think that the various lists of great literature serve a purpose. Just read a Nicholas Sparks novel and then Leo Tolstoy's Anna Karenina, for example, and tell me you don't wish someone had pointed out beforehand which you should spend your time on.

    Too many people are intimidated y great books or classic literature. Give one a try! With a few exceptions like Kite Runner,you may never go back to the modern novel.
  • Argumentum ad Hominem

    The subtitle should have read, Every Negative Fact and Innuendo I Could Dredge Up

    Although he was not particularly unkind to me in the book, I found virtually every page to be a smart-alecky and snide diatribe of the worst order against the Great Books, Adler, Hutchins, et al. Plus the book is replete with errors of commission and omission.

    As an effective antidote, I prescribe Robert Hutchins' pithy essay, The Great Conversation.

    If the Great Books crusade is as bleak as Beam purports, then happily, not many will read his invective book.

    Max Weismann,
    President and co-founder with Mortimer Adler, Center for the Study of The Great Ideas
    Chairman, The Great Books Academy

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now