What if you ran the NEA?

March 2, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
An interesting piece in the LA Times asks a range of high-profile folks (including, at the extremes, Bill Maher and Ann Coulter) what they would do if they ran the NEA.

Some interesting thoughts (Warning: If you click on the story, you also have to click each individual for responses. Annoying.):

--Playwright/screenwriter Jon Robin Baitz suggests a dedicated tax to the NEA for all artists making over $1 million a year.

--Choreographer Bill T. Jones wants a cabinet post for the arts.

--News commentator Rachel Maddow would push for more arts education in prisons.

--Photographer Judy Fiskin suggests abandoning the "arts are educational" argument.  

 --Neil LaBute takes the wisenheimer approach, suggesting among other things, that he would "support a number of dance programs because, let's face it, dance gets the short end of the stick in the arts, yet it's really fun to watch and people often get naked."

Your thoughts? (FYI: The NEA head honcho position is still open.)
  • well, dance does get the short end... but, theater suffers more.

    if they are passing out money, i work for a small theater company in utah... and
    i'd love to have more than $350 a season to produce my props for three plays in

    feel free to contact me for details on donating.

    (tongue in cheek... sorta)
  • A big hello to all of our readers in Utah.
  • actually, i'm in london.... and new york on occasion... and work in utah in the summer. but,
    they all say howdy back!

    does this mean you'll be sending money?
  • I'm surprised-but-not-surprised at the similarities between the responses of Ann Coulter, Neil LaBute, and Bill Maher. They're about as politically different as it's possible to be, but unified by the bond of smart-assery. LaBute and Maher go straight to the point, though, about the self-importance and pretensions of artists, whereas Coulter views it through her perpetual liberals-are-dumb-and/or-evil filter, which just gets sort of tiresome after about four seconds. (I have to admit, though, her proposal of Kincade for painter laureate is pretty funny in light (no pun intended) of the recent discussion about his impending Indy 500 art.)

    And is it me, or does anyone else think Neil LaBute looks like the angry younger brother of George Lucas?
  • Spend my budget on trying to find where the NEA is permitted by the Constitution.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.