What if you ran the NEA?

March 2, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
An interesting piece in the LA Times asks a range of high-profile folks (including, at the extremes, Bill Maher and Ann Coulter) what they would do if they ran the NEA.

Some interesting thoughts (Warning: If you click on the story, you also have to click each individual for responses. Annoying.):

--Playwright/screenwriter Jon Robin Baitz suggests a dedicated tax to the NEA for all artists making over $1 million a year.

--Choreographer Bill T. Jones wants a cabinet post for the arts.

--News commentator Rachel Maddow would push for more arts education in prisons.

--Photographer Judy Fiskin suggests abandoning the "arts are educational" argument.  

 --Neil LaBute takes the wisenheimer approach, suggesting among other things, that he would "support a number of dance programs because, let's face it, dance gets the short end of the stick in the arts, yet it's really fun to watch and people often get naked."

Your thoughts? (FYI: The NEA head honcho position is still open.)
  • well, dance does get the short end... but, theater suffers more.

    if they are passing out money, i work for a small theater company in utah... and
    i'd love to have more than $350 a season to produce my props for three plays in

    feel free to contact me for details on donating.

    (tongue in cheek... sorta)
  • A big hello to all of our readers in Utah.
  • actually, i'm in london.... and new york on occasion... and work in utah in the summer. but,
    they all say howdy back!

    does this mean you'll be sending money?
  • I'm surprised-but-not-surprised at the similarities between the responses of Ann Coulter, Neil LaBute, and Bill Maher. They're about as politically different as it's possible to be, but unified by the bond of smart-assery. LaBute and Maher go straight to the point, though, about the self-importance and pretensions of artists, whereas Coulter views it through her perpetual liberals-are-dumb-and/or-evil filter, which just gets sort of tiresome after about four seconds. (I have to admit, though, her proposal of Kincade for painter laureate is pretty funny in light (no pun intended) of the recent discussion about his impending Indy 500 art.)

    And is it me, or does anyone else think Neil LaBute looks like the angry younger brother of George Lucas?
  • Spend my budget on trying to find where the NEA is permitted by the Constitution.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing